Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: What are your thoughts on the Flames CalgaryNext presentation? (select multiple)
Get digging, I love it all! 259 37.27%
Too much tax money 125 17.99%
Too much ticket tax 54 7.77%
Need more parking 130 18.71%
I need more details, can't say at this time 200 28.78%
The city owns it? Great deal for Calgary 110 15.83%
Need to clean up this area anyway, its embarassing 179 25.76%
Needs a retractable roof 89 12.81%
Great idea but don't think it will fly with stake holders 69 9.93%
Why did it take 2 years to come up with this? 161 23.17%
Curious to see the city's response 194 27.91%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 695. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-12-2015, 03:36 PM   #141
RM14
First Line Centre
 
RM14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
Having the Stampeders play in a multi-purpose building makes a lot of sense unless it looks like garbage. Hopefully they have pictures on the 18th.
And the seats are able to be tight to the field. I assume there will be a track that CFL configuration would cover.
RM14 is offline  
Old 08-12-2015, 03:40 PM   #142
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

I'm hoping for an MLS team.

I know its a long shot, but I'm really digging MLS games. Assertive offense focused soccer is entertaining.

I'll be a founder STH.
Badgers Nose is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Badgers Nose For This Useful Post:
Old 08-12-2015, 03:41 PM   #143
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
Why is remediation of land the sellers problem? Why can't they sell as is?

I mean other than taking a hit on the value.. I am sure you could still make money off it.
Yeah, if its same difference why would the buyer mind?

Because it is probably not, and they don't want to get stuck with the bill.

But it will all get sorted out.
Badgers Nose is offline  
Old 08-12-2015, 03:42 PM   #144
johnnybegaudreau
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Calgary
Default

For the earlier posters. Fieldhouse is just a generic name for a sporting venue. It's used a lot in colleges in the states. Many colleges have their fieldhouse/training facilities like UM, a few basketball teams too etc. They are very much full sized stadiums and or arenas (in the case of bball) with all the amenities for housing football, basketball, track and swimming and other stuff.

This will be a transformative football arena with amenties for public use... see the Calgary Fieldhouse project for the types of events and sort of set up that they will want for public use. All kinds of amateur sports groups need something like this. The rumored 200M i think is fair given that many amateur groups that need this sort of facility built. Not to mention the Flames foundation for life has built amateur arenas and given money to amateur sporting facilities in Calgary for the last 20 years. TBH that's way better than McMahon which sits empty 90% of the year. The stamps play what 10 games a season maybe 12 if they go the distance. It be great to have that thing booked all the time. Also as others have pointed out having a transformative stadium complex allows for MLS expansion, potentially concert series, and many many variety of other events. Smart move by the Flames. It's one I predicted on here months back in the arena thread. Financially, economically it makes sense on mutliple levels. I think it's something Calgarian tax payers can behind too.

Last edited by johnnybegaudreau; 08-12-2015 at 03:50 PM.
johnnybegaudreau is offline  
Old 08-12-2015, 03:44 PM   #145
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikephoen View Post
Have all season ticket holders been invited to this? I haven't seen the invite in my email yet.
Given the limited space, invites are probably by seniority.
Resolute 14 is offline  
Old 08-12-2015, 03:45 PM   #146
TX_Flame
Crash and Bang Winger
 
TX_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmac98 View Post
Just make it really ugly and call it an art project. There's another 1% from the city contributed right there...
Ugly??? I think that bridge is one of the coolest things in the entire city. Calgary finally built something that belongs in the 21st century.
TX_Flame is offline  
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to TX_Flame For This Useful Post:
Old 08-12-2015, 03:46 PM   #147
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnybegaudreau View Post
For the earlier posters. Fieldhouse is just a generic name for a sporting venue. It's used a lot in colleges in the states. Many colleges have their fieldhouse/training facilities like UM, a few basketball teams too etc. They are very much full sized stadiums and or arenas (in the case of bball) with all the amenities for housing football, basketball, track and swimming and other stuff.

This will be a transformative football arena with amenties for public use... see the Calgary Fieldhouse project for the types of events and sort of set up that they will want for public use. All kinds of amateur sports groups need something like this. The rumored 200M i think is fair given that many amateur groups that need this sort of facility built. Not to mention the Flames foundation for life has built amateur arenas and given money to amateur sporting facilities in Calgary for the last 20 years. TBH that's way better than McMahon which sits empty 90% of the year. The stamps play what 10 games a season maybe 12 if they go the distance. It be great to have that thing booked all the time. Also as others have pointed out having a transformative stadium complex allows for MLS expansion, potentially concert series, and many many variety of other events. Smart move by the Flames. It's one I predicted on here months back in the arena thread. Financially, economically it makes sense on mutliple levels. I think it's something Calgarian tax payers can behind too.
This also makes sense when I try to visualize this project in the west village. I was trying to visualize a football stadium, arena, entertainment district AND a fieldhouse and I just couldn't picture where it would all go.
jayswin is offline  
Old 08-12-2015, 03:47 PM   #148
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shermanator View Post
Anyone thinking that we are getting an MLS team with this complex is completely out to lunch. MLS has NO interest in expanding in Canada. You can all forget about that possibility.

However, there have been rumours that a Canadian Division 1 is going to launch in 2017, with a Calgary team, that may have the Flames involved as investors. Perhaps a fieldhouse would work as a grounds for that team? The information is really only being leaked from one source so they have been taken with a large grain of salt to date until a second source of leaks can corroborate the information.

http://www.canadiansoccernews.com/in...e-cities-r5374
Agreed, and thanks for sharing this. This is exactly what I was expecting all along. Calgary is just way too far down the list of potential MLS cities.
Resolute 14 is offline  
Old 08-12-2015, 03:48 PM   #149
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Demaeon View Post
Did you even read the email?
not a formal LAUNCH.

Unless your just trying to be funny...
Daradon is offline  
Old 08-12-2015, 03:49 PM   #150
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

It's going to be awesome not having to choose between a beer and a pee, if you don't want to miss any of the game. It was so bad during the playoffs that we actually left the dome, went behind some bushes and then re-entered. This proved to be an excellent strategy.
heep223 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to heep223 For This Useful Post:
Old 08-12-2015, 03:50 PM   #151
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
That is basically the same thing. Either way it comes out of the sellers pocket.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
Yeah, if its same difference why would the buyer mind?

Because it is probably not, and they don't want to get stuck with the bill.

But it will all get sorted out.
I think if I owned the land and it was valuable to the flames to build their stadiums I wouldn't be paying for most of the remediation. I think I would be able to negotiate more than what the value of the land would be minus clean up.
Weitz is offline  
Old 08-12-2015, 03:52 PM   #152
I-Hate-Hulse
Franchise Player
 
I-Hate-Hulse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Maybe this arena has been under construction this whole time in secret and on Tuesday it will rise from under the bow river in epic fashion.


Maybe Ken King has been watching Contact and we get a suspiciously red tinged clone of Edmonton's Roger's Place...
I-Hate-Hulse is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to I-Hate-Hulse For This Useful Post:
Old 08-12-2015, 03:52 PM   #153
BurningSteel
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by H2SO4(aq) View Post
Never thought I'd live to see the announcement
Knock on some wood. Monday is a long ways off.
BurningSteel is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to BurningSteel For This Useful Post:
Old 08-12-2015, 03:53 PM   #154
TX_Flame
Crash and Bang Winger
 
TX_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
Well, my 'socks' are now blown off.
You mean your soccers are blown off, no? How about your boots?
TX_Flame is offline  
Old 08-12-2015, 03:57 PM   #155
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

My prediction re: funding proposal:

$200m cash from owners for arena
$200m ticket tax over a period of time (backdropped by owners, not City)
$200m from City for Fieldhouse/Stadium (instead of $200m City has for Foothills Fieldhouse in its capital plan - note it is unfunded still)
$100m cash from owners for Fieldhouse/Stadium
$200m borrowed through CRL (like East Village) for remediation and infrastructure
$100m from Province and/or Feds for environmental remediation and infrastructure (helping facilitate but not paying for arena/stadium for things needed anyway regardless of those facilities)
Land given by City for "free"

Boom $1 billion give or take.
__________________
Trust the snake.

Last edited by Bunk; 08-12-2015 at 03:59 PM.
Bunk is offline  
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
Old 08-12-2015, 03:57 PM   #156
Thunderball
Franchise Player
 
Thunderball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
Agreed, and thanks for sharing this. This is exactly what I was expecting all along. Calgary is just way too far down the list of potential MLS cities.
Money talks, and if an ownership group like the Flames with a new stadium designed for MLS comes along, Calgary may jump to the top of the list pretty fast. MLS isn't actively seeking Canadian clubs, but I doubt they would refuse if the right arrangement came along (something like this). The ultimate build up for MLS is likely 32, just like the other American sport leagues. Minnesota for instance was just announced and are still three years out (2018). Hence a 10 year plan seems feasible.

CSA Div 1A is an even bigger pipe dream with reports coming only from one reporter. It smells of Canadian Baseball League or worse, the CUSL plans.
NASL is possible due to the rumblings of a Canadian division, and the existence of Ottawa and Edmonton, but Division 2 soccer might be too minor league for the Flames to consider as part of their plans when planning at this scale.

No doubt they are sounding out MLS. Whether they can queue jump is another question.

Last edited by Thunderball; 08-12-2015 at 04:02 PM.
Thunderball is offline  
Old 08-12-2015, 03:59 PM   #157
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Cecil Hotel being demolished. New arena site?

http://calgaryherald.com/business/co...6d972559461715

This particular block is poised for redevelopment with a number of other projects planned in the vicinity
troutman is offline  
Old 08-12-2015, 03:59 PM   #158
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Roger Millions @RogMillions
A source has suggested to me "CalgaryNext" if and when "vision" goes ahead could take up to 8 years to totally be completed. We will see
sureLoss is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 08-12-2015, 04:00 PM   #159
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

It looks like the press conference will be at 2:30 on Tuesday:

Quote:
Kristen Odland ‏@KristenOdlandCH

Calgary Sports and Entertainment Corporation to "introduce vision" on Tuesday at 2:30 p.m. at the Scotiabank Saddledome.
So, all you unwashed "Tier 2" fans will be able to see it then.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 08-12-2015, 04:01 PM   #160
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Roger Millions @RogMillions
A source has suggested to me "CalgaryNext" if and when "vision" goes ahead could take up to 8 years to totally be completed. We will see
Well, of course. If there's work / live / play components, and not just sports facilities, we're talking about a commitment to development. That takes time. Just look at the East Village.
Muta is online now  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:51 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy