09-07-2015, 10:29 PM
|
#141
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Yup Calgary-Confederation is a dead heat and Calgary Center Hehr is leading
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GirlySports For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-08-2015, 09:19 AM
|
#142
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
|
More detailed breakdown of the numbers and likely details for leadership choices in this other article
http://www.nanosresearch.com/library...0TrackingE.pdf
Last edited by FlameOn; 09-08-2015 at 09:33 AM.
|
|
|
09-08-2015, 12:39 PM
|
#143
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
If you go down to the province level, its interesting how divided they are. Most have runaway leaders:
Quebec and BC - NDP
Alberta, Sask, Manitoba - Conservative
Maritimes - Liberal
Ontario is starting to lean Liberal which would be the death knell for the Conservatives.
|
|
|
09-08-2015, 12:57 PM
|
#144
|
I believe in the Jays.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss
If you go down to the province level, its interesting how divided they are. Most have runaway leaders:
Quebec and BC - NDP
|
Not sure I'd call BC a runaway province for the NDP. In Nanos's breakdown it's the only region with intersecting lines making it more of a volitile situation then the others (and apart from Ontario it has the lowest differential between 1st and 2nd).
|
|
|
09-08-2015, 12:59 PM
|
#145
|
Franchise Player
|
Conservatives have run their course. I supported them over the last few elections, but they've got nothing left to give (especially Harper). Their regressive views on immigration, drugs, and crime are way past their expiration date. Time for a change
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ducay For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-08-2015, 01:06 PM
|
#146
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
Not sure I'd call BC a runaway province for the NDP. In Nanos's breakdown it's the only region with intersecting lines making it more of a volitile situation then the others (and apart from Ontario it has the lowest differential between 1st and 2nd).
|
Yeah, I read somewhere that the election could possibly be decided by BC. That would be a real change as previously the election is over before our polls close.
|
|
|
09-08-2015, 02:06 PM
|
#147
|
UnModerator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
|
You mean my vote will matter and the election won't have been decided before I get off work?!
__________________

THANK MR DEMKOCPHL Ottawa Vancouver
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Blaster86 For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-08-2015, 03:08 PM
|
#148
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameOn
|
Liberals appear to be the 2nd choice of everyone according to the link. We could potentially see some strategic voting that puts the liberals in power.
__________________
The of and to a in is I that it for you was with on as have but be they
|
|
|
09-08-2015, 03:46 PM
|
#149
|
wins 10 internets
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: slightly to the left
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Slinger
Liberals appear to be the 2nd choice of everyone according to the link. We could potentially see some strategic voting that puts the liberals in power.
|
This could be a devastating election for the CPC. I have a lot of family members who have only ever voted Conservative in national elections, but now will be voting Liberal as an anti-NDP measure. This could become a runaway train as the CPC numbers dip and more conservative-only voters switch to a strategic vote (or not vote at all) if they think that Harper has no chance
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hemi-Cuda For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-09-2015, 09:08 AM
|
#151
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
|
I have found myself drifting from blue to red these past few days...
|
|
|
09-09-2015, 09:27 AM
|
#152
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda
This could be a devastating election for the CPC. I have a lot of family members who have only ever voted Conservative in national elections, but now will be voting Liberal as an anti-NDP measure. This could become a runaway train as the CPC numbers dip and more conservative-only voters switch to a strategic vote (or not vote at all) if they think that Harper has no chance
|
I wonder if this is mainly an Alberta thing (not sure where you actually live). The only time I've ever heard of strategic voting around here is against the Conservatives.
Also seems weird in the sense that at least budget wise the NDP are more aligned with the Conservatives than the Liberals.
|
|
|
09-09-2015, 10:13 AM
|
#153
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda
This could be a devastating election for the CPC. I have a lot of family members who have only ever voted Conservative in national elections, but now will be voting Liberal as an anti-NDP measure. This could become a runaway train as the CPC numbers dip and more conservative-only voters switch to a strategic vote (or not vote at all) if they think that Harper has no chance
|
All the current Alberta seat projections (except some around the Edmonton area) look to be safely in CPC hands. I don't think there will be enough strategic votes to tip the balance towards the LPC, especially for a Trudeau here... though if it amounts to just a few seat difference that may be the difference maker.
|
|
|
09-09-2015, 10:43 AM
|
#154
|
I believe in the Jays.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameOn
All the current Alberta seat projections (except some around the Edmonton area) look to be safely in CPC hands.
|
Which projections? 308 has Centre and Skyview in Red with Confederation a virtual coin toss.
|
|
|
09-09-2015, 10:54 AM
|
#155
|
I believe in the Jays.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss
Also seems weird in the sense that at least budget wise the NDP are more aligned with the Conservatives than the Liberals.
|
... I highly doubt that.
Sure they may both be pledging balanced budgets sooner rather then later (fat chance without fudging the numbers or renegaging on campaign promises I figure) but I would be shocked if they were in any sort of agreement on spending allotments. The budget is less about how much is spent then what it is spent on.
|
|
|
09-09-2015, 11:08 AM
|
#157
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary in Heart, Ottawa in Body
|
Although it doesn't include updates from today 308 looks like it has 7 Alberta seats going to either the NDP/Liberals. Edmonton seems to be staying NDP orange after the provincial election, as well as Lethbridge. Edmonton Millwoods and Riverbend are also a toss-up. Calgary Centre and Skyview both appear to be going Liberal red. If the polls continue their direction, we may see Calgary Confederation and Calgary Forrest Lawn move towards the Liberals.
http://www.threehundredeight.com/p/canada.html
|
|
|
09-09-2015, 12:40 PM
|
#158
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by c.t.ner
I made fun of 308 during the provincial election, because I thought he was out to lunch... until he was pretty dead on with his calls.
I can't see Liepert losing as he has a name (by beating Anders and also his time in the Alberta Government), but I can see Forrest Lawn shifting to the Liberals if things keep going the way they are. Calgary-Confederation is another Calgary seat to watch as it looks like that is a close race between the Liberals and conservatives.
|
Also worth noting. I don't believe the NDP have named a candidate for Signal Hill yet, and 308 projects 18% would support them. If those voters switch over to Liberals, the Liberals may just take the seat.
It's tough to say though. This is my riding and it's historically been a Conservative or nothing riding. After all, we kept voting Anders back in
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to littlereddevil For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-09-2015, 01:23 PM
|
#159
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
We've been talking about strategic voting and what exactly is the path to victory for the Liberals, so I did a quick perusing of 308's riding projections, which are admittedly not completely accurate and I identified about 22 seats where either the NDP or Conservatives were leading by a slim margin and the Liberals were a close enough second that if 1/4 of the CPC voters switched to the Liberals, they would then win that riding. Based on the overall seat projections, the Liberals would only need to win half of those ridings to form a minority government, but they really don't have any path to a majority government.
Regionally they breakdown like this:
Ridings where the NDP are leading, Liberals close second:
BC - 4
AB - 1
MB - 1
ON - 1
QC - 1
NB - 1
NS - 1
Total: 10
Ridings where the CPC are leading, Liberals close second:
BC - 2
AB - 1
MB - 1
ON - 7
NB - 1
|
|
|
09-09-2015, 02:07 PM
|
#160
|
Franchise Player
|
For what it is worth, direct from an NDP candidate's mouth, a lot of doors are:
Anyone but Harper; and
Anyone but Trudeau
So the strategic voting profile might turn a bunch of votes to the NDP.
Personally, i'm much more concerned about Trudeau than I am about Mulclair. Really hope the Liberals get decimated and replace Trudeau so they can be an alternative for my vote.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:35 AM.
|
|