Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-07-2014, 09:35 AM   #141
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Original FFIV View Post
Thinking about this more, maybe Treliving is ok bringing Butler back contingent on us moving one of our d (cough cough Wideman). If we are able to move wideman for a valuable piece no harm in bringing Butler back as we still need nhl d. Provided he is used properly butler is serviceable.
I kind of cringe of the thought of our 5/6 pairing being Butler and Engelland... Unless we want really want a shot at McDavid/Eichel.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2014, 09:37 AM   #142
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
I kind of cringe of the thought of our 5/6 pairing being Butler and Engelland... Unless we want really want a shot at McDavid/Eichel.
I do. Butler-Engelland would actually be a fine 3rd pair.

Smid-Russell would be a pair playing too much and will get exposed.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2014, 09:57 AM   #143
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief View Post
I do. Butler-Engelland would actually be a fine 3rd pair.

Smid-Russell would be a pair playing too much and will get exposed.
Smid - Wideman
Russell - Engelland

^^^^
Would be absolutely fine for our meagre ambitions this season. Having Smid on one pair and Engelland on another ensures there will be no quarter for opposing forwards in the goal crease. Good mix of toughness and puck movement.

I have every reason to think Wideman could be much better this season, but only if he is finally healthy.

I don't think we need Chris Butler.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2014, 10:19 AM   #144
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
Exp:
Default

The only reason Butler gets credit for blocking so many shots is the one-timers from the slot that hit him in the leg because he just coughed up the puck.

Wotherspoon/Seiloff/somebody else would benefit more from bottom 2 minutes. Whether those players would benefit more from big minutes in the AHL is a different conversation.
DoubleK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2014, 10:28 AM   #145
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

I'd rather sign a cheap veteran to a one year deal to be the #7. Someone who can play both sides like Hannan did for us. Butler is likely looking for a multi year deal
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2014, 10:45 AM   #146
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Butler played quite well at the end of last season, but a guy heading to UFA should have played even better IMO throughout the season.

I'd like to see him back, but on a 'prove it' contract. If he can play a whole season the way he played the last 20 games then I think a lot of teams could use a guy like him.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:43 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy