06-11-2015, 07:17 PM
|
#1521
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
With 14 alive, it takes 8 votes on any one player to hammer. It takes 5 votes to deadline lynch.
Vote Count
Hasn't Voted (3): devo22, SebC, dissentowner
Starseed (4): Oling_Roachinen, Peanut, mrkajz44, Party Elephant
Party Elephant (3): bizaro86 , Starseed, GGG
mrkajz44 (3): squiggs96, Timbo, Hockeyguy15
devo22 (1) : Puxlut
The deadline is Friday, June 12th at 10:00 PM Mountain Time.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 07:35 PM
|
#1522
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Montréal, QC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peanut
I'm not following the logic here, Party. Isn't it to the hosts advantage to try and turn people? What advantage is there to passing the spore amongst themselves?
Other than they would know where the spore is at all times if they only pass it to themselves I guess. But not sure that's really an advantage in terms of actually winning the game. They would want to turn townies, I thought.
|
Yeah, it's unlikely, but it would be an effective misdirection tactic. If we get no reports on the whereabouts of the spore for several days we start to assume there are lots of turned players out there and maybe make a panic lynch. Or, a host could make a false report of passing the spore to a player they want gone and we lynch them right away as we did with girly.
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 07:54 PM
|
#1523
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fantasy Island
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Party Elephant
Yeah, it's unlikely, but it would be an effective misdirection tactic. If we get no reports on the whereabouts of the spore for several days we start to assume there are lots of turned players out there and maybe make a panic lynch. Or, a host could make a false report of passing the spore to a player they want gone and we lynch them right away as we did with girly.
|
Ahh, I see. Metagaming!! Worth keeping in mind, but I agree it seems somewhat unlikely. I guess it depends if they thought there was greater advantage in creating misdirection and confusion, or just targeting people to hope they turn and get numbers on their side.
It has been rather quiet on the spore-front since the girly lynch.
__________________
comfortably numb
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 07:58 PM
|
#1524
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Montréal, QC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peanut
Ahh, I see. Metagaming!! Worth keeping in mind, but I agree it seems somewhat unlikely. I guess it depends if they thought there was greater advantage in creating misdirection and confusion, or just targeting people to hope they turn and get numbers on their side.
It has been rather quiet on the spore-front since the girly lynch.
|
That was to be expected as any spore reveals before day 5 would have meant oling was lying.
Day 3-spore back to captain
Night 4-captain passes spore
Day 4- recipient is either turned, or unaware they have the spore until night
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Party Elephant For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-11-2015, 07:59 PM
|
#1525
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Montréal, QC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Party Elephant
That was to be expected as any spore reveals before day 5 would have meant oling was lying.
Day 3-spore back to captain
Night 4-captain passes spore
Day 4- recipient is either turned, or unaware they have the spore until night
|
That should say night 3-captain passes spore
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 07:59 PM
|
#1526
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Party Elephant
Yeah, it's unlikely, but it would be an effective misdirection tactic. If we get no reports on the whereabouts of the spore for several days we start to assume there are lots of turned players out there and maybe make a panic lynch. Or, a host could make a false report of passing the spore to a player they want gone and we lynch them right away as we did with girly.
|
That would be a pretty big cost for the scum to pay, since it costs them a 50% chance at getting a turned every day they do it.
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 08:16 PM
|
#1527
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22
indeed, the only votes for me so far have come from you. Once on day 1 because I wasn't posting a lot early on and now again on day 4 "to get me talking" so that I "let things slip". Too bad there are no things I could let slip
The accusation of being a "yes man" is pretty funny to me. On day 1, my vote was pretty decisive for activeStick unfortunately. On day 2, I was pretty vocal about a Girly vote. On day 3, I was pretty vocal about a mrkajz vote. Funnily enough, the only instance of me being a "yes man" relates to you when you told us mrkajz voters to "not screw this up again", which was when I took a closer look at ECF and agreed with others that he was indeed looking scummy on the final day of the vote.
Then again, I shouldn't have let your "don't screw this up again" post make me re-think my vote ... I wouldn't have taken a closer look at others if that kind of post had come from anybody else, but with you being confirmed town, I did. ECF would have probably been lynched anyway, but it was a pretty big mistake on my part. That probably won't happen again, because as it has become evident from your current vote: you being confirmed town doesn't automatically make you right 
|
How was your vote on active decisive. You essentially made a case on both of them being scum and went with the marginally better. It was about as far from decisive as you can get.
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 08:27 PM
|
#1528
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
What does everybody think on voting for mrkajz44? My theory is that many think he is a host or are suspicious of him and if he flips town then we can take a harder look at HG who has been lobbying hard against him. After my research I am leaning toward HG being town but I have been wrong about these things before. We have to try and get on track somehow before too many passengers get turned and we seem to be getting no where.
|
I don't think that a MrKajz lynch tells you anything about HG unless MrKajz flips host. If it's town it's just aggressive town v town play we lynch two townies. I think this type of play casts more suspicion on you in trying to set up future lynches. If you want to lynch HG we should lynch HG trying to set up your lynch by lynching mrkajz.
One suspicious thing about HG is he is starting to make a very quiet case to get Squigs lynched rather than being direct.
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 08:30 PM
|
#1529
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Party Elephant
I'm concerned about starseed. As others have already stated, if Lego was scum then there must have been some pressure from his teammates to keep up or sub out. There's been points in this game where I've struggled to keep up, but I never thought to bow out. Maybe if I had two others pressuring me into it I might've. But that's all speculation.
What really concerns me is his vote for me:
Which is based off a link that I know to be bogus. I addressed this, and even asked starseed about it directly:
to which he hasn't responded. If he's scum, he knows there is no link between me and mrkajz. If he's town, he doesn't know, but if he's town why not just answer the question? He's already voting for me so why not back the vote up by saying he thinks our exchange was staged. Instead, he's chosen to ignore it, which has me leaning scum on him.
So at the risk of being labelled a "revenge vote", I'm gonna go with
vote: starseed
|
Why are you concerned about being linked with MrKajz?
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 08:33 PM
|
#1530
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Montréal, QC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
Why are you concerned about being linked with MrKajz?
|
I'm not, I'm concerned with being voted for based on an incorrect assumption.
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 09:03 PM
|
#1531
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
I'm debating...have not made up my mind yet.
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 09:11 PM
|
#1532
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
One suspicious thing about HG is he is starting to make a very quiet case to get Squigs lynched rather than being direct.
|
I'm not doing that at all, he has just said a couple things recently that I felt the need to address.
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 09:12 PM
|
#1533
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
For now.
Vote:mrkajz44
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 09:16 PM
|
#1534
|
First Line Centre
|
PE, I was basing my vote on your voting off of mrkaj and onto the known townie, and also an observation from a (from my perspective) known townie (legoman) who said this:
Quote:
Party Elephant - mentions a scum plan in post 548... a scum bluff? Then... post 768:
vote: hockeyguy15
This vote has me questioning the direction of the group as a whole. I think we've been manipulated too easily into this very specific strategy of voting on a potential spore holder that hinges entirely on taking one poster at his word. I've already laid out how us lynching girly and investigating oling could have us come up empty handed while also losing track of the spore, as if we're even sure where it was in the first place. With the way hockeyguy is forcing the vote on girly, I have to think he's steering he group in the wrong direction.
I think Party took this opportunity to plant the seed of doubt on HG, knowing neither HG and Girly are scum, while keeping his hands clean during the lynch.
|
It was an early case of setting up another safe lynch (provided he were a host and HG were not). All that is said between players is irrelevant to me. I glossed over any posturing between mrkaj and PE, and much other noise between other players.
I think your voting for me while there was a three way tie with you and mrkaj has reinforced my confidence in my vote.
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 09:18 PM
|
#1535
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Montréal, QC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by starseed
PE, I was basing my vote on your voting off of mrkaj and onto the known townie, and also an observation from a (from my perspective) known townie (legoman) who said this:
It was an early case of setting up another safe lynch (provided he were a host and HG were not). All that is said between players is irrelevant to me. I glossed over any posturing between mrkaj and PE, and much other noise between other players.
I think your voting for me while there was a three way tie with you and mrkaj has reinforced my confidence in my vote.
|
You're getting your details wrong. I pulled off of hockeyguy, not mrkajz.
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 09:19 PM
|
#1536
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by starseed
All that is said between players is irrelevant to me.
|
It may be the sake talking, but I think this came out wrong. I meant that the noise generated by arguing with someone else is irrelevant, and that I am trying to read between the lines.
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 09:20 PM
|
#1537
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Party Elephant
You're getting your details wrong. I pulled off of hockeyguy, not mrkajz.
|
Its possible, I will go to bed and read over that again tomorrow.
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 09:22 PM
|
#1538
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Montréal, QC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by starseed
Its possible, I will go to bed and read over that again tomorrow.
|
That's probably a good idea. It's also possible that the earth is round.
|
|
|
06-11-2015, 09:23 PM
|
#1539
|
First Line Centre
|
Sorry, a Korean female is visiting from out of town. God please see me through this. :'(
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to starseed For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-11-2015, 09:27 PM
|
#1540
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fantasy Island
|
Mmmm, sake.
__________________
comfortably numb
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:37 AM.
|
|