|
View Poll Results: Who will you be voting for?
|
|
Naheed Nenshi
|
   
|
98 |
32.03% |
|
Bob Hawksworth
|
  
|
4 |
1.31% |
|
Barb Higgins
|
  
|
75 |
24.51% |
|
Craig Burrows
|
  
|
3 |
0.98% |
|
Ric McIver
|
  
|
38 |
12.42% |
|
Paul Hughes
|
  
|
1 |
0.33% |
|
Kent Hehr
|
|
22 |
7.19% |
|
Alnoor Kassam
|
|
3 |
0.98% |
|
Wayne Stewart
|
|
2 |
0.65% |
|
Jon Lord
|
|
1 |
0.33% |
|
Joe Connelly
|
|
4 |
1.31% |
|
Bob Hawksworth
|
|
1 |
0.33% |
|
Undecided
|
|
54 |
17.65% |
07-31-2010, 11:10 AM
|
#121
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelekin
..... and if we have a surplus, it means we're not spending enough. Simple as that.
|
Or a surplus could mean we are over-taxed.
|
|
|
|
07-31-2010, 11:26 AM
|
#122
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Regulator75
Lanny should run for Mayor, his East side Dodge commercials are gold.
He'd take Barb down!
|
"Go on down to your voting location and tell 'em Lanny sent ya!"
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bigtime For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-31-2010, 02:19 PM
|
#123
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Yeesh. I hope Nenshi and Hehr can get some public noticeably fast. Otherwise they won't even have a chance as it will only be a McIver and Higgins race alone. *shudder*
If Higgins doesn't have much of a campaign that grows Calgary like Nenshi or Hehr show visions of, and she or McIver wins, I've lost faith in democracy.
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2010, 02:54 PM
|
#124
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by First Lady
Or a surplus could mean we are over-taxed.
|
Is that you Rick?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ducay For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-31-2010, 03:30 PM
|
#125
|
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: KenKingsinton
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by First Lady
Or a surplus could mean we are over-taxed.
|
Over-taxed? In Alberta? I think it's well known nationally that we under-spend.
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2010, 08:07 PM
|
#126
|
|
tromboner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
|
Can someone please explain to me what extra money we're talking about that should perhaps be put into infrastructure or given back as tax breaks that is somehow relevant to municipal politics?
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2010, 08:31 PM
|
#127
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
Can someone please explain to me what extra money we're talking about that should perhaps be put into infrastructure or given back as tax breaks that is somehow relevant to municipal politics?
|
Its the $25M McIver is getting back when he cancels the Calatrava Bridge
Less the $20M already spent
And the $10M to break the contract
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2010, 08:39 PM
|
#128
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
Can someone please explain to me what extra money we're talking about that should perhaps be put into infrastructure or given back as tax breaks that is somehow relevant to municipal politics?
|
I think the talk of a surplus arose from someone talking about it hypothetically. So, there's no "extra" money kicking around, at least in the context of this conversation.
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2010, 09:34 PM
|
#129
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by frinkprof
I think the talk of a surplus arose from someone talking about it hypothetically. So, there's no "extra" money kicking around, at least in the context of this conversation.
|
That was my understanding as well, since the word "if" was used.
As I understand it we (city) is heading into a 60M shortfall next year.
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2010, 10:23 PM
|
#130
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta
Someone is going to have to explain to me again why giving your vote to Barb Higgins is a wise decision. Nenshi is far more engaged in the issues that really matter. He's an open-minded thinker, and would actually have the balls (no pun intended) to implement social projects and other projects that this city needs.
|
Why vote for Barb? Its pretty simple. As you have said yourself McIvor is terrible. McIvor has an early lead and McIvor is the worst option for this city. So how do you do what's best for the city? To me the answer is to vote for the most popular candidate that isn't McIvor.
If Nenshi got up to a convincing third with 20% support I would consider voting for him but if he hasn't made any ground up by election day the risk of putting McIvor into office is not worth voting for a fringe candidate.
As long as Barb as reasonble positions on TOD's, Suberbia, and Transit are reasonable (and we don't know that yet) then I think voting for her would be prudent.
Besides that having a good spokesperson for mayor is important for branding, and representing the city. In these categories Higgens is superior to all of the other candidates.
|
|
|
|
|
08-01-2010, 03:44 PM
|
#133
|
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by First Lady
This is creating quite a buzz in Twitterville this morning....secret Mayoralty forum.
|
As it should - there's no reason for it to be behind closed doors.
|
|
|
|
|
08-01-2010, 04:05 PM
|
#134
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
How can they even call it a "forum" if it's being held behind closed doors?
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
|
|
08-02-2010, 12:33 PM
|
#135
|
 Posted the 6 millionth post! |
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
Why vote for Barb? Its pretty simple. As you have said yourself McIvor is terrible. McIvor has an early lead and McIvor is the worst option for this city. So how do you do what's best for the city? To me the answer is to vote for the most popular candidate that isn't McIvor.
If Nenshi got up to a convincing third with 20% support I would consider voting for him but if he hasn't made any ground up by election day the risk of putting McIvor into office is not worth voting for a fringe candidate.
As long as Barb as reasonble positions on TOD's, Suberbia, and Transit are reasonable (and we don't know that yet) then I think voting for her would be prudent.
Besides that having a good spokesperson for mayor is important for branding, and representing the city. In these categories Higgens is superior to all of the other candidates.
|
It sounds like you're trying to justify a protest vote. What if she doesn't have anything reasonable? Granted, she likely will, but voting for Barb based on pre-conceptions is a major folly of democracy - people think they know what they're getting, but inevitably vote for a terrible candidate.
It is every Calgary voter's task to do their due dilligence and really make an informed decision. That, however, is a next-to-impossible task. People vote based on hair styles and the color of people's teeth.
|
|
|
|
|
08-04-2010, 07:21 PM
|
#136
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Behind Nikkor Glass
|
Anyone else getting calls from McIver's group?
They called my cell around 4:00PM. Asked me if I knew who McIver was and if I'm going to vote for him.
I said, "isn't he the guy who is constantly blinking and hogging all the cameras at City hall?"
Silence.
"No, I won't be voting for him. My vote is for Nenshi. Thanks!" *click*
Last edited by Regulator75; 08-04-2010 at 07:37 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Regulator75 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-04-2010, 07:26 PM
|
#137
|
|
First Line Centre
|
^Who's McIvor?
|
|
|
|
|
08-04-2010, 07:38 PM
|
#138
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Behind Nikkor Glass
|
Yayaya. Fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 09:43 AM
|
#139
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelekin
Over-taxed? In Alberta? I think it's well known nationally that we under-spend.
|
The highest per person health care budget in Canada would tend to disagree with you along with the quality of roads in Alberta.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
|
|
|
|
|
08-05-2010, 09:48 AM
|
#140
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
|
1 billion seems like a lot for a reserve fund, what was the 2009 audited budget at? If budget for city is 50 bil then 1 bil isnt that much. If budget is 10 bil then that is alot. Not so much that there should be a tax breab but I think the surplus should be set as a % of revenue and if it goes over then they use that money for onetime spending - likely some form of infrastructure.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:09 AM.
|
|
