Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-04-2024, 03:42 PM   #1361
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAreOne View Post
That's still horrendous.
I don't disagree.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2024, 03:47 PM   #1362
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I have heard by multiple people the hardline was actually $8.5M x 8.
I had heard from someone who heard this from Bean directly. Flames offered $8.3Mx8 and Lindholm countered at $9.3M. Flames came back at $8.6M and Lindholm came back with $9.3M. Just no budging at all from the Lindholm camp. The way Lindy talked about it was “he was willing to stay” so even when he addressed the fact he was willing to stay instead of wanting to stay and the negotiations broke off right at the beginning of the year and never picked up
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2024, 03:58 PM   #1363
Ferarri
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I have heard by multiple people the hardline was actually $8.5M x 8.
Given his play, that could have been a close contender to being almost as bad as the Huberdeau contract. Massively dodged a bullet.
Ferarri is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ferarri For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2024, 04:03 PM   #1364
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Lindholm didn't want to stay. Proof in the fact there was zero negotiating on his end. I am grateful Flames managed to stick to their guns and move on, it wasn't even a debate given his performance this season. In a contract year of all years. Dude couldn't even muster up enough effort to try and earn his lofty contract demands.

Makes me feel really bummed out that my favorite Flame player went out like that.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2024, 04:22 PM   #1365
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I had heard from someone who heard this from Bean directly. Flames offered $8.3Mx8 and Lindholm countered at $9.3M. Flames came back at $8.6M and Lindholm came back with $9.3M. Just no budging at all from the Lindholm camp. The way Lindy talked about it was “he was willing to stay” so even when he addressed the fact he was willing to stay instead of wanting to stay and the negotiations broke off right at the beginning of the year and never picked up
I wonder if anyone on the Flames side lowkey sabotaged the negotiations. Maybe the owners were pushing to move the Flames offer up, and this person made sure that didn't happen. Or maybe someone went as far as to hype up the Lindholm camp to have him increase his own offers.

I'm probably over thinking this. However, so many of the statements coming out of the coaching and management staff almost talk about a rebuild like its a secret thing happening behind the surface of the official motto, which is to always be competitive. Like the only way to get a rebuild going is to form a secret cabal and go behind the owners' backs.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2024, 04:35 PM   #1366
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
willing to stay instead of wanting to stay
This is a very astute point. It's important to know the difference when players say this.
Muta is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Muta For This Useful Post:
Old 04-04-2024, 04:48 PM   #1367
chedder
Franchise Player
 
chedder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Definitely dodged a bullet on an 8 year major overpay for a player that told you he'll only stay if you massively overpay him. Good riddance.

The 1st round pick and the young defenceman are, hopefully, going to be a way better way to improve this team.
chedder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2024, 04:51 PM   #1368
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

9.3 over 8 years wow. Now he's worth a 3.9 over 8 years

I wouldn't want the Flames to give him a 5 x 5. I think he will get a 5 x 6.5 from a Columbus or a 3 x 7mil from a regular team. Or a one year 6.9 from Boston
MrMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2024, 05:34 PM   #1369
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
IMO ownership would see Celebrini as the start and end of a retool and that adding that talent to this lineup would mean going for it. In addition to what could be spent in free agency.
Not with our D core in the state that it is currently in
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2024, 02:46 AM   #1370
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Saw a headline that the hurricanes healthy-scratched Kotkaniemi against the bruins due him not playing as well as they’d like after a breakout season last year. Depending on how he responds and how both he and the Hurricanes do in the playoffs this year…. I wonder if they’ll be looking to trade him in the offseason? I really don’t know his value as I don’t follow the hurricanes much. He is a former high draft pick that is 23 years old and known to be a two-way center. He is signed for 6 years after this season at a cap hit of 4.8 million.

Not sure if he will even be available but, if he was, I wonder if the flames would target him? He fits the mold of a player a team acquires as part of a retool. While his contract is long, the cap hit is not crazy high if management thinks he could reach his potential as a solid two-way center. If he did, he could potentially be a Backlund replacement when he chooses to retire.

Would his acquisition cost be high? I really don’t know. Surely there would be at least a few teams interested considering what he has shown flashes of in the past. Would Vancouver’s 2024 1st round pick + B-level prospect get it done? That might favour the flames too much - he is a young NHL center even if Carolina is frustrated with him. Don’t think you could expect him to be anything more than a 2nd/3rd line center though.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stemit14 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-05-2024, 07:33 AM   #1371
Wastedyouth
Truculent!
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
Saw a headline that the hurricanes healthy-scratched Kotkaniemi against the bruins due him not playing as well as they’d like after a breakout season last year. Depending on how he responds and how both he and the Hurricanes do in the playoffs this year…. I wonder if they’ll be looking to trade him in the offseason? I really don’t know his value as I don’t follow the hurricanes much. He is a former high draft pick that is 23 years old and known to be a two-way center. He is signed for 6 years after this season at a cap hit of 4.8 million.

Not sure if he will even be available but, if he was, I wonder if the flames would target him? He fits the mold of a player a team acquires as part of a retool. While his contract is long, the cap hit is not crazy high if management thinks he could reach his potential as a solid two-way center. If he did, he could potentially be a Backlund replacement when he chooses to retire.

Would his acquisition cost be high? I really don’t know. Surely there would be at least a few teams interested considering what he has shown flashes of in the past. Would Vancouver’s 2024 1st round pick + B-level prospect get it done? That might favour the flames too much - he is a young NHL center even if Carolina is frustrated with him. Don’t think you could expect him to be anything more than a 2nd/3rd line center though.
He's really not good. His draft capital has kept him in the NHL longer than he should have been.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
It's the Law of E=NG. If there was an Edmonton on Mars, it would stink like Uranus.
Wastedyouth is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wastedyouth For This Useful Post:
Old 04-05-2024, 08:04 AM   #1372
Flames1217
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
Saw a headline that the hurricanes healthy-scratched Kotkaniemi against the bruins due him not playing as well as they’d like after a breakout season last year. Depending on how he responds and how both he and the Hurricanes do in the playoffs this year…. I wonder if they’ll be looking to trade him in the offseason? I really don’t know his value as I don’t follow the hurricanes much. He is a former high draft pick that is 23 years old and known to be a two-way center. He is signed for 6 years after this season at a cap hit of 4.8 million.

Not sure if he will even be available but, if he was, I wonder if the flames would target him? He fits the mold of a player a team acquires as part of a retool. While his contract is long, the cap hit is not crazy high if management thinks he could reach his potential as a solid two-way center. If he did, he could potentially be a Backlund replacement when he chooses to retire.

Would his acquisition cost be high? I really don’t know. Surely there would be at least a few teams interested considering what he has shown flashes of in the past. Would Vancouver’s 2024 1st round pick + B-level prospect get it done? That might favour the flames too much - he is a young NHL center even if Carolina is frustrated with him. Don’t think you could expect him to be anything more than a 2nd/3rd line center though.
I would be really hesitant to give up a first for him.

He's essentially a reclamation project at this point in time and one that comes with a significant contract thus there a considerable risk. If Carolina was looking to move him I would wait and see what the offer was and try to give up as little as possible (maybe a 3rd)

He could end up becoming a 50 point responsible centre but he could also remain a 25-30 point third liner who makes nearly 5 million. Hard to gauge his value.
Flames1217 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2024, 08:12 AM   #1373
Niemo
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Niemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames1217 View Post
I would be really hesitant to give up a first for him.

He's essentially a reclamation project at this point in time and one that comes with a significant contract thus there a considerable risk. If Carolina was looking to move him I would wait and see what the offer was and try to give up as little as possible (maybe a 3rd)

He could end up becoming a 50 point responsible centre but he could also remain a 25-30 point third liner who makes nearly 5 million. Hard to gauge his value.
There have been talk of the Canes buying him out because at his age, the buyout is 1/3 the contract value. KK will not cost a late 1st to acquire if we were indeed interested. I would expect a deal to look like:

Mangiapane (25%) retained + Cole Schwindt (or Solovyov)
for
KK
Niemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2024, 08:13 AM   #1374
traptor
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
Saw a headline that the hurricanes healthy-scratched Kotkaniemi against the bruins due him not playing as well as they’d like after a breakout season last year. Depending on how he responds and how both he and the Hurricanes do in the playoffs this year…. I wonder if they’ll be looking to trade him in the offseason? I really don’t know his value as I don’t follow the hurricanes much. He is a former high draft pick that is 23 years old and known to be a two-way center. He is signed for 6 years after this season at a cap hit of 4.8 million.

Not sure if he will even be available but, if he was, I wonder if the flames would target him? He fits the mold of a player a team acquires as part of a retool. While his contract is long, the cap hit is not crazy high if management thinks he could reach his potential as a solid two-way center. If he did, he could potentially be a Backlund replacement when he chooses to retire.

Would his acquisition cost be high? I really don’t know. Surely there would be at least a few teams interested considering what he has shown flashes of in the past. Would Vancouver’s 2024 1st round pick + B-level prospect get it done? That might favour the flames too much - he is a young NHL center even if Carolina is frustrated with him. Don’t think you could expect him to be anything more than a 2nd/3rd line center though.
Canes only gave up a late 1st+3rd to get him.

I'd do it for a 2nd or a guy like mang but not much more.
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2024, 08:31 AM   #1375
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor View Post
Canes only gave up a late 1st+3rd to get him.

I'd do it for a 2nd or a guy like mang but not much more.
Kadri swap lol
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2024, 08:32 AM   #1376
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wastedyouth View Post
He's really not good. His draft capital has kept him in the NHL longer than he should have been.
The Flames are rumoured to be interested in adding a young, established C to the roster. Kotkaniemi is the kind of player who might be available. He’s not a #1-2C. But you aren’t going to get one of those anyway.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.

Last edited by CliffFletcher; 04-05-2024 at 08:36 AM.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 04-05-2024, 08:39 AM   #1377
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

I'd be happy to give Kotka a good shot here. He could definitely have a backlund like career. He's still only 23 years old. Had 43 points in the show last year. He's a year and 2 months older than Zary and we're treating him like he's got no potential upside while Zary has loads...
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2024, 08:45 AM   #1378
howard_the_duck
#1 Goaltender
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMike View Post
9.3 over 8 years wow. Now he's worth a 3.9 over 8 years

I wouldn't want the Flames to give him a 5 x 5. I think he will get a 5 x 6.5 from a Columbus or a 3 x 7mil from a regular team. Or a one year 6.9 from Boston
Lindholm's season has cost him both AAV and term. He (and the teams interested) would be foolish to sign a long term contract.

I think in the grand scheme, Lindholm's cost himself $40M if not more.

He's in Duchene territory where he needs to sign a short term deal in a situation that is favorable to him to re-build his value.
howard_the_duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2024, 09:04 AM   #1379
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I had heard from someone who heard this from Bean directly. Flames offered $8.3Mx8 and Lindholm countered at $9.3M. Flames came back at $8.6M and Lindholm came back with $9.3M. Just no budging at all from the Lindholm camp. The way Lindy talked about it was “he was willing to stay” so even when he addressed the fact he was willing to stay instead of wanting to stay and the negotiations broke off right at the beginning of the year and never picked up
If true I imagine Elias and his camp are going to feel very humbled this summer when he eventually signs on somewhere. That said he looked like a guy that just wanted to get the hell out of Calgary so maybe he won't care about the millions of dollars he left on the table.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2024, 09:33 AM   #1380
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck View Post

He's in Duchene territory where he needs to sign a short term deal in a situation that is favorable to him to re-build his value.
Pretty much. His best scenario is something like 2x 6.75 with Boston, get lots of ice time with quality wingers on a strong team. But even that might be high.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.

Last edited by CliffFletcher; 04-05-2024 at 09:36 AM.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
e=ng , edmonton is no good


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:08 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy