Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Reaction to the trade?
Hate it 3 0.51%
Dislike it 11 1.87%
Whelmed 161 27.38%
Like it 350 59.52%
Love it 63 10.71%
Voters: 588. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-26-2024, 10:29 AM   #1261
YyjFlames
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
It would be close, but again, we need to know how much retention is involved. And it isn't better.
And a 7th rounder?
YyjFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 10:38 AM   #1262
Flames Fan, Ph.D.
#1 Goaltender
 
Flames Fan, Ph.D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Underground
Exp:
Default

I think the Flames have enough exposure to this year’s draft. I’m good with focusing on 25 and beyond.
Flames Fan, Ph.D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 10:46 AM   #1263
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
If the source is Treliving himself, we all know he has a long track record of offering low value, and then claiming it was just as good or better than what was taken.

Not bashing Treliving here, but Conroy isn't taking less just to avoid dealing with his old boss.
You got it
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 11:05 AM   #1264
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey View Post
23rd in 2024 vs ?? In 2025. Didn't someone post Calgary thinks the top 20 is really good in this draft and after is wide open? Maybe rolling the dice with the 2025 Jersey pick had more upside to them.

The sweetener from Toronto is the question also.
Bob said that the top 20 are in a group and then 21-50.

Quote:
It seems there’s a divide of sorts between the top 20 on TSN’s list and the next group of as many 20-plus prospects. Famous last words, but it would be shocking if the first 20 on our list aren’t surefire first-rounders. Beyond that, though, the prospects ranked 21-32 would appear to be somewhat interchangeable with those ranked 33 to 50.
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
dustygoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 12:00 PM   #1265
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Leafs media and fans think they have the right to match any deal before it goes through. Flames made two trades with Vancouver, they don't care about politics they want what THEY THINK is the best deal.

Brad could have had Tanev for a first, might even have won a round.
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2024, 12:09 PM   #1266
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

I'd have preferred the NJD 1st in '25 to TOR's 1st in '24 anyways.

I love the idea of spreading picks across these next three years - so having two 1st rounders in each of 24, 25, 26 is awesome. Also, the TOR 1st is locked at 23rd OA, and there's a cost of opportunity when looking at it over the NJD pick. That NJD has a chance of being 11th-22nd - so I take that upside while also knowing you're going to have a full year to assess the 2025 draft while knowing you have two 1st round picks (most likely).
ComixZone is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2024, 12:20 PM   #1267
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

There is also an early expectation that next year's draft is deeper.

1) a pretty good chance that the NJD pick is better
2) almost certainly less retention
3) Bahl is very intriguing, and only costs $1M this year, while we see how he progresses

TOR's add would have to be a pretty good player (which I highly doubt)
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 12:23 PM   #1268
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Plus isn't there a rumbling that Toronto and Ottawa were brought in to improve New Jersey's focus but Markstrom was only really willing to go to the Devils?
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2024, 12:34 PM   #1269
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Plus isn't there a rumbling that Toronto and Ottawa were brought in to improve New Jersey's focus but Markstrom was only really willing to go to the Devils?
I think things got a little twisted over time. I think it was reported that Markstrom didn't really want to be traded anywhere, but that he would waive to go to New Jersey. Over time, as rumours form, it became "Markstrom only wants to go to New Jersey".
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 12:37 PM   #1270
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Plus isn't there a rumbling that Toronto and Ottawa were brought in to improve New Jersey's focus but Markstrom was only really willing to go to the Devils?
Same day that was reported, someone reported its dispute

I think he clearly wanted to be in the eat though, for the direct flight to Sweden
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 01:17 PM   #1271
Torture
Loves Teh Chat!
 
Torture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Treliving the runner up in a big trade? You don't say!
Torture is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Torture For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2024, 01:21 PM   #1272
Tbull8
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
I'd have preferred the NJD 1st in '25 to TOR's 1st in '24 anyways.

I love the idea of spreading picks across these next three years - so having two 1st rounders in each of 24, 25, 26 is awesome. Also, the TOR 1st is locked at 23rd OA, and there's a cost of opportunity when looking at it over the NJD pick. That NJD has a chance of being 11th-22nd - so I take that upside while also knowing you're going to have a full year to assess the 2025 draft while knowing you have two 1st round picks (most likely).
Theres also a chance (slim but still a chance) that the devils stumble and that pick ends up being an unprotected 2026. Any extra shots at the Mckenna draft are going to be near impossible to get. Similar to how difficult it was to get picks last year
Tbull8 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tbull8 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2024, 01:49 PM   #1273
Groot
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Groot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8 View Post
Theres also a chance (slim but still a chance) that the devils stumble and that pick ends up being an unprotected 2026. Any extra shots at the Mckenna draft are going to be near impossible to get. Similar to how difficult it was to get picks last year
1) NJD finishes bottom 10 next year. Pick moves to 2026.
2) VGK and NJD finish bottom 10 in 2025/2026.
3) Flames finish last in 2026.
4) Lottery picks go to NJD and VGK draft selections (held by the Flames)
5) Flames draft 1st, 2nd, 3rd overall.
Groot is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 03:13 PM   #1274
Rutuu
First Line Centre
 
Rutuu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Groot View Post
1) NJD finishes bottom 10 next year. Pick moves to 2026.
2) VGK and NJD finish bottom 10 in 2025/2026.
3) Flames finish last in 2026.
4) Lottery picks go to NJD and VGK draft selections (held by the Flames)
5) Flames draft 1st, 2nd, 3rd overall.
Add Murray Edwards sells the team and Sportsnet fires Eric Francis...and that is the best non-zero chance timeline I can think of.
Rutuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 03:16 PM   #1275
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Based on the Ullmark deal, this Markstrom trade looks great! We get a decent young defenseman, a slightly more promising 1st round pick and no bad contracts coming back
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 04:30 PM   #1276
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Plus isn't there a rumbling that Toronto and Ottawa were brought in to improve New Jersey's focus but Markstrom was only really willing to go to the Devils?

I forgot which insider said it (Dreger? Lebrun?) that Markstrom was 'intrigued' about the Maple Leafs when he heard they were interested. They made it sound like Ottawa wasn't a consideration, however (though maybe it would if Ottawa stated that they would sign Tanev too? I bet that would have made him more interested).
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2024, 03:23 PM   #1277
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
Exp:
Default

Bahl working out in a Flames shirt at the Devils practice facility with Lazar.

__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?

Last edited by DoubleK; 07-02-2024 at 03:54 PM.
DoubleK is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to DoubleK For This Useful Post:
Old 07-02-2024, 06:08 PM   #1278
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK View Post
Bahl working out in a Flames shirt at the Devils practice facility with Lazar.

Bahl and chain?
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2024, 07:18 PM   #1279
YourMother
Crash and Bang Winger
 
YourMother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Is it 100% a fact that if the devils finish bottom 10, that we receive their 2026 unprotected pick? If so, damn that’s exciting.
YourMother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2024, 07:30 PM   #1280
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YourMother View Post
Is it 100% a fact that if the devils finish bottom 10, that we receive their 2026 unprotected pick? If so, damn that’s exciting.
That's what NHL.com is saying, yes.

Subject to lottery results, of course – if the Devils finish outside the bottom 10 but move up due to the lottery, that also means the Flames get the unprotected '26 pick instead.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:22 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy