12-08-2023, 02:08 PM
|
#12761
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
If they don't think they can afford a signed Nylander, they might do it.
They have to decide if they can keep both Nylander and Marner. If they think they can't, this is a great, win now, trade for them.
|
I assume Nylander has to agree to the trade.
|
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:09 PM
|
#12762
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick M.
I assume Nylander has to agree to the trade.
|
Depends. Calgary doesn’t look like a buyer, so maybe he left them off.
|
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:10 PM
|
#12763
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick M.
I assume Nylander has to agree to the trade.
|
10-team no trade list
But if you're Nylander, and you aren't re-signing with Toronto, who cares where you end up for the rest of this season? If they want to send you somewhere that doesn't interest you, you just walk it to UFA.
|
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:10 PM
|
#12764
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Exactly.
Nylander is 18 months younger than Lindholm - not much, but something. And the rest of the return (other than Brodie) is picks and a prospect. Sounds a lot like what you would want if you were retooling. And a lot like what many fans are hoping for.
|
The challenge, though, is what he'll be wanting to re-sign with the Flames (if he even wants to). Can the Flames afford another veteran winger at just over $10M?
|
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:13 PM
|
#12765
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David
The challenge, though, is what he'll be wanting to re-sign with the Flames (if he even wants to). Can the Flames afford another veteran winger at just over $10M?
|
Yup. Because if he walks, all they get for Lindholm, Hanifin and Tanev is 2 1sts and a prospect - no where near enough.
So it requires prior negotiation with Nylander.
And the problem with that is the same as with Huberdeau - you're signing a long term deal without seeing how he fits with your team.
It's a very intriguing trade, but a HUGE risk for the Flames.
In fairness, it is also a huge risk for the Leafs, as they would have THREE guys to sign.
|
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:15 PM
|
#12766
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Yup. Because if he walks, all they get for Lindholm, Hanifin and Tanev is 2 1sts and a prospect - no where near enough.
So it requires prior negotiation with Nylander.
And the problem with that is the same as with Huberdeau - you're signing a long term deal without seeing how he fits with your team.
It's a very intriguing trade, but a HUGE risk for the Flames.
|
Or they trade Nylander as well. That would be a fun distraction from work
|
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:16 PM
|
#12767
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Yup. Because if he walks, all they get for Lindholm, Hanifin and Tanev is 2 1sts and a prospect - no where near enough.
So it requires prior negotiation with Nylander.
And the problem with that is the same as with Huberdeau - you're signing a long term deal without seeing how he fits with your team.
It's a very intriguing trade, but a HUGE risk for the Flames.
In fairness, it is also a huge risk for the Leafs, as they would have THREE guys to sign.
|
Alter that original trade so that the Flames are only retaining on two contracts and then flip Nylander with retention at the TDL. I think you could get a pretty hefty return on him.
|
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:20 PM
|
#12768
|
Franchise Player
|
It actually only says retention on Tanev and Hanifin
|
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:20 PM
|
#12769
|
Franchise Player
|
retain 50% on Nylander, then send him to Tampa, Boston or Detroit, just for the LOLs
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:27 PM
|
#12770
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
They are all in to win a Cup, I could totally see the Leafs doing that.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdubbs
Nobody does realistically, but at least that proposal isn't from Flames land, so nobody can accuse us of overvaluing our own players or undervaluing the Leafs players.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
If they don't think they can afford a signed Nylander, they might do it.
They have to decide if they can keep both Nylander and Marner. If they think they can't, this is a great, win now, trade for them.
|
Even with this trade, a lot has to go right for TOR to win a cup. This trade would greatly reduce their ability to go for a cup in the following 2–3 years. I don't think Tre risks something like that, because when it backfires, then Leafsnation would demand his head.
Tre didn't want to risk Valmaki in order to land Stone, but now he's willing to throw all caution to the wind to get Hanifin, Tanev, and Lindholm?
I also don't think that TOR values Marner better than Nylander at this point. Nor do I think CGY would have a chance of signing Nylander if we trade away all those pieces, because that would in all likelihood mean a full rebuild.
|
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:29 PM
|
#12771
|
#1 Goaltender
|
I think that trade would be a big return for Calgary. They are likely getting the best player in the trade in Nylander… he has had the best past two seasons of the players involved. The flames could even immediately trade him at the deadline for a 1st round pick + top prospect. Could even flip Brodie if they wanted to. Would be a big shuffle of two teams. Not sure I’ve ever seen many trades like that but it would be interesting.
Hard to imagine the leafs trading Nylander when they are trying to win now. Even though they are afraid to lose him for nothing.
|
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:29 PM
|
#12772
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly
Nor do I think CGY would have a chance of signing Nylander if we trade away all those pieces, because that would in all likelihood mean a full rebuild.
|
That's why he'd be an easy flip, especially if there's still an existing retention spot.
|
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:31 PM
|
#12773
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manhattanboy
Has this been posted?
From Editor in Leaf. Nylander, Brodie, 2 first round picks and a prospect to the Flames for Lindholm, Hanafin and Tanev, which apparently will break the internet and win the Leafs the Cup.
https://flip.it/861X_P
The Trade
Toronto Maple Leafs acquire: Noah Hanifin ($4.95M – Flames retain 50%) & Chris Tanev ($4.5M – Flames retain 25%), Elias Lindholm ($4.85)
Calgary Flames acquire: William Nylander ($6.9M), TJ Brodie ($5M), Topi Niemela, 2024 First Round Pick and 2026 First Round Pick
|
Woah this would be a fun scenario to witness.
Sent from my SM-G990W2 using Tapatalk
|
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:36 PM
|
#12774
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14
I think that trade would be a big return for Calgary. They are likely getting the best player in the trade in Nylander… he has had the best past two seasons of the players involved. The flames could even immediately trade him at the deadline for a 1st round pick + top prospect. Could even flip Brodie if they wanted to. Would be a big shuffle of two teams. Not sure I’ve ever seen many trades like that but it would be interesting.
Hard to imagine the leafs trading Nylander when they are trying to win now. Even though they are afraid to lose him for nothing.
|
They would be acquiring Lindholm - an excellent 200 ft C, Hanifin, who would be their #2 defenseman, and Tanev, a guy who Chuck Norris would buy a beer.
If you are going for it, I can't imagine a scenario where you are adding more than that.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:39 PM
|
#12775
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly
Even with this trade, a lot has to go right for TOR to win a cup. This trade would greatly reduce their ability to go for a cup in the following 2–3 years. I don't think Tre risks something like that, because when it backfires, then Leafsnation would demand his head.
Tre didn't want to risk Valmaki in order to land Stone, but now he's willing to throw all caution to the wind to get Hanifin, Tanev, and Lindholm?
I also don't think that TOR values Marner better than Nylander at this point. Nor do I think CGY would have a chance of signing Nylander if we trade away all those pieces, because that would in all likelihood mean a full rebuild.
|
That's not what happened.
|
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:41 PM
|
#12776
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
I'd do that Leafs editor trade AND re up Nylanders contract.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
|
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:43 PM
|
#12777
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manhattanboy
Has this been posted?
From Editor in Leaf. Nylander, Brodie, 2 first round picks and a prospect to the Flames for Lindholm, Hanafin and Tanev, which apparently will break the internet and win the Leafs the Cup.
https://flip.it/861X_P
The Trade
Toronto Maple Leafs acquire: Noah Hanifin ($4.95M – Flames retain 50%) & Chris Tanev ($4.5M – Flames retain 25%), Elias Lindholm ($4.85)
Calgary Flames acquire: William Nylander ($6.9M), TJ Brodie ($5M), Topi Niemela, 2024 First Round Pick and 2026 First Round Pick
|
Where's the dotted line?
Where do we sign?!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TrentCrimmIndependent For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:43 PM
|
#12778
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
It actually only says retention on Tanev and Hanifin
|
Oops. I can only hold my attention for the first 75% of a post so I misread it.
|
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:46 PM
|
#12779
|
Franchise Player
|
that trade actually frees up about $2M in cap space for the Leafs, allowing them to add another player, as well
|
|
|
12-08-2023, 02:50 PM
|
#12780
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
|
If Nylander is hesitant to allow the trade to go through, you just tell him we will flip him 50% retained to a contender or to a team that wants a sign and trade. If Toronto is trading him they don't want to re-sign him. Take the 8 year extension to the highest bidder rather than the 7 at free agency.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:12 PM.
|
|