Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-28-2008, 09:11 PM   #101
Stranger
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Stranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ford Prefect View Post
Cool ... I'm a Battle River boy too, although from a ways upstream on the Alberta side. My brother still lives on the family farm and was outside when it happened. He said he could hear crackling and thought it might have landed just a few miles to the east. Sounds like it might have landed about 50 miles to the east though rather than just a few miles.
What town are you from? Our farm is about 7 miles from the Sask border in the Edgerton area and only about 1 mile from the Battle River Coulee.
Stranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2008, 09:25 PM   #102
tete
Powerplay Quarterback
 
tete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevanGuy View Post
They said on 660 yesterday that some meteor-dude in the States will pay $10,000 for a piece of it. He then went on to say there could be as much as $1,000,000 worth of material out there from this thing. Road trip!
This is probably the same guy who was contacting my dad, wanting to pay a pile of cash for space rock. Legit? No clue. My dad found a meteorite about 15 years ago. The rest of us thought it was just a rock, he was convinced it was a meteorite. Left it kicking around in the garage for years. Fast forward 8 years and he takes it into the Prairie Meteorite Clinic hosted by the UofC in a town next to ours. Finds out it actually WAS one. Generally speaking, meteorites tend to go for $1/gram. His was 20 kg. Largest intact one found in Manitoba. Just finished up the donation to the Manitoba Museum a few weeks ago and while he didn't get $20 K in cash, he did pretty well in tax credits and a small amount of cash. Not exactly enough money to retire but still pretty darn neat.
tete is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tete For This Useful Post:
Old 11-28-2008, 09:35 PM   #103
Bagor
Franchise Player
 
Bagor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Spartanville
Exp:
Default

Out of curiosity, how were they able to estimate the weight at ~10 tonne (from the article)?

The size from the images? amount of light? speed?
Combination of all of the above?

I saw one in eastern England about 7 years ago which was very different but just as spectacular. Was white then finished up as red and green. Nowhere near as bright as that one but just as spectacular.
__________________


Bagor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2008, 09:39 PM   #104
Montana Moe
First Line Centre
 
Montana Moe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Exp:
Default

Many people on Northern Montana reported seeing it as well. That is a huge area for it to be seen, N. Alberta to N. Montana, wow!

http://www.greatfallstribune.com/app...=2008811220301

Geoff Chester, a spokesman for the U.S. Naval Observatory in Washington, D.C.:
Quote:
"It sounds like you guys had a great light show," he said. "I'm intensely jealous."
Montana Moe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2008, 10:24 PM   #105
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagor View Post
Out of curiosity, how were they able to estimate the weight at ~10 tonne (from the article)?

The size from the images? amount of light? speed?
Combination of all of the above?
Probably amount of light. The size from the images would be useless as it wasn't actually the size of the object that you saw on the videos, just the light being bright enough to wash out the sensor on the camera. The actual object was 1.5 - 2m across, no way you're going to see that any distance away let alone in Edmonton.

The amount of light probably gives an idea of how much material is burning, and they probably have a good idea of how much material would burn for all different sizes of incoming rocks. If you know the size, and the approximate density you can get the mass. Approximate density would be a WAG from the way it burned up and knowledge of general composition of past meteors... if it was an ice ball it would have looked different.

Speed, things fall at the same rate regardless of their mass in a vacuum, and the air resistance will depend on the shape as well as the mass so it's hard to say. Something that small isn't big enough to form itself into a sphere so who knows what shape it was originally.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
Old 11-28-2008, 10:48 PM   #106
Nancy
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Nancy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sunnyvale nursing home
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calf View Post
Sweet - I'm going to be driving through the Marsden area in a couple of weeks. Actually hit a ditch there this time last year. Looks like I'll be doing some meteor hunting!!

Is the big Flames flag on the acerage on the west end of Lloyd on hwy 16 still kicking around?
Just make sure not to get any meteor shhh!t on you... I hear it really itches like something else.

And if you get a green rash, call a doctor:

Last edited by Nancy; 11-28-2008 at 10:51 PM.
Nancy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 12:53 PM   #107
Stranger
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Stranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

They found the meteor. It landed just south of Lloydminster near a small place called Lone Rock. I'll look for an article.
Stranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 01:04 PM   #108
ok, ok,....I get it
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: , location, location....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stranger View Post
They found the meteor. It landed just south of Lloydminster near a small place called Lone Rock. I'll look for an article.

punny
ok, ok,....I get it is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 05:00 PM   #109
stang
CP's Fraser Crane
 
stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ford Prefect View Post
Cool ... I'm a Battle River boy too, although from a ways upstream on the Alberta side. My brother still lives on the family farm and was outside when it happened. He said he could hear crackling and thought it might have landed just a few miles to the east. Sounds like it might have landed about 50 miles to the east though rather than just a few miles.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stranger View Post
They say it landed along the Battle River near Marsden, Saskatchewan. If that's true it only came within a couple of miles of our farm. I'll have to ask Dad if he's heard anything.

And I also live in Oilerville here in Lloydminster. One of the few Flames fans to be found around these parts.
Holy guys.. It was my Uncle and Aunty's farm they found it on... SPent lots of time out there as a kid.

Battle River Ranch... Used to work out there in the summers, helping with the cows and fencing...

I got some friends in Lone rock, and remember Swimming/partying at Buzzard Bridge as a teen.
stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 05:02 PM   #110
Ford Prefect
Has Towel, Will Travel
 
Ford Prefect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stang View Post
Holy guys.. It was my Uncle and Aunty's farm they found it on... SPent lots of time out there as a kid.

Battle River Ranch... Used to work out there in the summers, helping with the cows and fencing...

I got some friends in Lone rock, and remember Swimming/partying at Buzzard Bridge as a teen.
Cool ... I'm glad some Battle River farmers will cash in on this.
Ford Prefect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 07:39 PM   #111
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by photon View Post
Probably amount of light. The size from the images would be useless as it wasn't actually the size of the object that you saw on the videos, just the light being bright enough to wash out the sensor on the camera. The actual object was 1.5 - 2m across, no way you're going to see that any distance away let alone in Edmonton.

The amount of light probably gives an idea of how much material is burning, and they probably have a good idea of how much material would burn for all different sizes of incoming rocks. If you know the size, and the approximate density you can get the mass. Approximate density would be a WAG from the way it burned up and knowledge of general composition of past meteors... if it was an ice ball it would have looked different.

Speed, things fall at the same rate regardless of their mass in a vacuum, and the air resistance will depend on the shape as well as the mass so it's hard to say. Something that small isn't big enough to form itself into a sphere so who knows what shape it was originally.
Meteorite's don't all go the same speed, they enter the atmosphere anywhere between 30,000 and 60,000 MPH. depending on the angle they enter,their mass and makeup some slow a lot some very little as they break up.
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 10:46 PM   #112
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T View Post
Meteorite's don't all go the same speed, they enter the atmosphere anywhere between 30,000 and 60,000 MPH. depending on the angle they enter,their mass and makeup some slow a lot some very little as they break up.
I didn't say meteorites all go at the same speed, I said things fall at the same speed. Falling isn't the same as relative velocity of the earth and whatever the meteorite was before it hit the earth.

I said "things fall at the same speed" because Bagor asked if speed could be used to determine the object's mass; I didn't intend it as a comment about the meteor I intended it as a comment about physics, which is why I said "fall".

What happened to the object being "very big" BTW?
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:08 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy