01-03-2023, 09:02 PM
|
#101
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
|
I knew the Flames would lose when I heard the Jets had a bunch of rookies in their lineup. They have a tendency to feel they can take the night off when that happens
|
|
|
01-03-2023, 09:02 PM
|
#102
|
Franchise Player
|
I am really getting sick of the negativity around here - that was a great game, and a great road effort by the Flames. Could have gone either way. And what do we get? Half the posts are people whining about stuff that isn't even valid
|
|
|
The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
AC,
BigFlameDog,
Burning Beard,
Cali Panthers Fan,
CsInMyBlood,
davidus_49,
dino7c,
dissentowner,
ForeverFlameFan,
GioforPM,
jaikorven,
jayswin,
KootenayFlamesFan,
Major Major,
mile,
socalwingfan,
sonq,
Yamer
|
01-03-2023, 09:04 PM
|
#103
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yamer
Cherry pick whatever you want. You're just here to stir #### anyway.
|
He’s pretty much admitted as such
And his post about Kylington
It’s all a shtick
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-03-2023, 09:06 PM
|
#104
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flaming Homer
Im not going to blame this game on Markstrom. But its tough to deny that the team scores far less in front of him than they do playing in front of Vladar for whatever reason. And that includes two of our highest scoring games which actually were in front of Markstrom.
By my napkin math counting up GF and GA per game each goalie started:
Markstrom:
GF AVG: 2.88
GA AVG: 2.74
Vladar
GF AVG: 3.38
GA AVG: 2.76
|
could be as simple as Markstrom getting the tougher opposition
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-03-2023, 09:06 PM
|
#105
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
statistical evidence is only evidence with a large enough sample size
you have no case here
|
LOL it is you that has no case. The stats back up that Hellebyuck was the better goaltender tonight. Arguing against that is silly and futile. I will mention again that this loss isn’t because Markstrom was bad and more that the teams were fairly equal tonight and one goaltender was elite and the other just good.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-03-2023, 09:07 PM
|
#106
|
Commie Referee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoLevi
Saying your goalie is consistently the second best on the night whilst also underperforming their contract isn't quite the same as "blaming" them.
I'm not saying he's always bad, or was bad tonight. I'm saying he doesn't do his job to the level that his contract implies, relative to most (all?) other players in the league at his position.
|
You're really just making things up now.
|
|
|
01-03-2023, 09:07 PM
|
#107
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
I am really getting sick of the negativity around here - that was a great game, and a great road effort by the Flames. Could have gone either way. And what do we get? Half the posts are people whining about stuff that isn't even valid
|
Troll
|
|
|
01-03-2023, 09:08 PM
|
#108
|
Scoring Winger
|
Hard fought game. Hard to watch us play dump n chase all the time though
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getoverit For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-03-2023, 09:09 PM
|
#109
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Red Deer
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
LOL it is you that has no case. The stats back up that Hellebyuck was the better goaltender tonight. Arguing against that is silly and futile. I will mention again that this loss isn’t because Markstrom was bad and more that the teams were fairly equal tonight and one goaltender was elite and the other just good.
|
The stats only matter in a vacuum. Markstrom made a number of marvelous saves and IMO was the best Flame tonight.
They played to each other's level but one team got the breaks.
__________________
"It's a great day for hockey."
-'Badger' Bob Johnson (1931-1991)
"I see as much misery out of them moving to justify theirselves as them that set out to do harm."
-Dr. Amos "Doc" Cochran
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Yamer For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-03-2023, 09:09 PM
|
#110
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
I loved Backlund's game tonight. Again.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 1qqaaz For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-03-2023, 09:10 PM
|
#111
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
LOL it is you that has no case. The stats back up that Hellebyuck was the better goaltender tonight. Arguing against that is just dumb. I will mention again that this loss isn’t because Markstrom was bad and more that the teams were fairly equal tonight and one goaltender was elite and the other just good.
|
the stats only prove the case if the shots are equivalent
in a single game, they are not - and they weren't tonight
over larger sample sizes, that averages out. In a single game it does not.
arguing that he wasn't as good because the other guy made more saves is as naïve as it gets
|
|
|
01-03-2023, 09:10 PM
|
#112
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: ---
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
could be as simple as Markstrom getting the tougher opposition
|
I dont have the time to cross reference each teams win% they started again but by the quick eyeball test looks fairly even to me.
|
|
|
01-03-2023, 09:10 PM
|
#113
|
Commie Referee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
I am really getting sick of the negativity around here - that was a great game, and a great road effort by the Flames. Could have gone either way. And what do we get? Half the posts are people whining about stuff that isn't even valid
|
The Jets broadcast on TSN gave quite a bit of praise to the Flames and the game itself, mentioned many times how much of a playoff type game it was. Really could've gone either way.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to KootenayFlamesFan For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-03-2023, 09:10 PM
|
#114
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
the stats only prove the case if the shots are equivalent
in a single game, they are not - and they weren't tonight
over larger sample sizes, that averages out. In a single game it does not.
arguing that he wasn't as good because the other guy made more saves is as naïve as it gets
|
You are being purposely obtuse here.
|
|
|
01-03-2023, 09:11 PM
|
#115
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Jets had more high danger despite being outshot
|
|
|
01-03-2023, 09:11 PM
|
#116
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
LOL it is you that has no case. The stats back up that Hellebyuck was the better goaltender tonight. Arguing against that is silly and futile. I will mention again that this loss isn’t because Markstrom was bad and more that the teams were fairly equal tonight and one goaltender was elite and the other just good.
|
This is it exactly.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-03-2023, 09:13 PM
|
#118
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Jets had more high danger despite being outshot
|
Not according to moneypuck.
https://moneypuck.com/g.htm?id=2022020603
|
|
|
01-03-2023, 09:13 PM
|
#119
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
You are being purposely obtuse here.
|
LOL
I am not discussing it any further, statistics are not valid until the sample size is significant enough to make them so
If you want so say you didn't like Markstrom's game, go ahead. But using the shot stats to support your position has zero validity
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-03-2023, 09:18 PM
|
#120
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
|
Do they expect Huberdeau to carry Lucic for the rest of the year?
What a waste
The line has been useless for awhile now
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:42 AM.
|
|