04-25-2016, 09:15 AM
|
#101
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
Very real possibility we finish 9th as well.
|
That is a strong possibility, sir.
|
|
|
04-25-2016, 09:19 AM
|
#102
|
Franchise Player
|
man, have they ever made a mess of the lottery. Just put it back to how it was
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
04-25-2016, 09:22 AM
|
#103
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
I think we all know who the expert is when it comes to the "very real possibility" of the Flames picking 9th. For once, its not FDW...
|
|
|
04-25-2016, 09:48 AM
|
#104
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
The best case scenario (i.e. where the Flames get the highest possible 1st from the Stars) left in the playoffs for the Flames with respect to draft picks: - Ducks eliminated before Western Conference final.
- Caps eliminated in the Eastern Conference final.
- Stars eliminated in the Western Conference final and Russell's game played condition is met.
- Arizona signs Connor Bleackley.
Stars pick becomes 26th OA and Panthers pick becomes 55th OA.
|
Wouldn't the Stars pick 27th OA in the best case? The four conference finalists picking 27, 28, 29 and 30?
|
|
|
04-25-2016, 09:55 AM
|
#105
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arsenal14
Wouldn't the Stars pick 27th OA in the best case? The four conference finalists picking 27, 28, 29 and 30?
|
you are right typo.
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 10:45 PM
|
#106
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Panthers pick can now be 53, 54, or 55 with the Ducks eliminated.
53 if both Washington and Dallas are eliminated in the 2nd round
54 if one of Washington or Dallas is eliminated in the 2nd round
55 if both Washington and Dallas advance to the conference finals
If Arizona gets a compensatory pick for Bleackley, it will be 54, 55 or 56.
Last edited by sureLoss; 04-27-2016 at 10:47 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-27-2016, 10:52 PM
|
#107
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
|
The game ended 5 minutes ago. You're a god damn ninja.
|
|
|
04-27-2016, 11:32 PM
|
#108
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
|
The game ended 5 minutes ago. You're a god damn ninja.
edit: well a 40 minute DP is odd, but ya...that.
Last edited by Frequitude; 04-27-2016 at 11:36 PM.
|
|
|
04-28-2016, 07:23 AM
|
#109
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Panthers pick can now be 53, 54, or 55 with the Ducks eliminated.
53 if both Washington and Dallas are eliminated in the 2nd round
54 if one of Washington or Dallas is eliminated in the 2nd round
55 if both Washington and Dallas advance to the conference finals
If Arizona gets a compensatory pick for Bleackley, it will be 54, 55 or 56.
|
I haven't had enough coffee yet, but can someone explains how this works? I would have thought that Washington and Dallas winning more would push them down the draft order (i.e. to bigger numbers) and therefore push Florida up (to a smaller number). It seems backwards to me, but I assume I'm missing something.
|
|
|
04-28-2016, 07:53 AM
|
#110
|
Franchise Player
|
Conference finalists get the last 4 picks.
|
|
|
04-28-2016, 08:03 AM
|
#111
|
Franchise Player
|
The NHL doesn't do a good job explaining but
30th - Stanley Cup Winner
29th - Stanley Cup Finalist
28th/27th - Conference finalists
Remaining division leaders (if any) (reverse standings)
non-division leaders (reverse standings)
14th-4th non-playoff team, non-lottery winning teams (reverse standings)
3rd-1st - lottery winning teams
So for the Panthers pick the best case scenario now is:
30th - Non-Division winner Stanley Cup winner
29th - Non-Division winner Stanley Cup loser
28th - Non-Division winner Conference finalist
27th - Non-Division winner Conference finalist
26th - Washington
25th - Dallas
24th - Ducks
23rd - Panthers
For the Flames, we're hoping Dallas makes it to the conference finals though.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Oling_Roachinen For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-28-2016, 08:28 AM
|
#112
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
The NHL doesn't do a good job explaining but
30th - Stanley Cup Winner
29th - Stanley Cup Finalist
28th/27th - Conference finalists
Remaining division leaders (if any) (reverse standings)
non-division leaders (reverse standings)
14th-4th non-playoff team, non-lottery winning teams (reverse standings)
3rd-1st - lottery winning teams
So for the Panthers pick the best case scenario now is:
30th - Non-Division winner Stanley Cup winner
29th - Non-Division winner Stanley Cup loser
28th - Non-Division winner Conference finalist
27th - Non-Division winner Conference finalist
26th - Washington
25th - Dallas
24th - Ducks
23rd - Panthers
For the Flames, we're hoping Dallas makes it to the conference finals though.
|
Thanks, great explanation
|
|
|
04-28-2016, 02:15 PM
|
#113
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
I simply detest that there is even a discussion about tanking in pro sports. A system needs to be in place where each and every game the entire org (managers + players) try to win 100% of the time.
What system should that be? My opinion is unpopular, but simple. Each team that misses the dance gets 1 lottery ball. Picks 1-14 are all lottery picks. No one has any incentive to do anything except try their hardest to win.
Oh, but what about strong teams getting really good prospects? In the cap era, teams will be forced to trade top prospects once they realize they can't afford them down the line. In the grand scheme of things, it will all even out.
|
Except, a three year ELC contract stops the cap from doing it's job efficiently.
Be much better to get rid of the draft completely and let teams offer contracts to the players directly without any preset ELCs. Then the salary cap would keep things fair. If Toronto wants to offer Mathews a 9 million dollar contract then great, go for it.
|
|
|
04-29-2016, 01:27 PM
|
#114
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
|
Kind of nervous for tomorrow's lottery hopefully it works out well for us.
|
|
|
04-29-2016, 01:30 PM
|
#115
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Getting a Finn is the best possible outcome but there's a lot of meat on the bone regardless where the Flames end up. And this years draft kind of leaves you with the feeling that 8 teams are going to have the biggest variances in their lists. You might end up getting someone who sitting at 4 all the way down in 8th.
Only thing I am looking forward to is having the mystery removed as to where the Flames pick.
|
|
|
04-29-2016, 01:50 PM
|
#116
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Getting a Finn is the best possible outcome but there's a lot of meat on the bone regardless where the Flames end up. And this years draft kind of leaves you with the feeling that 8 teams are going to have the biggest variances in their lists. You might end up getting someone who sitting at 4 all the way down in 8th.
Only thing I am looking forward to is having the mystery removed as to where the Flames pick.
|
Even if we dropped down to 7th I wouldn't be surprised if a few teams "reach" for a defenseman. Could still get Dubois or Tkachuk at #7.
I personally have a bad feeling about Nylander. Small skilled forward with a famous name.
|
|
|
04-29-2016, 01:57 PM
|
#117
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
Very real possibility we finish 9th as well.
|
Reverse of that statement is "very real possibility we finish 1st".
Both are unlikely.
|
|
|
04-29-2016, 02:02 PM
|
#118
|
Draft Pick
|
...
Last edited by breakaway; 04-29-2016 at 02:28 PM.
Reason: nevermind
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to breakaway For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-29-2016, 02:13 PM
|
#119
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by breakaway
I think your explanation was good, but for non-playoff teams that don't get the top 3 picks, it's not just reverse standings, it's based on odds.
|
What? No, it's just reverse standings for the 4-14 picks.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
04-29-2016, 08:30 PM
|
#120
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
|
So if Russell plays in game 2, the 50% games played in the first two rounds of the playoffs condition will be met?
Last edited by Yoho; 04-29-2016 at 08:35 PM.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:28 PM.
|
|