Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
Or they can say then I guess I wait a year and become a UFA... I can go the Ian White arbitration route and get a 1 year 3M contract that makes me a UFA next year this time.
They Flames would argue that the made a huge mistake paying Raymond 3M x 3.
If Bouma is a UFA and people think that Raymond's contract is the going rate then Bouma would be getting at least 5M , maybe 6 as a UFA this year.
so look at as 2M for his RFA year, 5M for two years of UFA 3 years @ 12M
Overpaying for Raymond as a UFA just plays havoc with your internal salary structure.
At least Wideman @5.2 and Hudler at 4 had a reasonable expectation of being a #1/2 D-man top 3 forward.... which they have done.
Bouma should get a 3-4 year deal at somewhere around 3M.....based on Gio and Brodie Not Jones and Raymond.
Bouma is the reason teh Flames were able to move Glencross.
|
No, no, no.
First, you don't base a contract for a Bouma after one good year on Gio's.
Second, you don't give a UFA with 16 goals once in his career $5M. Based on anyone.
Third, Glencross' UFA status, age and demands were why they moved Glencross. Not because of Bouma.
Fourth, Raymond's contract was not a mistake. He's on a 20 goal pace, same as most of his recent career, which gets you $3M as a UFA. Yeah, he's streaky, but so are lots of scorers (like Glencross, who will get more).
Bouma would not get $3M in arbitration, because arbitrators don't look at just one year's production.