Quote:
Originally Posted by alltherage
Damn work comp with no speakers. If anyone wants to transcribe the McIvor hot seat that would be pretty cool! 
|
Sorry if this makes no sense. I tried to type this on on one listen.
The statments are from Mike, the bullet points are from Ric.
Headlights in rear view. What's wrong?
- They had him behind before. He's been going ahead
About an insurmountable lead a while ago. What's going on?
- He's been pretty steady. Being ahead in the polls, therefore has become the target.
[Ric is] the experience. In 9 years, he's been on council, but Tax goes up 40%. Has been branded as part of a "raiding party"
- He didn't get "Dr No" for a reason. Implies that he slowed down the taxing
- Understands the taxes were inappropriate
His arguments to reduce taxes didn't help.
- Claims they're incorrect and have selective memory
- He and a few others managed to it slow down.
- He fought to reduce the taxes and says that, if mayor, he'll avoid unneeded tax increases
Eau Claire. Claims that McIver passed the buck
- Says that he, if mayor, insists that all information was needed. Says council, as a group, needs the information.