Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by alltherage  Damn work comp with no speakers. If anyone wants to transcribe the McIvor hot seat that would be pretty cool!   | 
	
 
Sorry if this makes no sense.  I tried to type this on on one listen.
The statments are from Mike, the bullet points are from Ric.
Headlights in rear view.  What's wrong?
 - They had him behind before.  He's been going ahead
About an insurmountable lead a while ago.  What's going on?
 - He's been pretty steady.  Being ahead in the polls, therefore has become the target. 
[Ric is] the experience.  In 9 years, he's been on council, but Tax goes up 40%.  Has been branded as part of a "raiding party"
 - He didn't get "Dr No" for a reason.  Implies that he slowed down the taxing
 - Understands the taxes were inappropriate
His arguments to reduce taxes didn't help.  
 - Claims they're incorrect and have selective memory
 - He and a few others managed to it slow down.  
 - He fought to reduce the taxes and says that, if mayor, he'll avoid unneeded tax increases
Eau Claire.  Claims that McIver passed the buck
 - Says that he, if mayor, insists that all information was needed.  Says council, as a group, needs the information.