04-17-2019, 09:56 PM
|
#1061
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by timbit
Well you would have won 93000 dollars on a 100 dollar bet on BJs sweeping the Bolts.
Does that answer your question?
|
This is incorrect in so many levels!
It was 18-1 for a sweep on the site I saw
|
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:57 PM
|
#1062
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: San Francisco
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benched
honestly our D being active and pinching IMO is the biggest difference of the game. we look much better when we play that way.
too scared to get burnt last game, backed off instead of playing our game.
|
Exactly, the flames are good when the D are aggressive. There’s still a couple playing hesitant out there tho
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:57 PM
|
#1063
|
|
Not a casual user
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
|
The pressure of the game seemed to get to the Flames near the end of the period. They started to panic with the puck and made some dumb plays. Hopefully they can settle down in the third.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:57 PM
|
#1064
|
|
damn onions
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by timbit
Well you would have won 93000 dollars on a 100 dollar bet on BJs sweeping the Bolts.
Does that answer your question?
|
Were those seriously the odds?! Or are you exaggerating? I was trying to find that earlier but gave up.
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:57 PM
|
#1065
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: DeWinton
|
What do the Flames need to do to win the 3rd? Trap? Scoring the next goal would be nice.
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:57 PM
|
#1066
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Flames need to ice the puck if need be...so many of the chances are self inflicted
|
Good point. Better to ice it take a 10 second breath. Even if they loose the face off they can reset.
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:57 PM
|
#1067
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Flames need to ice the puck if need be...so many of the chances are self inflicted
|
This. So much this. Especially when you're 60% in the dot. These small dumps to centre that let the Avalanche wind up again do nothing. As previously mentioned, you're better letting them cycle where they're less effective. Instead they keep giving them the puck in the neutral zone with 5 tired guys. Just ice the puck!
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:58 PM
|
#1068
|
|
Commie Referee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
|
Yes.......this can't continue.
Quote:
Ryan Pike@RyanNPike
High-danger chances are 13-4 Avalanche through 40. Mike Smith doing a heck of a job for #Flames
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:58 PM
|
#1069
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
I'm at Craft and can't really hear the game - but from what I see this appears like a very even tilt. Smith looks great, team structure looks better and compete level is where it should have been last game.
Colorado competes hard but we are right in this.
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:58 PM
|
#1070
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CedarMeter
What do the Flames need to do to win the 3rd? Trap? Scoring the next goal would be nice.
|
Oh I dont know. Play the 3rd like they always do? I mean...they're kind of at their best in the last period...the best period.
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:58 PM
|
#1071
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee
Were those seriously the odds?! Or are you exaggerating? I was trying to find that earlier but gave up.
|
No, that was a theoretical parlay bet on Columbus sweeping Tampa and the Islanders sweeping the Pens.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to stazzy33 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:58 PM
|
#1072
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion
Trying to make that extra play as opposed to shooting  |
agreed...
i think they'd be better off shooting and hoping for a rebound...
its going to be a greasy goal; not painting a Rembrandt against this team...
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:58 PM
|
#1073
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Classic_Sniper
- Refs suck: Missed so many penalties for the Flames
- Having TJ Brodie defend for your team is a frightening: His hockey IQ is non existent at times
- Mike Smith is a monster: Saving our bacon again
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
Rodie has been the most consistent and effective defenseman against MacKinnon on the rush tonight
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DropIt For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:58 PM
|
#1074
|
|
Franchise Player
|
First foray into the GT and the usual culprits complaining about the officiating.
They are letting them play and it’s pretty obviously going both ways IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Strange Brew For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:58 PM
|
#1075
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stazzy33
The only way the avs player can get away with pushing that stick out to centre is if it is broken. You can get a broken stick out of the way, it happens all the time during a powerplay. It's if that stick wasn't broken that it would be a penalty. Either way should have been a powerplay for Calgary, whether the stick was broken when it was slashed out of Hathaway's hands, or if it wasn't broken and fired out to centre.
|
Hathaway went and got it though I think...
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:58 PM
|
#1076
|
|
Not a casual user
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
|
Who would have imagined Smith playing like this when we watched him flounder early in the season. Most of us thought he was done.
Glad he decided to elevate his game in these playoffs.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:58 PM
|
#1077
|
|
Commie Referee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee
Were those seriously the odds?! Or are you exaggerating? I was trying to find that earlier but gave up.
|
I think that was for a parlay of the Isles and Jackets both sweeping.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to KootenayFlamesFan For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:58 PM
|
#1078
|
|
Franchise Player
|
The odds were 93000 off of 100 for calling both the Colombus and Islander sweeps
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Harry Lime For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:59 PM
|
#1079
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Our season pretty well rests on this period. Be the Flames that got you here.
__________________
Trust the snake.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-17-2019, 09:59 PM
|
#1080
|
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ottawa ON
|
They better step it up in the 3rd and not sit on this lead ....
I hate when teams just try to defend leads ....
Be the 3rd Period team we have seen all season and this one is done.
Be the 3rd Period team we have seen all playoffs and this one is done.
Regular season team hustle is all i ask for
__________________
"I'll have to photocopy that for my kids. One day, I'll be trying to talk hockey and they'll be saying, 'The game has passed you by, dad.' I'll be able to say, 'Ovechkin's on it, and he's still lighting it up.' " - Jarome Iginla
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Mitt31 For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:08 PM.
|
|
