Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-20-2014, 05:08 PM   #81
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

A player can never receive less than 85% of his previous year's salary. But in Colborne's case that would put him below the league minimum.

As far as I can deduce the Flames could say he's worth league minimum ($550,000) with a fairly clear conscience, but I imagine they'll start with last year's salary & go from there.

From what Colborne's camp has been saying I imagine they'll try and settle this outside of the arbitration process.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2014, 06:30 PM   #82
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chubeyr1 View Post
Ahhhhh let the bum walk!!!!

I am kidding. However if they use Engellands contract in an arbitration hearing we might just have to let him walk lol!

Still not a bad rookie year from the kid but......He is in tough to make this team. We have 5 guys or more in the minors that could put up his point totals easily this year.

Yet big = Good, right? I hate Colbornes first step ( so slow ), hate he is a big man and doesn't use his body. Yet it was his rookie year. He got better as the year progressed. To be Honest Monahan was driving me nuts too. Wanted to see these guys get physical and fight for the puck. Later in the year they did that. How much did having Westgarth help them? Seriously, these young guys played soft like butter till that trade.

Regardless, lots of protection out there now. Not ready to give up on Colborne. 1 more year, with confidence and protection. Slow first step definitely, but shootouts he proved the kid definitely has some great hands.

Hope he is a late bloomer. Flames are handling him the right way too. Every chance to succeed he will get. Its up to him now!
They cannot use UFA contracts as comparables.

He is a lock to make this team, don't kid yourself.

He might have a slow first step he he actually skates quite well overall, he also uses his body to protect the puck very effectively, he just isn't overly physical

Last edited by Alberta_Beef; 07-20-2014 at 06:32 PM.
Alberta_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2014, 06:51 PM   #83
AcGold
Self-Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Tough to be physical when he was incredibly skinny. 6'5 210 is a lower BMI (24.9) than the average NHL player. If he can get up to 235 he'll be able to throw some hits around.
AcGold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2014, 07:25 PM   #84
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AcGold View Post
Tough to be physical when he was incredibly skinny. 6'5 210 is a lower BMI (24.9) than the average NHL player. If he can get up to 235 he'll be able to throw some hits around.
Quote:
The 6-foot-5 Colborne proudly reports he's now up to 220 lb., extra weight that comes in the form of muscle and not inches around his waistline.
http://www.calgarysun.com/2014/07/16...aring-on-aug-1
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2014, 08:09 PM   #85
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
@FriedgeHNIC: In arbitration, player and team must submit figure 48 hrs before hearing. First to go is Cody Franson (TOR)...

@FriedgeHNIC: Franson has submitted $4.2M. TOR has submitted $2M. They can still settle beforehand.
Is there anything more stupid in the CBA than this so-called arbitrtiation, players allways reach for the moon knowing they won't get that much and the team always low-ball their player and have to tell them their not as good as they think thus straining a relationship.

And of course 99% of the time the number is close to the middle. In other words my kid could be an arbitrtiator!

Show some balls like baseball, it's one or the other.
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2014, 08:18 PM   #86
AcGold
Self-Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
15 to go and he'll be laying out some big hits.
AcGold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 07:34 AM   #87
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

steve simmons @simmonssteve
BREAKING: Leafs avoid arbitration with Cody Franson. One year deal: 3.3 million.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 07:43 AM   #88
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
Kreider (NYR) requests $2.8M. Rangers have offered a two-year deal at $1.9, then $2.2.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 07:50 AM   #89
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

I wonder if this means the leafs are going to shop Franson or another defender. I would love if the rangers were forced to trade Kreider but I can't see them not signing him.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 07:55 AM   #90
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Ken Campbell @THNKenCampbell
Ryan O'Reilly asking for $6.75 million in arbitration. Avs offering $5.525 million. O'Reilly elects one-year deal.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 08:01 AM   #91
StrykerSteve
Ass Handler
 
StrykerSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okotoks, AB
Exp:
Default 2014 Salary Arbitration - Joe Colborne files for Arbitration

It gives me a strange satisfaction to know that Calgary is responsible for those crazy high numbers in O'Reilly's case.

I wish more GMs would go after RFAs.
StrykerSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 08:02 AM   #92
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

until it happens to us.....
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-21-2014, 08:08 AM   #93
Read Only
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrykerSteve View Post
It gives me a strange satisfaction to know that Calgary is responsible for those crazy high numbers in O'Reilly's case.

I wish more GMs would go after RFAs.
Why?

It did nothing to help the Flames at all and only made ROR an overpaid guy. Not sure we need more overpaid players in the league.

I can't understand why GM's go after RFA's at all as it is a pretty useless move that rarely, if ever, works.
Read Only is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 08:10 AM   #94
StrykerSteve
Ass Handler
 
StrykerSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okotoks, AB
Exp:
Default 2014 Salary Arbitration - Joe Colborne files for Arbitration

Because it handcuffed the Avs financially and they probably lost Stastny because of it. They'll also lose O'Reilly in a year.
StrykerSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 08:18 AM   #95
Read Only
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrykerSteve View Post
Because it handcuffed the Avs financially and they probably lost Stastny because of it. They'll also lose O'Reilly in a year.
I think Stastny was likely leaving anyways and isn't nearly as big a loss as many are making him out to be and I am not sure how that helped Calgary in any way.

Are we making the play-offs this year because of that? Are we adding players now that we couldn't have got prior to the offer sheet?

And that is only because the offer sheet was macthed and ignores how bad it would have been if the Avs let us get ROR and the Flames are now stuck with an overpriced 2nd line maybe center, no play-offs and no better off in the long term either.

That offer sheet seemed to have 0 benefits for the Flames and only downside if we would hvae got ROR or the NHL enforced its rules and we lost the picks and player.
Read Only is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 08:20 AM   #96
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

And when we're put in the same position because someone wants to offer one of our guys a lot more than he's worth, we'll be out too.

I don't think the Flames are in a position to sign other team's RFA's for a while because if we give up any of our draft picks for the next few years, it'll set us back a few years.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 08:46 AM   #97
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Arbitrator has awarded a 1 year $2.75 mil deal to Sobotka. He will still play in the KHL next season.
http://blues.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=726719

If he returns to the NHL, Sobotka must play out the contract that was awarded.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 10:44 AM   #98
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Arbitrator has awarded a 1 year $2.75 mil deal to Sobotka. He will still play in the KHL next season.
http://blues.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=726719
That's the same number Sobotka's agent had said the Blues offered him prior to leaving. I know Sobotka's camp was looking for a 3M+ contract before signing in the KHL so I wonder how involved Sobotka's agent was with the arbitration or if the plan is just to stick in the KHL for the rest of his career.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
If he returns to the NHL, Sobotka must play out the contract that was awarded.
How one-sided is this? I imagine Sobotka couldn't return in two decades and expect a 2.75M contract from the Blues but what's the actual ruling, anyone know?
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 10:50 AM   #99
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AcGold View Post
Tough to be physical when he was incredibly skinny. 6'5 210 is a lower BMI (24.9) than the average NHL player. If he can get up to 235 he'll be able to throw some hits around.
size is only part of the equation to being that type of player. There are so many players with good size but just don't play much of a bruising game. Regardless of how much bigger colborne gets, i don't see a bruiser style of play from him, and think that's ok. he reminds me of a JVR type player who has great size, good puck skills, great hands in-close, but not all that physical. Trying to think of other big forwards that have excelled with the same size/skill and limited physicality... maybe thornton-lite (ie. thornton without the elite vision and passing ability).

Colborne growth as a player last year, had less to do with the move to the wing, more to do with understanding how to use his size and reach to his advantage along the boards and as he cut to the middle of the ice with the puck, as well as in front of the net. Getting bigger will only help him become effective in this realm.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 10:54 AM   #100
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Ken Campbell @THNKenCampbell
Ryan O'Reilly asking for $6.75 million in arbitration. Avs offering $5.525 million. O'Reilly elects one-year deal.
For a one-year contract, that is not a massive difference.

I think the Avs offer is fair enough.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy