Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-30-2014, 06:47 PM   #81
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
Well, the league will make that money back through a relocation fee. Especially if, say Bell and Rogers decide they can't play nice together as Maple Leafs owners and one company gives up their stake in exchange for a free relocation into the Toronto market for the other.

If the Coyotes can't figure out how to draw fans in the next couple seasons, it is Glendale that will be left holding the bag. Everyone else breaks even or turns a profit.
Well I brought up the Bell and Rogers scenario in the other thread but as you say, if that happens the relocation fee is waived, so how does the NHL get their money back? I think people are confused with a relocation fee and territorial rights which the league in Toronto's case, contends doesn't exist. An amicable split between Rogers and Bell would avoid a court case over territorial rights but that there would be a relocation fee as well for the new team, as you say probably not.

They may be able to get a relocation fee to make the Seattle or Quebec C. move but I don't think these owners have bottomless pockets and will have to start paying the principal in 5 years. They are already heavily leveraged.

Personally, with the recent re-alignment and the need of staying in the US for TV, I don't see Gary giving Quebec City the Coyotes franchise or even an expansion franchise. Their best option is moving a Eastern conference team.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 06:54 PM   #82
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Wow, so basically what this boils down to is; The league will keep taking losses in it's lame duck location, and around the same time they reach $50 mil in losses a group and arena in another desired location should be ready, then they get that $50 back and then some, in the form of relocation fee?
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 06:58 PM   #83
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

The league no longer owns the Coyotes, so it isn't losing anything. It is owed a debt by RSE, but otherwise won't accrue any further losses. Its RSE that is on tab to eat that $50 million+ if the market doesn't turn around.

And I doubt the relocation fee gets waived in that scenario, Vulcan. The league will make sure it gets its money back. Its the indemnity for moving into the Leafs territory that would be waived as part of a transfer of ownership shares.

Last edited by Resolute 14; 01-30-2014 at 07:01 PM.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-30-2014, 07:00 PM   #84
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flameswin View Post
Wow, so basically what this boils down to is; The league will keep taking losses in it's lame duck location, and around the same time they reach $50 mil in losses a group and arena in another desired location should be ready, then they get that $50 back and then some, in the form of relocation fee?
No it's the owners who have to eat the $50M in losses and than they will need to pay a re-location fee, so the NHL can recoup their $104M in losses.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 07:14 PM   #85
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
The league no longer owns the Coyotes, so it isn't losing anything. It is owed a debt by RSE, but otherwise won't accrue any further losses. Its RSE that is on tab to eat that $50 million+ if the market doesn't turn around.

And I doubt the relocation fee gets waived in that scenario, Vulcan. The league will make sure it gets its money back. Its the indemnity for moving into the Leafs territory that would be waived as part of a transfer of ownership shares.
That's what I said, the Leafs territorial fee would be waived. You said it was the relocation fee.

I can see the relocation fee being waived as well as a they are already giving up 50% of the Leafs and you want them to pay a relocation fee too?

and yeah, the NHL won't have any further loses but they are already in the hole for $104M.

Last edited by Vulcan; 01-30-2014 at 07:16 PM.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 10:45 PM   #86
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Trust me, the NHL will get that money back. Primarily because they won't just let RSE sell and make a large profit. Bettman will, at worst, take enough out of their hide to ensure the league breaks even. But selling into a market like that would leave enough left over for RSE to come out even as well.

It gets dicier if they end up looking at more questionable markets like Quebec City or Seattle. In that case, I still expect the league comes out even, but RSE faces higher risk.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 12:21 AM   #87
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

RSE is in for $250M for the Coyotes with the high interest principal payments starting in 5 years.. Even if they get charged the $104M and are in a position to pay the relocation fees, making the NHL break even, the NHL didn't need to stay in Phoenix losing the $146M in the first place. They could have been moved after the bankruptcy and pocketed the relocation fee.

So in a nutshell, maybe the NHL can break even but they could have pocketed the relocation fee.

On a side note, it would be hilarious if the new Toronto team is owned by Calgary oil men.

Last edited by Vulcan; 01-31-2014 at 12:24 AM.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 12:24 AM   #88
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Wasn't the name change sfter this season announced at the time of the sale?
Alberta_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy