Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
Well, the league will make that money back through a relocation fee. Especially if, say Bell and Rogers decide they can't play nice together as Maple Leafs owners and one company gives up their stake in exchange for a free relocation into the Toronto market for the other.
If the Coyotes can't figure out how to draw fans in the next couple seasons, it is Glendale that will be left holding the bag. Everyone else breaks even or turns a profit.
|
Well I brought up the Bell and Rogers scenario in the other thread but as you say, if that happens the relocation fee is waived, so how does the NHL get their money back? I think people are confused with a relocation fee and territorial rights which the league in Toronto's case, contends doesn't exist. An amicable split between Rogers and Bell would avoid a court case over territorial rights but that there would be a relocation fee as well for the new team, as you say probably not.
They may be able to get a relocation fee to make the Seattle or Quebec C. move but I don't think these owners have bottomless pockets and will have to start paying the principal in 5 years. They are already heavily leveraged.
Personally, with the recent re-alignment and the need of staying in the US for TV, I don't see Gary giving Quebec City the Coyotes franchise or even an expansion franchise. Their best option is moving a Eastern conference team.