Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-13-2023, 05:42 PM   #9061
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samonadreau View Post
With Taveres off the books leafs would be all in on Mcdavid.
That list with Tavares on it is for the Draisaitl year. When McDavid is up, the Leafs only have Matthews, Kampf, and Rielly under contract.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2023, 06:18 PM   #9062
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
That list with Tavares on it is for the Draisaitl year. When McDavid is up, the Leafs only have Matthews, Kampf, and Rielly under contract.
Gotcha. Point still stands
Samonadreau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2023, 11:32 PM   #9063
Macindoc
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
Leafs could trade Matthew's for a huge return and sign McDavid 🤔
McDavid on the Leafs might actually be more intolerable than McDavid on the Oilers. With the Crossover King at the centre of the universe, alll Canadian sports media would be in a massive Leafs circle jerk. And imagine if the Leafs actually won the Cup with him, there would be no escaping it anywhere in Canada.
Macindoc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2023, 11:36 PM   #9064
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macindoc View Post
McDavid on the Leafs might actually be more intolerable than McDavid on the Oilers. With the Crossover King at the centre of the universe, alll Canadian sports media would be in a massive Leafs circle jerk. And imagine if the Leafs actually won the Cup with him, there would be no escaping it anywhere in Canada.
Nope. Oilers are the worst.
Samonadreau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2023, 11:36 PM   #9065
Torture
Loves Teh Chat!
 
Torture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macindoc View Post
McDavid on the Leafs might actually be more intolerable than McDavid on the Oilers. With the Crossover King at the centre of the universe, alll Canadian sports media would be in a massive Leafs circle jerk. And imagine if the Leafs actually won the Cup with him, there would be no escaping it anywhere in Canada.
Sure, but just think of the Edmonton tears.
Torture is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Torture For This Useful Post:
Old 10-14-2023, 12:14 AM   #9066
midniteowl
Franchise Player
 
midniteowl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macindoc View Post
McDavid on the Leafs might actually be more intolerable than McDavid on the Oilers. With the Crossover King at the centre of the universe, alll Canadian sports media would be in a massive Leafs circle jerk. And imagine if the Leafs actually won the Cup with him, there would be no escaping it anywhere in Canada.
McDavid will still me "look at me" McDavid and won't play a team game. So, Leafs will not win the Cup with him.
midniteowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2023, 05:32 AM   #9067
Nelson
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Exp:
Default

Lebrun: “The positive is that the dialogue continues, and I don’t sense any lines being drawn in the sand. But the negative obviously is that going back to the Flames’ contract offer being made a week after the June draft and the Lindholm camp sharing its counter position, there really hasn’t been much movement as far as I can tell.”

From https://flamesnation.ca/news/betway-...nhl-october-13. Thanks Ryan Pike.

I share this because Lebrun consistently seems very well informed about the Flames.
Nelson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Nelson For This Useful Post:
Old 10-14-2023, 08:12 AM   #9068
Nelson
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Exp:
Default

So, I believe Steinberg has said the Flames made an offer between 8.5-9 per year. I’ve also seen one of our three “local” insiders say the first offer was 8.2 per year. Have Friedman, Seravalli or Lebrun ever put out a specific number? My understanding is that we don’t know exactly what the Flames’ offer was, but I’ve never seen any rumours of anything less than 8.2. Is that fair?

Edit: apparently, Lebrun also said this on Insider Trading: “The reality is, from what we understand they’re still just not close yet on a number… I think the Flames look at the recent extension signed by Scheifele as perhaps something that could be looked at in the talks here with (Elias) Lindholm”

Edit edit: Friedman said this on 32 thoughts on Oct 4: But I don’t get the sense anything is close, yet. And it’s possible Elias Lindholm’s number is going to be higher than I initially thought — in the $9-million range.

It seems likely that the Flames are in the low to mid 8s, and Lindholm is at 9+.

I also remember seeing rumours that clauses, how much if the salary is paid via bonuses were issues.

Last edited by Nelson; 10-14-2023 at 08:28 AM.
Nelson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2023, 08:31 AM   #9069
442scotty
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

I think this road trip will go a long ways to deciding what Lindholm is worth
442scotty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2023, 09:48 AM   #9070
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 442scotty View Post
I think this road trip will go a long ways to deciding what Lindholm is worth

I don't think any road trip is going to show his worth. Unless he truly puts up an exceptional season of 100+ points, his worth as a 28 year old two-way player has been determined. Realistically nobody can expect him to be the next Bergeron. The jury is out but it's likely he's peaked. Him expecting top dollar and top term is ridiculous. Give him 4 years at $9.5 and be done with it or deal him. It's pretty simple at this point.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bluejays For This Useful Post:
Old 10-14-2023, 09:59 AM   #9071
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

744 career NHL games, over half with Calgary. How he plays the next 10 games should have very little bearing on his future salary. I really hope the Flames remain from in these negotiations.
Strange Brew is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2023, 10:23 AM   #9072
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays View Post
I don't think any road trip is going to show his worth. Unless he truly puts up an exceptional season of 100+ points, his worth as a 28 year old two-way player has been determined. Realistically nobody can expect him to be the next Bergeron. The jury is out but it's likely he's peaked. Him expecting top dollar and top term is ridiculous. Give him 4 years at $9.5 and be done with it or deal him. It's pretty simple at this point.
Not that simple.

Zero chance he accepts 4 years when his next contract at that age would take a nose dive.

Plus “ dealing him now” when few teams with any interest in him would not have the available cap space would simply result in a terrible deal for the Flames. The chouces now are to sign him or wait until the trade deadline when possibilities should open up.

Last edited by The Cobra; 10-14-2023 at 10:43 AM.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2023, 10:36 AM   #9073
iggyloob12
Scoring Winger
 
iggyloob12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Albert
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays View Post
Give him 4 years at $9.5 and be done with it or deal him. It's pretty simple at this point.
That's not a serious offer.
iggyloob12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2023, 10:47 AM   #9074
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays View Post
I don't think any road trip is going to show his worth. Unless he truly puts up an exceptional season of 100+ points, his worth as a 28 year old two-way player has been determined. Realistically nobody can expect him to be the next Bergeron. The jury is out but it's likely he's peaked. Him expecting top dollar and top term is ridiculous. Give him 4 years at $9.5 and be done with it or deal him. It's pretty simple at this point.
The team knows what it has in Lindholm. That said, it is another data point. A valuable one. The team doesn't know if Huberdeau and Lindholm can be a duo 5 on 5. We don't know how much of an outlier last year was. A miserable team + a different role on the PP + first kid. We don't know if Lindholm made Toffoli have a career year, or if it was all Toffoli.

Lindholm himself said that he thinks he can be a lot better. The 1st game of the year showed me a level of compete I haven't seen from Lindholm in a while. He was definitely a top player that game, and he stood out like a top player.

Finally, if you think the team has all the data already, and they have a lot more data than we do, then their assessment of Lindholm's value is much better than ours.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2023, 10:50 AM   #9075
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

5 X $9.5
6 X $9
7 X $8.5
8 X $8

You choose, Elias
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2023, 11:06 AM   #9076
Redrum
First Line Centre
 
Redrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iggyloob12 View Post
That's not a serious offer.
Probably not, but the Flames should definitely have a steep salary dropoff beyond year 5 or 6.
Redrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2023, 11:17 AM   #9077
Saqe
#1 Goaltender
 
Saqe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
5 X $9.5
6 X $9
7 X $8.5
8 X $8

You choose, Elias

Why would he choose 5x9.5 if he can get 8x8. Makes no sense.
Saqe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2023, 11:26 AM   #9078
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saqe View Post
Why would he choose 5x9.5 if he can get 8x8. Makes no sense.
If he doesn't think that he can get a 3 year deal, in the $5.5M range, in 5 years, then he has no case to justify anything higher than an $8 X 8

(when negotiating, you want to walk the other side to where you want them)
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 10-14-2023, 12:05 PM   #9079
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saqe View Post
Why would he choose 5x9.5 if he can get 8x8. Makes no sense.
Depends on how he sees his value in 5.95 years I guess.

If you do a NPV at 6.5% on a 5 year 9.5M contract it's worth $39.5M.
If you do a NPV at 6.5% on a 8 year 8.0M contract it's worth $48.7M.

If he thinks he can play those additional three years he needs a 3 year $4.8M contract at that point in a big cap world to break the whole thing even in today's dollars.

If he thinks he'll only play two years he needs a 2 year $6.95M contract.

All depends on where he sees himself in 5.95 years. If he's still decently productive and good in his own end he might be smart to take the almost $60M in the first 5 years.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2023, 12:07 PM   #9080
Saqe
#1 Goaltender
 
Saqe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
If he doesn't think that he can get a 3 year deal, in the $5.5M range, in 5 years, then he has no case to justify anything higher than an $8 X 8

(when negotiating, you want to walk the other side to where you want them)

Logically yes but it's not how things work in reality. Players get eight year deals that almost always are bad at the end, especially if you sign them at 30. Plus there is always risk, quite a lot actually if you are betting on being healthy at 35 and getting another three year deal. There is no "justifying" of the latter part of the deal being bad.
Saqe is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:36 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy