View Poll Results: Would you want Jagr in Calgary on a 1yr reasonable deal?
|
Yes
|
  
|
671 |
85.15% |
No
|
  
|
117 |
14.85% |
09-07-2017, 11:12 AM
|
#781
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
It's interesting how he frames his monetary demands. He says money is a factor, but a big part of that is that he doesn't want to sign for so little that a team can feasibly take a roster spot away from him. I wonder if the hangup (in general, not necessarily just with Calgary) is that he wants a NMC.
|
This is the thing that erks me with some of these veteran players. Jagr says its not about money, but he wants to be paid enough, so no matter if he is bad, he is guaranteed a roster spot and gets his money.
I'm sorry but when you are a veteran near the end of your carreer, don't have a lot, if any, suitors then they should be signing PTO's. At most league minimum salaries with bonuses. They are the ones that need to prove they can still play. Management is not going to cut you if you deserve to be on the team.
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 11:17 AM
|
#782
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
I think more teams are interested and there's a lot more going on than what we know. Also, Jagr is at the stage of his career that he really doesn't need to keep playing but if he is, he wants to make sure it's in the NHL not in the minors. Jagr will help any team and not just on the scoreboard and I think he knows that, he's going to kind of be a player/coach combo who will help the entire team out and he knows it. He's offering more than just his playing ability. If you want everything he has to offer as a player, let alone just the hype of him playing, he's going to want to get paid.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 11:17 AM
|
#783
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
This is the thing that erks me with some of these veteran players. Jagr says its not about money, but he wants to be paid enough, so no matter if he is bad, he is guaranteed a roster spot and gets his money.
I'm sorry but when you are a veteran near the end of your carreer, don't have a lot, if any, suitors then they should be signing PTO's. At most league minimum salaries with bonuses. They are the ones that need to prove they can still play. Management is not going to cut you if you deserve to be on the team.
|
The guy can still play though, that's proven. And I don't see what is exactly wrong with wanting a big piece of the marketing pie which is a big reason why you're paying him to come play for your team anyway. I'd love to know what the sales spike is on Jerseys when Jagr signs. He's iconic.if he wants a million more than he deserves, I'm all for it.
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 11:22 AM
|
#784
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
This is the thing that erks me with some of these veteran players. Jagr says its not about money, but he wants to be paid enough, so no matter if he is bad, he is guaranteed a roster spot and gets his money.
I'm sorry but when you are a veteran near the end of your carreer, don't have a lot, if any, suitors then they should be signing PTO's. At most league minimum salaries with bonuses. They are the ones that need to prove they can still play. Management is not going to cut you if you deserve to be on the team.
|
But Jagr can still play. He had 46 points last year. Matthew Tkachuk only outscored 45 year old Jaromir Jagr by 2 points.
Jagr wants/wanted a reasonable amount of money for what he offers. 1 year, between 2-3M, hopefully closer to 2 than 3.
What he doesn't deserve is a PTO. He was 4th in team scoring last year - he deserves the benefit of the doubt.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”
Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 11:25 AM
|
#785
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
The guy can still play though, that's proven. And I don't see what is exactly wrong with wanting a big piece of the marketing pie which is a big reason why you're paying him to come play for your team anyway. I'd love to know what the sales spike is on Jerseys when Jagr signs. He's iconic.if he wants a million more than he deserves, I'm all for it.
|
My last jersey with a name and number on it was Joe Nieuwendyk. If Jagr signs with the Flames then I will get a Jagr jersey.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Buff For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-07-2017, 11:50 AM
|
#786
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames
I maintain my position on this
Signing Jagr now giving up nothing >> Trading assets or some of the Flames depleted picks to pick up a marginally better rental player at the deadline
|
The norm for Treliving though has not been to acquire rentals...but fixtures that are added to the core.
So what if he traded two of our near-blue-chip prospects for David Pasternak?
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 11:58 AM
|
#787
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyTitan
The norm for Treliving though has not been to acquire rentals...but fixtures that are added to the core.
So what if he traded two of our near-blue-chip prospects for David Pasternak?
|
Like which 2? Plus we dont have enough cap to re up Pastrnak without moving cap. Bruins are in win now (with Chara, Bergeron, Marchand, Rask), so would likely mean a good roster player going other way so maybe redundant.
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 12:02 PM
|
#788
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
How in the world did you interpret my post to mean what you are saying in bolded part?
|
I really fail to see what is not clear.
Are you looking for Foo to impress enough to merely squeak into a roster spot or are you looking for him to make an impact and help the Flames do something? If the kid somehow made the team (which he will not) for him to actually be of value to a contending team he would need to be down right dominant as far as a rookie standard goes.
If not, he is simply not going to be outperforming anyone on the roster, in the system or those available in FA like Jagr.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 12:03 PM
|
#789
|
Loves Teh Chat!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyTitan
The norm for Treliving though has not been to acquire rentals...but fixtures that are added to the core.
So what if he traded two of our near-blue-chip prospects for David Pasternak?
|
But he's also talked about different phases - not spending assets acquiring rentals until the window is really open. His deadline approach will likely change over the next few years if the Flames are legitimately looking like contenders.
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 01:23 PM
|
#790
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus
What is this fascination with dreaming that the latest shiny toy in the closet can step in and dominate right away?
There is almost no chance Foo is ready to play 82 games at a higher level than the seasoned pro prospects in the Flames system like Klimchuk, Jankowski, Poirier or even a FA legend like Jagr. At least with these guys you know they have the system down and have a much better chance of standing up to the rigors of the pro game this year.
To top it off Foo would have to beat out these prospects in addition to proven NHL bodies like Ferland, Frolik, Versteeg, possibly Tkachuk for top 9 duty on the wing. Not gonna happen.
|
I think its unlikely Foo makes the team as well. However we should acknowledge he's older than Klimchuk, Janko and Poirier and thus arguably more developed than some of them. Good prospects coming out of 3-4 year college careers often step in right away or fairly quickly. Chris Drury did, Steven Reinprecht did, Jordan Leopold did. Not saying he's those guys but there's a lot of precedent for college players to step in more quickly than guys coming out of junior. Jankowski obviously is more NHL ready as he's done a full 4 years of college and a year of pro so even though he's younger than Foo I'd have him as more NHL ready. But Klimchuk and Poirier? Klimchuk has missed a ton of time in the past few years due to injury. Poirier missed part of last season and has struggled. I'd say Foo is way more NHL ready than either of those guys.
Guys who should be NHL ready? Jankowski, Hathaway, Kulak, Wotherspoon
Guys who may compete? Foo, Andersson
That's how I see it.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-07-2017, 01:38 PM
|
#791
|
Not the 1 millionth post winnar
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles
|
Honest question - does anyone follow the Panthers closely enough to know why they didn't want Jagr back this season?
Or was it Jagr not wanting to go back?
__________________
"Isles give up 3 picks for 5.5 mil of cap space.
Oilers give up a pick and a player to take on 5.5 mil."
-Bax
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 01:45 PM
|
#792
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flashpoint
Honest question - does anyone follow the Panthers closely enough to know why they didn't want Jagr back this season?
Or was it Jagr not wanting to go back?
|
I feel like Cali Panthers Fan might be the best to ask that question. My theory is that, the youngsters like Barkov learned all they could from what Jagr was able to bring to the team. After seeing his production drop off in the latter half of the season, they maybe decided it was time to move forward in a different direction.
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 01:48 PM
|
#793
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
Guys who should be NHL ready? Jankowski, Hathaway, Kulak, Wotherspoon
Guys who may compete? Foo, Andersson
That's how I see it.
|
I keep hearing Andersson from people but the whole right/left thing has me doubtful.
He won't beat out Hamilton, Hamonic or Stone, and do you want him sitting? I think he has zero chance outside of playing so well they are forced to trade someone or an injury.
I think Kulak is inside track, Bartkowski vs Wotherspoon with Kylington the wild card. However once again Kylington would have to take them all out and nail down 6th or off to the AHL
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-07-2017, 02:37 PM
|
#794
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
I keep hearing Andersson from people but the whole right/left thing has me doubtful.
He won't beat out Hamilton, Hamonic or Stone, and do you want him sitting? I think he has zero chance outside of playing so well they are forced to trade someone or an injury.
I think Kulak is inside track, Bartkowski vs Wotherspoon with Kylington the wild card. However once again Kylington would have to take them all out and nail down 6th or off to the AHL
|
I'm with you, I think Andersson is in tough due to him being a RHD. However you never know if injuries will happen and I happen to think he's more NHL ready than Kylington or Valimaki so that's why I put him where I did. If he blows everyone away perhaps they put two righties on the bottom pairing. But I'd say Kulak is the favourite to win that #6 role with Wotherspoon and Bartkowski the next favourites.
Kylington isn't NHL ready IMO. He doesn't possess NHL strength, consistency and defensive play yet. Great prospect but I think he needs at least another half year, probably more. No rush for him. I almost think Valimaki has a better chance of making the team than Kylington as I feel his game is a lot more mature. But I don't think either will make it.
I've basically already pencilled Kulak in personally. I think its his spot to lose. I think Wotherspoon vs Bartkowski should be an interesting battle.
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 02:43 PM
|
#795
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
|
Kulak - its his spot to lose on the D-line. Wotherspoon really needs to have a good camp or this may be his last crack at making the Flames.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Otto-matic For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-07-2017, 02:46 PM
|
#796
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto-matic
Kulak - its his spot to lose on the D-line. Wotherspoon really needs to have a good camp or this may be his last crack at making the Flames.
|
Wotherspoon has to come to camp and be better than Bartkowski. I think Andersson has to be better than all of them to make the team out of camp, but Spoon has one guy to beat and he's here full time.
Is he not one of the better analytic D in the AHL? Am I making that up?
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 02:55 PM
|
#797
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
|
If someone from the right side is injured, I expect Andersson to be called up. The only other option is to move Brodie back to the right side.
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 03:07 PM
|
#798
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Lethbridge
|
OK enough dman talk back to Jagr
__________________
Calgary Flames #1 St. Louis Cardinals #1
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 03:13 PM
|
#799
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaudreau is a Ninja
OK enough dman talk back to Jagr 
|
What about Jankowski?
Have we signed Boyd yet?
What can we get for Agostino? Maybe Crosby?
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-07-2017, 03:18 PM
|
#800
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
What about Jankowski?
Have we signed Boyd yet?
What can we get for Agostino? Maybe Crosby?
|
What is ole Dustin Boyd up to these days? Europe?
__________________
Calgary Flames #1 St. Louis Cardinals #1
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:29 PM.
|
|