View Poll Results: Would you want Jagr in Calgary on a 1yr reasonable deal?
|
Yes
|
  
|
671 |
85.15% |
No
|
  
|
117 |
14.85% |
09-07-2017, 09:01 AM
|
#761
|
Franchise Player
|
He won't do a PTO.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 09:25 AM
|
#762
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Par
What happens to Foo if Jagr signs here?
|
Clearly, we have to murder him.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”
Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 09:49 AM
|
#763
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey008
Offer Jagr a PTO to start!
|
You don't insult a player like Jagr with a PTO. There is no understanding of honour in this world anymore.
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 09:49 AM
|
#764
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Par
What happens to Foo if Jagr signs here?
|
If Foo makes the opening day roster the team has bigger problems to worry about than spending a little too much on Jagr. Kid needs some time to learn the pro game. Signing Jagr makes far too much sense with Bennett coming in at a reasonable hit.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 09:56 AM
|
#765
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: 0° latitude, 0° longitude
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus
If Foo makes the opening day roster the team has bigger problems to worry about than spending a little too much on Jagr. Kid needs some time to learn the pro game. Signing Jagr makes far too much sense with Bennett coming in at a reasonable hit.
|
not if he earns it
__________________
Let the Yutes play!
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Demetric For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-07-2017, 09:58 AM
|
#766
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus
If Foo makes the opening day roster the team has bigger problems to worry about than spending a little too much on Jagr...
|
These sorts of "if ... then" assertions really annoy me. If Foo is really good enough he could conceivably make the Flames on opening night, and it wouldn't be an indictment of the quality of the rest of the team.
I think he plays in Stockton, but I am not settled on that being the best outcome.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-07-2017, 10:12 AM
|
#767
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
These sorts of "if ... then" assertions really annoy me. If Foo is really good enough he could conceivably make the Flames on opening night, and it wouldn't be an indictment of the quality of the rest of the team.
I think he plays in Stockton, but I am not settled on that being the best outcome.
|
A team that is about to enter contender status should not need to press a college player like Foo to play in one of the top 3 RW positions during his first pro season even if he looks like he can handle it.....specifically straight out of training camp. A jump from playing 40 some games a year into the trenches against the best players in the world is very challenging and is only done by the best of the best prospects.
If your assessment is such that he would make the team only to play 4th line minutes then he would absolutely be better off doing what Jankowski (a much better prospect than Foo) did by playing a huge role in Stockton for a year....something that didn't hurt him at all.
As it stands now the Flames definitely need some extra punch on the wing. I'd rather risk Jagr at a low AAV for one year than rolling the dice on a kid like Foo even if he appears ready. In the long run he will be a much better player by eating some huge minutes in the AHL on what should be a very solid team.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
Last edited by Hot_Flatus; 09-07-2017 at 10:15 AM.
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 10:18 AM
|
#768
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus
A team that is about to enter contender status should not need to press a college player like Foo to play in one of the top 3 RW positions during his first pro season even if he looks like he can handle it.....specifically straight out of training camp. A jump from playing 40 some games a year into the trenches against the best players in the world is very challenging and is only done by the best of the best prospects.
If your assessment is such that he would make the team only to play 4th line minutes then he would absolutely be better off doing what Jankowski (a much better prospect than Foo) did by playing a huge role in Stockton for a year....something that didn't hurt him at all.
As it stands now the Flames definitely need some extra punch on the wing. I'd rather risk Jagr at a low AAV for one year than rolling the dice on a kid like Foo even if he appears ready. In the long run he will be a much better player by eating some huge minutes in the AHL on what should be a very solid team.
|
But him making the team is not the same as pressing him to play. Having a young player impress in camp and make the team is about the best thing that could happen to these Flames. I don't really care who it is.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Strange Brew For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-07-2017, 10:27 AM
|
#769
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
I think it's almost a guarantee that Foo starts in the AHL. Management have indicated as such. I would rank Jankowski as a better prospect than Foo and Jankowski played a full season in the AHL prior to now getting his shot at the NHL roster.
It's just wishful thinking that Foo can make the NHL roster from opening night. I suggest people not to set themselves for that line of thinking, because the chance of that happening is minimal.
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 10:30 AM
|
#770
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by robaur
I think it's almost a guarantee that Foo starts in the AHL. Management have indicated as such. I would rank Jankowski as a better prospect than Foo and Jankowski played a full season in the AHL prior to now getting his shot at the NHL roster.
It's just wishful thinking that Foo can make the NHL roster from opening night. I suggest people not to set themselves for that line of thinking, because the chance of that happening is minimal.
|
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 10:35 AM
|
#771
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by robaur
I think it's almost a guarantee that Foo starts in the AHL. Management have indicated as such. I would rank Jankowski as a better prospect than Foo and Jankowski played a full season in the AHL prior to now getting his shot at the NHL roster.
It's just wishful thinking that Foo can make the NHL roster from opening night. I suggest people not to set themselves for that line of thinking, because the chance of that happening is minimal.
|
Is that a fact? I seem to recall both Treliving and Craig Conroy suggesting that Foo could push for a spot in camp.
Like I said, I think Foo will almost certainly start in Stockton, but based on statements from management since he was signed I sure don't think it qualifies as "wishful thinking" to imagine that he might actually crack the Flames roster.
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 10:38 AM
|
#772
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
|
Jags would be an amazing addition.
Gaudreau-Monahan-Ferland
Tkachuk-Bennett-Jagr
Versteeg-Backlund-Frolik
Lazar-Stajan-Brouwer
Hathaway
First players to be called up:
Foo and Jankowski
If only we can get rid of one of Stajan or Brouwer.. then one of the kids can take their spot
Last edited by keenan87; 09-07-2017 at 10:45 AM.
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 10:41 AM
|
#773
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
I maintain my position on this
Signing Jagr now giving up nothing >> Trading assets or some of the Flames depleted picks to pick up a marginally better rental player at the deadline
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to djsFlames For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-07-2017, 10:43 AM
|
#774
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
But him making the team is not the same as pressing him to play. Having a young player impress in camp and make the team is about the best thing that could happen to these Flames. I don't really care who it is.
|
What is this fascination with dreaming that the latest shiny toy in the closet can step in and dominate right away?
There is almost no chance Foo is ready to play 82 games at a higher level than the seasoned pro prospects in the Flames system like Klimchuk, Jankowski, Poirier or even a FA legend like Jagr. At least with these guys you know they have the system down and have a much better chance of standing up to the rigors of the pro game this year.
To top it off Foo would have to beat out these prospects in addition to proven NHL bodies like Ferland, Frolik, Versteeg, possibly Tkachuk for top 9 duty on the wing. Not gonna happen.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 10:45 AM
|
#775
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
My ideal lines with Jagr:
Gaudreau-Monahan-Jagr
Tkachuk-Bennett-Ferland
Frolik-Backlund-Lazar
Versteeg-Jankowski-Brouwer
Stajan
Jagr as Ferland could be interchanged. I really like the truculence of the Bennett line which is why I start Ferland there.
The Flames believe in Lazar and want him to be successful so why not put him in the spot where so many of players (Bouma, Colborne, Bennett, Tkachuk) have thrived before?
Jankowski gets 2 experienced wingers to play with. Versteeg can make plays and Brouwer is also a lever of the team
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 10:50 AM
|
#776
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
My ideal lines with Jagr:
Gaudreau-Monahan-Jagr
Tkachuk-Bennett-Ferland
Frolik-Backlund-Lazar
Versteeg-Jankowski-Brouwer
Stajan
Jagr as Ferland could be interchanged. I really like the truculence of the Bennett line which is why I start Ferland there.
The Flames believe in Lazar and want him to be successful so why not put him in the spot where so many of players (Bouma, Colborne, Bennett, Tkachuk) have thrived before?
Jankowski gets 2 experienced wingers to play with. Versteeg can make plays and Brouwer is also a lever of the team
|
For me I really like the idea of putting Tkachuk with Monohan and Gaudreau on his off wing. He would give that line some definite grit with much more hockey sense and finishing ability than Ferland last year.
I'd also slide Bennett back to the wing with the Micheal's to get his offensive game going. Surrounding a rookie like Jankowski with two highly skilled and intelligent veteran wingers in Versteeg and Jagr would produce some serious magic as well.
Monohan - Gaudreau - Tkachuk
Bennett - Backlund - Frolik
Versteeg - Jankowski - Jagr
Lazar/Brouwer - Stajan - Ferland
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
Last edited by Hot_Flatus; 09-07-2017 at 10:53 AM.
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 11:00 AM
|
#777
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
But him making the team is not the same as pressing him to play. Having a young player impress in camp and make the team is about the best thing that could happen to these Flames. I don't really care who it is.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus
What is this fascination with dreaming that the latest shiny toy in the closet can step in and dominate right away?
There is almost no chance Foo is ready to play 82 games at a higher level than the seasoned pro prospects in the Flames system like Klimchuk, Jankowski, Poirier or even a FA legend like Jagr. At least with these guys you know they have the system down and have a much better chance of standing up to the rigors of the pro game this year.
To top it off Foo would have to beat out these prospects in addition to proven NHL bodies like Ferland, Frolik, Versteeg, possibly Tkachuk for top 9 duty on the wing. Not gonna happen.
|
How in the world did you interpret my post to mean what you are saying in bolded part?
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 11:04 AM
|
#778
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames
I maintain my position on this
Signing Jagr now giving up nothing >> Trading assets or some of the Flames depleted picks to pick up a marginally better rental player at the deadline
|
Definitely. And having someone for full season >> deadline acquisition.
But there's risk with Jagr too and by the deadline you might find there are players available that are more than marginally better.
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 11:04 AM
|
#779
|
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
|
Someone should photoshop a flaming C on Milhouse and Jagr to Nelson.
|
|
|
09-07-2017, 11:10 AM
|
#780
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus
What is this fascination with dreaming that the latest shiny toy in the closet can step in and dominate right away?
There is almost no chance Foo is ready to play 82 games at a higher level than the seasoned pro prospects in the Flames system like Klimchuk, Jankowski, Poirier or even a FA legend like Jagr. At least with these guys you know they have the system down and have a much better chance of standing up to the rigors of the pro game this year.
To top it off Foo would have to beat out these prospects in addition to proven NHL bodies like Ferland, Frolik, Versteeg, possibly Tkachuk for top 9 duty on the wing. Not gonna happen.
|
To be honest I shake my head at organizations that have their minds made up to either extreme.
MacTavish famously giving a spot to Draisaitl before camp three years ago was complete stupidity, so I'm with you don't pencil anyone in.
But it's equally silly to have a view that a player won't make it before camp starts. Teams need to let chips fall where they fall and don't have roster written in pen before camp starts.
I didn't think Tkachuk would stick last year for example... Foo is no Tkachuk but if he beats everyone out for a top nine spot on the right side then go for it. If he falters you send him down later.
Minds open.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:55 PM.
|
|