Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-07-2025, 01:33 PM   #61
calculoso
Franchise Player
 
calculoso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knut View Post
That sounds more like an Oilers thing does it not.

Bad auto-correct
calculoso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2025, 01:33 PM   #62
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theironmaiden View Post
can we ad a poll to this thread to give the flames a grade?
f.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2025, 01:35 PM   #63
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

If the Flames had significant UFAs the naysayers would have a point but they didnt.
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2025, 01:38 PM   #64
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
f.
Christ what would you give them if they bought rentals
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2025, 01:40 PM   #65
JurassicTunga12
Franchise Player
 
JurassicTunga12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

JurassicTunga12 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JurassicTunga12 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2025, 01:41 PM   #66
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden View Post
Can we ad a poll to this thread to give the Flames a grade?
[ ] A
[ ] B
[ ] C
[ ] D
[ ] E

[X] None of the above.
__________________
"9 out of 10 concerns are completely unfounded."

"The first thing that goes when you lose your hands, are your fine motor skills."
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2025, 01:42 PM   #67
MacDaddy77
First Line Centre
 
MacDaddy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Exp:
Default

We made our deadline deal early acquiring 2x 20 goal players. Frost and Farabee will be key contributors for a few years to come.

(I know Frost hasn't hit 20 but I think he'll be a consistant~20 goal 40-50pt Centre and is at 0.5pts/gm avv)
MacDaddy77 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2025, 01:43 PM   #68
howard_the_duck
#1 Goaltender
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Given the Carlo package, disappointing we weren't able to move Rasmus.
howard_the_duck is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to howard_the_duck For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2025, 01:43 PM   #69
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

I'd give the Flames a B-

Glad they didn't trade away any assets.
Sorry they couldn't help teams with retention.
OK with not trading Vets, given the contract control and alleged poor offers.
I wish they could have moved Vladar, or one of Coleman, Kadri, Backlund, Huberdeau who all kind of fill the same niche.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2025, 01:44 PM   #70
Icon
Franchise Player
 
Icon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck View Post
Given the Carlo package, disappointing we weren't able to move Rasmus.
Should have been working HARD to trade him to Toronto especially.
Icon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2025, 01:44 PM   #71
Toast_Man
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck View Post
Given the Carlo package, disappointing we weren't able to move Rasmus.
oh man, I'd love to have Minten.
Toast_Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2025, 01:44 PM   #72
Sofa GM
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

To do nothing with all the cap space, a low amount of quality immediate prospect, and aging veterans while standing on making playoffs with a clearly highly overachieving group feels like pretty poor management.
Sofa GM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2025, 01:45 PM   #73
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Hopefully we can call Kerins and Solo back up, and maybe give Stromgren and Kuznetsov an opportunity.

The Wranglers with just 1 win in the last 11 are dropping fast, many of the games aren't even close so I don't think it will make much of a difference for their playoff hopes.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2025, 01:49 PM   #74
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly View Post
Hopefully we can call Kerins and Solo back up, and maybe give Stromgren and Kuznetsov an opportunity.

The Wranglers with just 1 win in the last 11 are dropping fast, many of the games aren't even close so I don't think it will make much of a difference for their playoff hopes.
That only happens if we fall out of race. We have to many forwards as is.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2025, 01:53 PM   #75
MacDaddy77
First Line Centre
 
MacDaddy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sofa GM View Post
To do nothing with all the cap space, a low amount of quality immediate prospect, and aging veterans while standing on making playoffs with a clearly highly overachieving group feels like pretty poor management.
I personally dont see it that way. This year MAY be an outlier but maybe not, ride the cap space into next year and if this team continues to push for playoffs 2025/26 we can inject more top end talent on entry level deals (Parekh, Basha/Battaglia) then we make our move.

If this year was an outlier then we trade away (Raz/Coleman/Sharongovich) and be in a position to get high Draft fingers crossed McKenna

Conroy was/is very open about the plan and that this will be built the right way and that is through the draft.
MacDaddy77 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2025, 01:53 PM   #76
PaperBagger'14
Franchise Player
 
PaperBagger'14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Cowtown
Exp:
Default

D grade from me.

Positives:
-Didn’t overpay for any tenured roster players
-Didn’t trade any draft capital for rentals

Negatives:
-Was unable to sell even one aging vet for a high return, despite many other trades with valuable assets changing hands.
-Didn’t acquire any younger players who’s age and contract status fit Conroys vision
-Team is trending towards a middling draft pick which will be sent to MTL
-Did not “weaponize” cap space for additional picks.

Could have been a worse TDL, but not by much.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by puckhog View Post
Everyone who disagrees with you is stupid
PaperBagger'14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to PaperBagger'14 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2025, 01:53 PM   #77
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon View Post
Should have been working HARD to trade him to Toronto especially.
It honestly wouldn't surprise me if Tre is on Edwards no trade list
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2025, 01:55 PM   #78
PuckSlap
Powerplay Quarterback
 
PuckSlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Exp:
Default

I guess I’ll grade them a D for disappointing.. it was just boring and we all know where this season ends, and the next begins. Somewhere in the middle

I’m glad we didn’t get useless rentals. But I really want to lose some of the dead weight. Not that it’s easy to get rid of those players.

So I rate them

B: for boring
D: for disappointing
And C: for consistency
PuckSlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2025, 01:56 PM   #79
CroCop
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Missed opportunities today and we remain mid.
CroCop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2025, 01:57 PM   #80
Hackey
Franchise Player
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

They didn't do anything stupid, which is good. They didn't do anything to improve the team for the future, which is not good. It's what I expected, though. Short term playoff hopes over long term Stanley Cup goals.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:34 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy