03-07-2025, 01:19 PM
|
#41
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
Yeah that's what I don't get either. Other teams are getting overpayments but Flames only able to get low ball offers.
Seems to me like it's more that Flames just weren't willing to actually be open to discussions and negotiations to try to unlock more of that value.
|
Or… there are hundreds and thousands of discussions with the majority being low ball offers, and only the top couple percent actually lead to trades
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to calculoso For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:20 PM
|
#42
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
|
Never fall too in love with your older players.
In a few years they'll all be deadweight eating up roster spots, unless we buy out the remainder of the contracts.
I hope discussions were had.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TrentCrimmIndependent For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:21 PM
|
#43
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
|
Can we ad a poll to this thread to give the Flames a grade?
|
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:21 PM
|
#44
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Not necessarily today, but it feels like a wasted opportunity this season to not have weaponized our cap space with some sort of retention trade.
I get not wanting to for two years, but there were opportunities before today to have used it.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to howard_the_duck For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:21 PM
|
#45
|
Scoring Winger
|
Wow. Not even the obligatory "5th rounder for a depth defenseman who does nothing and leaves as a free agent"
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ba'alzamon For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:23 PM
|
#46
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
Yeah that's what I don't get either. Other teams are getting overpayments but Flames only able to get low ball offers.
Seems to me like it's more that Flames just weren't willing to actually be open to discussions and negotiations to try to unlock more of that value.
|
I believe that it was the cmpdave guy on twitter that said he heard the return that conny was asking for Anderson was unrealistically high. Wouldn’t be surprised if that was for all other vets also. I think conny really wanted to reward this team by keeping it together for now. Granted I still think they have to trade Anderson and a forward this summer.
|
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:23 PM
|
#47
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
Can they get a refund on their war room setup in Dallas?
|
Live look at the Flames War room
|
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:23 PM
|
#48
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calculoso
Or… there are hundreds and thousands of discussions with the majority being low ball offers, and only the top couple percent actually lead to trades
|
Is the league colluding to lowball the Flames.
Probably not. It's more likely that Conroy probably wasn't as open to trading anyone at the deadline.
Royle has told us he wanted an offer that blew his socks off for Andersson. What that is who knows, but I can't see teams sending multiple 1sts for a quickly declining player that is going to command a big deal.
|
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:23 PM
|
#49
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacDaddy77
Live look at the Flames War room

|
Are you saying Conroy has Trump work hours?
|
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:24 PM
|
#50
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts
Is the league colluding to lowball the Flames.
Probably not. It's more likely that Conroy probably wasn't as open to trading anyone at the deadline.
Royle has told us he wanted an offer that blew his socks off for Andersson. What that is who knows, but I can't see teams sending multiple 1sts for a quickly declining player that is going to command a big deal.
|
Driving a hard bargain is not a bad long term strategy. Especially since he has 365 days to trade Andersson.
|
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:24 PM
|
#51
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts
Is the league colluding to lowball the Flames. .
|
I meant hundreds and thousands of lowball offers across the league. Not just for the Flames.
|
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:25 PM
|
#52
|
First Line Centre
|
I am shocked after we got all those Gifs over the last week.
Last time I ever buy the Gif hype!
|
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:28 PM
|
#53
|
Franchise Player
|
Can I somehow get my morning back?
__________________
"9 out of 10 concerns are completely unfounded."
"The first thing that goes when you lose your hands, are your fine motor skills."
|
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:30 PM
|
#55
|
Scoring Winger
|
Was really hoping for a Cozens-like acquisition or an Andersson trade. Glad we didn't spend assets on depth though. I get why Conroy didn't make any moves but still a little disappointed
|
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:31 PM
|
#56
|
Bingo's Official Offspring Yes My Dad Knows I'm Here
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett44
I am shocked after we got all those Gifs over the last week.
Last time I ever buy the Gif hype!
|
Give it a rest. You're acting like there aren't hundreds of rumours that don't pan out every year.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bingo Jr. For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:31 PM
|
#57
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ontario
|
Flames do not make any trades on trade deadline day
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett44
I am shocked after we got all those Gifs over the last week.
Last time I ever buy the Gif hype!
|
It sounded like the Flames WERE in on Cozens but decided not to pay. The Gifs weren’t hype.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to calculoso For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:31 PM
|
#58
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
Yeah that's what I don't get either. Other teams are getting overpayments but Flames only able to get low ball offers.
Seems to me like it's more that Flames just weren't willing to actually be open to discussions and negotiations to try to unlock more of that value.
|
They have Kadri, Coleman, Backlund, Weegar, and Andersson as vets with varying levels of value. Andersson is the only one with limited trade protection and an easy move this deadline and I’m not going to get heated after what happened with Markstrom last year. Coleman’s and Kadri’s contracts lengths are probably more of deterrent than a value add at this point. If those guys move it will be in the off-season after July 1st.
|
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:32 PM
|
#59
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calculoso
It sounded like the Flames WERE in on Cousins but decided not to pay. The Gifs weren’t hype.
|
That sounds more like an Oilers thing does it not.
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Knut For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-07-2025, 01:32 PM
|
#60
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Unless they swung for another Frost type deal it makes sense to not do much. Weird that they priced themselves out of salary retention flipping.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:59 PM.
|
|