12-06-2024, 10:40 AM
|
#61
|
|
All I can get
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13
|
Ed Giacomin on waivers???!!
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Reggie Dunlop For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 10:41 AM
|
#62
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
if the jackets get him for close to free, they've made some pretty interesting moves to build a not bad d-core (except the Jiricek trade, didn't much like that).
Werenski - Fabbri
Provorov - Severson
Trouba - Gudbranson
isn't a bad group
|
|
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 10:43 AM
|
#63
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saqe
Ottawa can't be that stupid, can they.
|
Brady may end up eventually forcing their hand (maybe he already is?). He's tired of being on a losing team, and Ottawa has made a number of significant mistakes in team building:
To ARZ: 1st, 2nd, 2nd
To OTT: Chychrun
One year later, they trade Chychrun for a 3rd and Jensen. Woof.
To CHI: 1st (7th overall), 2nd (39th overall), 3rd
To OTT: Debrincat
One year later, they trade Debrincat for a 1st, and 4th. Yikes.
That's just beyond stupidity.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 10:44 AM
|
#64
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly
Sooooo…… you’re stuck with a team when you have a NMC?
|
No. I'm talking about the team not being able to put a NMC guy on waivers. A player can waive any condition he wants. The two uses of waive are entirely different.
|
|
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 10:53 AM
|
#65
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor
if the jackets get him for close to free, they've made some pretty interesting moves to build a not bad d-core (except the Jiricek trade, didn't much like that).
Werenski - Fabbri
Provorov - Severson
Trouba - Gudbranson
isn't a bad group
|
Definitely leave with a few bruises playing that team
|
|
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 10:56 AM
|
#66
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
|
If Ottawa trades Tkachuk, somebody needs to fired immediately. You don’t trade a guy like that unless he wants out and forces your hand.
Not that I believe the rumor.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sandman For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 11:00 AM
|
#67
|
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 11:04 AM
|
#68
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman
If Ottawa trades Tkachuk, somebody needs to fired immediately. You don’t trade a guy like that unless he wants out and forces your hand.
Not that I believe the rumor.
|
That being the key part. If Brady gets traded, it's going to be because Brady wanted to get traded.
|
|
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 11:05 AM
|
#69
|
|
Pent-up
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
|
Is this actually about where he built a house? That’s the smoke?
|
|
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 11:08 AM
|
#70
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
That being the key part. If Brady gets traded, it's going to be because Brady wanted to get traded.
|
It would have to be a massive package going back the other way, perhaps including Laf…
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Sandman For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 11:09 AM
|
#71
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers
Is this actually about where he built a house? That’s the smoke?
|
I would bet Matthew asking for a trade, then going to the Stanley cup finals 2 years in a row and winning a cup could have impacted Brady if he has asked to be traded.
|
|
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 11:10 AM
|
#72
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Hopefully somebody wants someone to eat part of Trouba's deal for a sweetener. Maybe? Hopefully.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 11:12 AM
|
#73
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe
Hopefully somebody wants someone to eat part of Trouba's deal for a sweetener. Maybe? Hopefully.
|
I doubt they will. They probably aren't getting a good return and would rather waive than retain. I'm sure Columbus, SJ, Chicago would all be interested in Trouba for free.
|
|
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 11:15 AM
|
#74
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Emily Kaplan says, CLB, OTT, BUF, DET are who she has heard are in on Trouba. Interesting to see Ottawa.
|
Haha, pick your poison Trouba.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 11:15 AM
|
#75
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe
Hopefully somebody wants someone to eat part of Trouba's deal for a sweetener. Maybe? Hopefully.
|
Only problem is Flames have limited retention spots due to the Markstrom trade
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Geeoff For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 11:17 AM
|
#76
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978
I doubt they will. They probably aren't getting a good return and would rather waive than retain. I'm sure Columbus, SJ, Chicago would all be interested in Trouba for free.
|
I think he means a middle trading partner to take part of the retention of the salary on for a 4th round pick or something. And then trade to the ultimate destination. NYC can trade Trouba to that team 50% and that team trades 50% retained to the ultimate recipient and they end up with Trouba for $2M.
So would the Flames pay Trouba $2M for a year and a half for a 4th?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 11:18 AM
|
#77
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman
It would have to be a massive package going back the other way, perhaps including Laf…
|
Probably something stupid like a high scoring forward one year away from free agency, a good defenceman one year from free agency, a 1st, and some sort of recent 2nd round pick.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 11:21 AM
|
#78
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
I think he means a middle trading partner to take part of the retention of the salary on for a 4th round pick or something. And then trade to the ultimate destination. NYC can trade Trouba to that team 50% and that team trades 50% retained to the ultimate recipient and they end up with Trouba for $2M.
So would the Flames pay Trouba $2M for a year and a half for a 4th?
|
Yeah you are right. Mis read that.
4th isn't enough to retain for 2 years and waste one of our spots.
Rumored teams don't really need it either
|
|
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 11:22 AM
|
#79
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978
Yeah you are right. Mis read that.
4th isn't enough to retain for 2 years and waste one of our spots.
Rumored teams don't really need it either
|
Agreed, if the Flames would use a retention, return is higher than a 4th.
|
|
|
|
|
12-06-2024, 11:23 AM
|
#80
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978
Yeah you are right. Mis read that.
4th isn't enough to retain for 2 years and waste one of our spots.
Rumored teams don't really need it either
|
True, though I don't see why the rumoured teams want Trouba at all - he's a guy a contender adds, not a developer. There's gotta be a lot bigger trade if it's say, Ottawa.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:12 PM.
|
|
