Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-18-2015, 08:03 AM   #61
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Hiller to the Sabres for pick 31 (Brandon Carlo) and then make a deal for Lehner! If they want a goalie in return, who could we give up?
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 08:06 AM   #62
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Top 6 forward and a pick is laughable.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 08:10 AM   #63
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
Hiller to the Sabres for pick 31 (Brandon Carlo) and then make a deal for Lehner! If they want a goalie in return, who could we give up?
Hiller has one more year on his deal. That would be a pretty bad trade for a team that is obviously rebuilding.
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 08:12 AM   #64
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

ya, I know.... but they do need a starter. Maybe if we ask really nicely? lol

What teams need a starter or an upgrade (if Hiller is that). It's hard to tell what teams could actually want Hiller.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 08:14 AM   #65
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan View Post
Hiller has one more year on his deal. That would be a pretty bad trade for a team that is obviously rebuilding.

Especially one that trades away any starting goalie they get their hands on!

Though maybe now that they've tanked and got Eichel, they'll actually want to start an NHL goalie?
heep223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 08:27 AM   #66
Demetric
Scoring Winger
 
Demetric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: 0° latitude, 0° longitude
Exp:
Default

yeah dont see a fit. BT not going to bring in another goalie unless 1 is moving out. This would be Hiller as Ortio has shown great promise. Ramo for all intents and purposes is already gone. The same rule applies regarding signing Ramo. We will not run 3 goalies.
Demetric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 08:35 AM   #67
edslunch
Franchise Player
 
edslunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default Flames interested in Robin Lehner

I don't see what's wrong with Hiller and Ortio for next year. Hiller is ok, let Ortio win as much playing time as he can. Next season either Gillies is ready for backup (likely not) or sign another vet to backup

If Ortio isn't ready to be the starter in a year then sure there's an issue

Last edited by edslunch; 06-18-2015 at 09:26 AM.
edslunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 08:40 AM   #68
SofaProfessor
Scoring Winger
 
SofaProfessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Nothing against Lehner but I don't see why you do this unless it has been decided that Ramo isn't being signed and there are talks to move Hiller. Even then, why pay the cost for a goalie that's really no better than what's currently in hand?
__________________
SofaProfessor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 08:43 AM   #69
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Love all the eggs into the Gillies basket. Doesn't it typically take at least 3 years in the minors for an NCAA goalie to make it to the NHL if he makes it at all?

The old Sutterism comes to mind here: "Goaltending is never a problem until you don't have any." Basically, Ortio is promising but the verdict is still way out, Ramo is gone so we have Hiller as the only proven NHL goalie. What if Hiller or Ortio get injured?

What if you could trade for a huge athletic 24 year old goalie between a guy who's gone to FA next year, a promising but unproven AHL prospect and a college prospect who's 3 years away?

Look no further than St. Louis to describe what a lack of goaltending depth can do to your Cup aspirations.
Tinordi is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tinordi For This Useful Post:
Old 06-18-2015, 08:47 AM   #70
bettman
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Exp:
Default

Any interest in Brian Elliott of STL for 1 year at 2.5 Million? Blues tight to cap and want change look of goaltenders for next year. I think Ramo doesn't want back and Hiller not thrilled about playing for Hartley either. Notoriously hard on goaltenders.
bettman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 08:51 AM   #71
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

I'd take Lehner... but only if we had another trade lined up for Hiller and the return was of comparable value as to what we'd give to Ottawa.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 08:53 AM   #72
bettman
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Exp:
Default

On Ottawa some think they want to off load Colin Greening as part of any deal..he's 6'3" 210 lbs.
bettman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 09:03 AM   #73
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
Love all the eggs into the Gillies basket. Doesn't it typically take at least 3 years in the minors for an NCAA goalie to make it to the NHL if he makes it at all?
Some were even suggesting that Gillies dress or even start in the playoffs. I'll never understand why some fans want to immediately rush prospects to the NHL especially when they haven't earned it yet, which just so happens to go against the core of the current team.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 09:04 AM   #74
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SofaProfessor View Post
Nothing against Lehner but I don't see why you do this unless it has been decided that Ramo isn't being signed and there are talks to move Hiller. Even then, why pay the cost for a goalie that's really no better than what's currently in hand?
Until Ramo's signed, there is a danger that he won't be. And Ortio has 6 games under his belt (in which he looked great in a couple, good in a couple and just OK in his two losses). I wouldn't be putting all the eggs in the Ortio basket just yet.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 09:09 AM   #75
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bettman View Post
he's 6'3" 210 lbs.
He costs $2.6M and had 1 goal before passing through waivers and playing in the AHL... I think those are more important figures then his height and weight.

That being said if taking him on made the acquisition cost on Lehner cheaper I'd still be fine with it if we could move out Bollig in the process.

Last edited by Parallex; 06-18-2015 at 09:12 AM.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 09:12 AM   #76
lambeburger
Powerplay Quarterback
 
lambeburger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Dreger says Flames interested in Cam Talbot: https://twitter.com/DarrenDreger/sta...49774911799296
lambeburger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 09:20 AM   #77
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Some of all this "Flames are interested..." stuff is likely due to the factor Freidman mentioned the other day - Treliving doesn't feel right unless he has at least made inquiries on every player who is likely available. He doesn't want to say he missed out or never heard a guy was on the market.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 09:40 AM   #78
TurdFerguson
Franchise Player
 
TurdFerguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Goalie prosecutes, even high-end ones, are such a crap shoot. Load the system with as many as you can carry/develop and try to stack your chances. Maybe Lehner goes Ben Bishop...or maybe he goes Jocob Markstrom...Its so hard to project.

value the risk according. Raymond + mid pick is worth the risk imo. That said, gotta think OTT is anxious about shipping out the wrong goalie, AGAIN...
__________________
All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity - Gordie Howe
TurdFerguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 10:26 AM   #79
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

I would trade one of our 2nds for Talbot or Lehner but it appears we've entered the twilight zone and now goalies suddenly have amazing trade value. I'm sure this is somehow Edmonton's fault. Their desperation has a way of changing reality for all NHL teams.

I wonder if we picked up Greening AND Legwand in the same trade, if we could get Lehner for a song? We could stuff those two guys in the AHL, we could easily afford it, no way another team would pick up two cap dumps. Stockton might even benefit by having a couple vets around though it would likely spell the end for Hanowski and someone else.

Just thinking out loud, I know it would be stupid/crazy to pick up Legwand and Greening.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2015, 10:52 AM   #80
Imported_Aussie
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Would the Flames maybe be a good partner with Ottawa in a trade for Lehner as they could take on Greening and his cap hit?
Lehner and Greening for a 2nd round pick, then bury/buy out Greening?
Ottawa don't get that forward they want, but they save $$ to make a deal/sign a UFA. Ottawa have stated they don't want to buy out Greening, as they feel a trade can be made
Imported_Aussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:28 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy