Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-26-2015, 04:31 PM   #61
JohnnySkittles
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: NB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Because Columbus is not a market that can be paying 6 million for nothing like the Leafs can. If those dollars are being eaten, they need something for it.
So what you're saying is that Columbus is more of a budget team and just because they had him on LTIR, doesn't mean they could've spent that 6M else where?
JohnnySkittles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2015, 04:31 PM   #62
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Aaron Portzline @Aportzline
#CBJ did not have insurance on Nathan Horton, so they would have had to pay the full amount of his contract for the rest of his term.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2015, 04:32 PM   #63
Bring_Back_Shantz
Franchise Player
 
Bring_Back_Shantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Default

The more I think if it, the more this trade makes sense for both teams.

Columbs is now paying less out of pocket, and they have someone who can at least be a 3rd/4th liner in Clarkson.
Toronto on the other hand is paying more out of pocket, but gains some cap space.

So basically, it kind of works out as Toronto paying a $1 MM of Horton's salary, and Clarkson is playing for free in Columbus.

Pretty clever by both sides.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
<-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
Bring_Back_Shantz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bring_Back_Shantz For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2015, 04:33 PM   #64
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
That doesn't make this any less confusing.

Flames looking at moving out Raymond and Stajan to make room to take on Horton? If true we are a very strange org.
It would have been Horton + young player for Stajan + Raymond. Or so I am told.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2015, 04:33 PM   #65
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Genius move by both teams. Toronto - a very rich team - gets the cap space every year remaining on Horton's contract when he goes on LTIR.

Columbus gets an actual player for the money they would be dishing out.

Genius is overstating it I guess, but probably as close to a 'win-win' under the circumstances.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2015, 04:33 PM   #66
IliketoPuck
Franchise Player
 
IliketoPuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The way I was thinking of it was a bit different I guess. Thanks for the clarification.
__________________
Pylon on the Edmonton Oilers:

"I am actually more excited for the Oilers game tomorrow than the Flames game. I am praying for multiple jersey tosses. The Oilers are my new favourite team for all the wrong reasons. I hate them so much I love them."
IliketoPuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2015, 04:33 PM   #67
JiriHrdina
I believe in the Pony Power
 
JiriHrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Yup you nailed it. It is all about a cap team va budget team
JiriHrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2015, 04:33 PM   #68
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Another thing about this deal...the Leafs get cap relief of Hortons contract, but that does not kick in until the season begins....meaning they cannot use that space until training camps etc are all done and although they can exceed the limit by 10% through the summer, they must be compliant before the season starts...which would have to include that 6 million tag.

At least this is how i understand it.

So if the Leafs want to use that space...they cant do so until the regular season is underway when all the UFA's and whatnot have long been signed elsewhere.

Anyone else want to confirm or dispute this? Cause the deal makes no sense for TO imo if this is still the rule.

Last edited by transplant99; 02-26-2015 at 04:36 PM.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2015, 04:34 PM   #69
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

That was a serious pimp trade for Nonnis. Mad props to him.

It's mad accountin skillz that make trades like this possible.

I'm jealous. They dumped a bad contract for a ltir player.

Stajan + Raymond for Horton and a pick or prospect would have been sweet.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2015, 04:34 PM   #70
OzSome
Franchise Player
 
OzSome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Maybe leaving Toronto might help Clarkson. He is still an overpaid player though but at least he won't be scrutinized by media as much in Columbus compare to Toronto. I agree Columbus just wanting to pay someone who can play rather than paying Horton for not playing as he is not insured.
OzSome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2015, 04:34 PM   #71
lazypucker
First Line Centre
 
lazypucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

I thought the league has banned trading of injured players...
lazypucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2015, 04:35 PM   #72
united
#1 Goaltender
 
united's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
why would Columbus do this
What don't you understand?
Toronto, who has piles of money, gains cap space.
Columbus now pays for someone who can at least skate as opposed to a player who is essentially retired.
__________________
"I think the eye test is still good, but analytics can sure give you confirmation: what you see...is that what you really believe?"
Scotty Bowman, 0 NHL games played
united is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2015, 04:36 PM   #73
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
Another thing about this deal...the Leafs get cap relief of Hortons contract, but that does not kick in until the season begins....meaning they cannot use that space until training camps etc are all done and although they can eceed the limit by 10% through the summer, they must be compliant before the season starts...which would have to include that 6 million tag.

At least this is how i understand it.

So if the Leafs want to use that space...they cant do so until the regular season is underway when all the UFA's and whatnot have long been signed elsewhere.

Anyone else want to confirm or dispute this? Cause the deal makes no sense for TO imo if this is still the rule.
It does if they are trading Phil Dion and Joffrey for picks and prospects this week and at the draft.

Last edited by Badgers Nose; 02-26-2015 at 04:38 PM.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2015, 04:36 PM   #74
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
They still have to pay Clarkson $5.25 million every year.

And really, Clarkson isn't much of an NHLer.
A cardboard cutout of Nathan Horton is better than David Clarkson.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2015, 04:37 PM   #75
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

CLB as a mid/small market team really couldn't afford to pay Horton to not pay. Also, stupid not to insure the contract.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2015, 04:37 PM   #76
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
That doesn't make this any less confusing.

Flames looking at moving out Raymond and Stajan to make room to take on Horton? If true we are a very strange org.
Both have been and will continue to be pushed down the roster by younger players pushing their way up. If you can move those guys out and get something for them, then you do it.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2015, 04:37 PM   #77
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
A cardboard cutout of Nathan Horton is better than David Clarkson.
Any player that can put on skates is better than Nathan Horton right now.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2015, 04:37 PM   #78
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

So obviously Calgary wasn't going to trade the Jackets a "Clarkson" in exchange for Horton's contract because we don't have a deal that atrocious........I wonder what BT was looking at getting in return for taking Horton's contract?

If it was something really sweet, then go **** yourself Nonis.

He's the idiot that signed that Clarkson deal.....was hoping he'd choke on it all the way to the unemployment line cause that's what he deserves for dishing out that kind of deal for middle six player. Instead he uses it to potentially steal an asset from the Flames.

Last edited by Roof-Daddy; 02-26-2015 at 04:41 PM.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2015, 04:38 PM   #79
Anduril
Franchise Player
 
Anduril's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Toronto should get full marks for managing to take advantage of their money as an organization in order to get risk of Clarkson and all of his caphit. Both players' contracts expire in 2020. Could you imagine paying Clarkson for that long when they're already pretty close to the cap? I'm sure they'll end up overpaying for some other UFA.

Seemed like Columbus would rather hold onto whatever asset and pay a warm body who can take the ice instead of getting actual NHL players.
Anduril is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2015, 04:38 PM   #80
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by united View Post
What don't you understand?
Toronto, who has piles of money, gains cap space.
Columbus now pays for someone who can at least skate as opposed to a player who is essentially retired.
Uh, save your condescending posts for those who deserve it.

Posted before that information became clear.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:41 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy