Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-20-2019, 04:54 PM   #6801
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
I mean we've all been there, The Flames haven't exactly been aspiring over the years and there's been plenty of apathy here right?
The biggest difference is that Oilers fans drink that Kool Aid down every year and most of them seem honestly bewildered at how their team can still be bad. Like, how can this be? KLown and Mac-T know a thing or two about winning, we have won several draft lotteries, and we have McJesus. Let's see... KLown and Mac-T also seem to know a thing or two about losing and never earned their positions. Winning several draft lotteries just proves a culture of losing and tanking exists. McJesus's cap hit means that there is little room for error down the rest of the line-up. Oh, and Edmonton it probably the #1 place most players do not want to play in.

It shouldn't be such a surprise to them that they suck again, but at the start of every season they expect a miracle turnaround. When the Flames were mired in mediocrity, most fans were always acutely aware of the shortcomings and not buying any Kool Aid.

Next year is going to be exactly the same thing again and likely until at least McDavid leaves and the team starts another rebuild.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 01-20-2019, 05:01 PM   #6802
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Just saw a tsn clip. Edmonton reporters repeatedly asking McDavid about the refs, basically begging him to complain about them to validate thier own pathetic keyboard opinions.

To his credit, McDavid answers correctly and doesn't take the bait.

https://www.tsn.ca/nhl/video/mcdavid...-media~1591173

Last edited by browna; 01-20-2019 at 05:04 PM.
browna is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 05:04 PM   #6803
Jbo
NOT a cool kid
 
Jbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The Edmonton media should take a page from the coach. Seriously, Hitchcock gave a great answer when asked about McDavid on After Hours. Those tweets from Edmonton media are pathetic.
Jbo is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 05:39 PM   #6804
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

And despite being pretty decisively beat last night, the delusion lives to see another day in NoGood land.

Quote:
dssource

Man that flames team is infuriating. How does tkatcuk not get a penalty for purposely falling on kosk in the first? I liked how Koskinen put his blocker on Tkachuks face to get up in the 2nd or 3rd period Koskinen with some stellar saves throughout especially the one on his back Save of the year potential for sure.

Refs just weren't calling things properly all night. Drai gets a diving penalty on the same cross check that Lucic gave Johnny crybaby, yet the baby gets nothing. Jp's interference call was absolute bs. At a critical point of the game.#

Jones cost us at least 2 goals last night. Flames 4th goal was what ended our comeback. Shame as the play was completely unnecessary.

Oilers didn't do anything well. They didn't hit well, play D well, play O well. Yet we were still in that game until the last 5 minutes, and with no contributions from the top line. I don't fear that flames team at all and I look forward to beating them in the 1st round of the playoffs.#

On to the next.
In truth I think we know the Flames would be licking their chops to land the oilers in round one with that depth matchup.
djsFlames is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 05:40 PM   #6805
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

I love watching the oilers fail. It will be glorious when the day finally comes where McDavid requests a trade. The more I think about it... the more likely it feels like McDavid is at most 1 year away from requesting a trade. If that comes out, the oilers will have to move him and I’m sure there’s no clear way for them to “win” the trade. Rather I’d speculate on the kind of feasible trade they could make. That means picking the right partner.

To me, here are some features of a possible trade partner for the oilers to trade McDavid:

1. Has to be an eastern team - oilers management won’t want to face the shame more than twice a season that they traded their generational lottery ticket.

2. Preferably to a team with a quieter fan/media following - This serves two purposes. First, I think these kinds of teams would be desperate to get a player of McDavid’s name and excitement value and would be willing to pay the price. Teams that need to get buts in the seats will do anything for McDavid. Even more important that building a winning team. The second reason is that management won’t want to trade him to a team like Philadelphia or New York that gets lots of media attention that would throw that stardom in the face of the oilers upon acquiring McDavid.

3. The team that trades for McDavid needs to be rich is assets that are NHL-ready but not yet a competitive team. This means a team that, like the oilers, has drafted high for years and has lots of young talent but can never make it the rest of the way.

4. The owner/management of this team that wants to acquire McDavid has to be willing to take a terrible cap dump with it... probably lucic. This is mainly because the oilers need to be able to get at least two NHL impact players back from the trade partner while also getting cap relief. McDavid + Lucic cap is about $18.5 million I believe. Let’s assume the combined cap hit of the two impact players going back to the oilers is $14 million. The goal for the oilers has to be to follow the mild of teams like Vegas, Calgary, Nashville, etc... to create a team deep with skill rather than having skill concentrated in only 2 players.

These criteria helps narrow down possible destinations for McDavid if these guidelines are accurate... teams like Carolina and Florida come to mind first.

Carolina has a wild card owner/manager that probably would do anything to get McDavid. The problem is that they don’t have much for impact players to trade. By here goes:

To Carolina:

McDavid + Lucic

To Edmonton:

Aho, Slavin, Teravainen, Svechnikov
Top 3 prospects,
3 first round picks (not lottery protected)


And here’s an attempt at a trade with Florida who have much more in terms of NHL-impact assets:

To Florida:

McDavid + Lucic

To Edmonton:

Barkov + Ekblad
Top 2 prospects
2 first round picks

Am I way off-base with these kind of trades? I really don’t know TBH. I know Edmonton will never pull off a good trade and they’ll turn anything they get into garbage anyways because E=NG.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stemit14 is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 05:44 PM   #6806
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

The team with the best assets for a McDavid trade imo is the Avs. Jost, Makar, Sens 1st, Barrie and even Rantanen/Landeskog could all be pieces on the table. They would have McDavid and MacKinnon and easily have room to build around them.
Vinny01 is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 05:47 PM   #6807
the2bears
Franchise Player
 
the2bears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
Exp:
Default

^ You can't add Lucic to the deal and still expect to get all that back in my opinion.
the2bears is offline  
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to the2bears For This Useful Post:
Old 01-20-2019, 05:52 PM   #6808
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

10 players for McDavid? Six players for McDavid? AND eating Lucic's salary? That's hilarious. Contract limits and a salary cap make those types of deals impossible.
Lanny_McDonald is offline  
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 01-20-2019, 05:56 PM   #6809
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default Edmonton is No Good VI: Chia•den•freu•de

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
...4. The owner/management of this team that wants to acquire McDavid has to be willing to take a terrible cap dump with it... probably lucic. This is mainly because the oilers need to be able to get at least two NHL impact players back from the trade partner while also getting cap relief. McDavid + Lucic cap is about $18.5 million I believe. Let’s assume the combined cap hit of the two impact players going back to the oilers is $14 million. The goal for the oilers has to be to follow the mild of teams like Vegas, Calgary, Nashville, etc... to create a team deep with skill rather than having skill concentrated in only 2 players...

Am I way off-base with these kind of trades? I really don’t know TBH. I know Edmonton will never pull off a good trade and they’ll turn anything they get into garbage anyways because E=NG.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don’t think there is any chance in hell that a team adding McDavid would ever concede to including Lucic. It will be difficult enough for a team to juggle the roster adequately to be able to take on McDollar’s $12.5 m cap hit. And then to add another $6.0 m of dead cap space? It will never happen.

Also, a team that trades for McDavid will need deep pockets. Both Carolina and Florida are budget teams. They are not in any position to take on the highest paid player in the world.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 06:26 PM   #6810
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Yeah if I have to add to McDavid's contract by adding Lucic and his contract, then I am getting a serious discount on McDavid.


Plus if Edmonton is trading McDavid its for a new rebuild and they're going to want a ton of entry level contracts and first round picks. If I have to do that to get McDavid and have to take Lucic, then take any first round picks out of the package.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 06:31 PM   #6811
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
I don’t think there is any chance in hell that a team adding McDavid would ever concede to including Lucic. It will be difficult enough for a team to juggle the roster adequately to be able to take on McDollar’s $12.5 m cap hit. And then to add another $6.0 m of dead cap space? It will never happen.

Also, a team that trades for McDavid will need deep pockets. Both Carolina and Florida are budget teams. They are not in any position to take on the highest paid player in the world.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


It’s true that the Lucic contract is likely too immovable even when tacked onto McDavid. I think GMs for budget teams like Carolina and Florida would try to convince their owners that acquiring McDavid is a way to get more buts in the seats. Plus the salary could likely be a wash if they traded their top 2 players.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stemit14 is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 06:33 PM   #6812
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

LMAO the founder bringing the heat on twitter!

https://twitter.com/user/status/1087097279117324288

And in response:

https://twitter.com/user/status/1087106347932430336
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 06:59 PM   #6813
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

A senior member of HF Oilers gets it



__________________
Dion is offline  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Dion For This Useful Post:
Old 01-20-2019, 07:29 PM   #6814
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nage Waza View Post
Just searched for some Kassian fight vids. All I could find were shots of him punching people in the face with his gloves on, trying to fight smaller non fighters or getting into an actual fight, and never landing a punch.

He is really no good.
He got dropped by Ryan Lomberg. Not exactly a heavyweight
PeteMoss is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to PeteMoss For This Useful Post:
Old 01-20-2019, 07:34 PM   #6815
zamler
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Phoenix Coyotes are 1 point behind the Oil same # of games played.
zamler is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to zamler For This Useful Post:
Old 01-20-2019, 07:37 PM   #6816
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion View Post
A senior member of HF Oilers gets it
This is a good point.

It seems like hit totals are negatively corrected with team success.

San Jose, Toronto, Nashville and Calgary are 4 of 5 bottom teams in the "hit" category. They seem to be doing okay.

I wouldn't be surprised if size was already negatively correlated with team success.
Tampa has a lot of small forwards (but their defensemen are huge).

Edmonton lacks scoring depth because they have too many low-skill grinders. I hope they keep it that way.
1qqaaz is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 08:10 PM   #6817
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
He got dropped by Ryan Lomberg. Not exactly a heavyweight
NSFW!
]
Didn't he get smoked by Tanner Glass?
GioforPM is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 08:28 PM   #6818
-TC-
Franchise Player
 
-TC-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Glastonbury
Exp:
Default

this weeks twitter drumbeat will be.....

- how soon until McDavid requests a trade? -
__________________
TC

-TC- is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 09:00 PM   #6819
dirk diggler
First Line Centre
 
dirk diggler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

5-1 Canes over Oilers in the 2nd. man those refs sure pick on the Oilers, that is really the only reason a team with that talent can lose.
dirk diggler is offline  
Old 01-20-2019, 09:03 PM   #6820
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

HFOil is in full meltdown...

can't say i blame them...Nino seems to be a good pickup for Carolina...see if can be more consistent with the Canes...
oldschoolcalgary is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:20 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy