Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-16-2025, 11:03 AM   #641
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

I actually prefer the NJD package if it could have happened.

Mercer=Rossi
Nemec=Buium (I think Nemec is under-rated but has been very good this year and would thrive with more opportunity)
Silayev>Ohgren
and then you have the 1sts.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2025, 11:08 AM   #642
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

So, essentially a bidding war to drive up the price. And a lot of those teams that were in on Hughes could shift towards Andersson.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2025, 11:08 AM   #643
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Not with those same offers obviously
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2025, 11:09 AM   #644
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
I actually prefer the NJD package if it could have happened.

Mercer=Rossi
Nemec=Buium (I think Nemec is under-rated but has been very good this year and would thrive with more opportunity)
Silayev>Ohgren
and then you have the 1sts.
Yes, but it sounds like NJ was asking for retention. Minnesota didn't need retention.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Not with those same offers obviously
Of course not, but teams like the Canes/Red Wings who couldn't keep up with the other bids could shift towards RA with a lesser offer. NYR as a darkhorse for Andersson, Schneider + 1st + something else wouldn't be a bad deal for us.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2025, 11:10 AM   #645
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

I disagree with Buium=Nemec though. I think Nemec will be a good defenseman for a long time, but Buium has star potential.

I think Rossi+Buium+Öhgren and Mercer+Nemec+Silayev is very close. Probably comes down to preference.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2025, 11:11 AM   #646
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
I actually prefer the NJD package if it could have happened.

Mercer=Rossi
Nemec=Buium (I think Nemec is under-rated but has been very good this year and would thrive with more opportunity)
Silayev>Ohgren
and then you have the 1sts.
Jersey 1st would have been better too. Canucks could not wait to allow the Devils time to try to convince somebody to waive their trade protection. They could have traded Glass and had the Canucks eat 20% of Hughes salary (presumably for another asset) and got the better package.
Aarongavey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2025, 11:12 AM   #647
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
I wasn't serious. I just think it's evidence that Vancouver didn't make some deliberate choice to go only for futures and youth. They actually wanted a similar aged established star. But NJ said no.
Hard to say for sure, the fact that all the rumoured packages were pretty similar (early 20s roster player + recent high pick + recent B prospect + 2026 1st) would suggest that's what they were targeting for the most part. But it could be that they changed course and were originally looking for a straight value swap.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
I actually prefer the NJD package if it could have happened.

Mercer=Rossi
Nemec=Buium (I think Nemec is under-rated but has been very good this year and would thrive with more opportunity)
Silayev>Ohgren
and then you have the 1sts.
Eh, I think Rossi is a bit better than Mercer and Buium is a better prospect at this point than Nemec, meanwhile Ohgren has some built-in value for the Canucks because of his junior days. But you're totally right that the relative value is going to be all the result of some fairly subjective prospect valuation that could easily swing the other way in 6 months.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2025, 11:23 AM   #648
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post
Hard to say for sure, the fact that all the rumoured packages were pretty similar (early 20s roster player + recent high pick + recent B prospect + 2026 1st) would suggest that's what they were targeting for the most part. But it could be that they changed course and were originally looking for a straight value swap.

Eh, I think Rossi is a bit better than Mercer and Buium is a better prospect at this point than Nemec, meanwhile Ohgren has some built-in value for the Canucks because of his junior days. But you're totally right that the relative value is going to be all the result of some fairly subjective prospect valuation that could easily swing the other way in 6 months.
It sounds like the opposite - they started with a value swap and when NJ said no they pivoted to futures.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2025, 11:29 AM   #649
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Yeah that's what I was saying, maybe they explored options for players in a similar age and contract situation first - although other than Hischier there probably weren't too many of those guys that would make sense. Could have gone after Tage Thompson or Joel Eriksson Ek, but that would have been even worse.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2025, 11:33 AM   #650
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post
Yeah that's what I was saying, maybe they explored options for players in a similar age and contract situation first - although other than Hischier there probably weren't too many of those guys that would make sense. Could have gone after Tage Thompson or Joel Eriksson Ek, but that would have been even worse.
That would be a strange way to rebuild.
Aarongavey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2025, 11:39 AM   #651
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

It would be very on brand for ownership there, though... I wouldn't be surprised if those discussions about getting a star player equivalent (not really but you know what I mean) back in trade were earlier in the season, and as they fell down the standings it was easier for ownership to sign on to this path instead.

If so, that should rob any Canucks fan of hope that ownership will stick to a rebuild for long enough to do it properly; once they have a run of good play that looks like they might be in contention for a wild card they'll start trading picks and futures for playoff dates again.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2025, 11:41 AM   #652
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post
Yeah that's what I was saying, maybe they explored options for players in a similar age and contract situation first - although other than Hischier there probably weren't too many of those guys that would make sense. Could have gone after Tage Thompson or Joel Eriksson Ek, but that would have been even worse.
This is why the "Vancouver is so smart compared to Calgary with Tkachuk" discussion isn't very apt. Calgary did have a futures trade they could have made but they went for a swap, and if persented, I bet Vancouver would too. So would a lot of teams who still had the parts Calgary did at the time.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2025, 11:46 AM   #653
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
New Jersey never offered that because they could not move out the requisite salary. Everyone on that roster seems to have NTC or NMC protection.

They should almost trade us Mercer for Coleman at 50% just to free up some cap space.
But that would mean they aren't rebuilding!

/s
__________________
"9 out of 10 concerns are completely unfounded."

"The first thing that goes when you lose your hands, are your fine motor skills."
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to D as in David For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2025, 12:34 PM   #654
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
I actually prefer the NJD package if it could have happened.

Mercer=Rossi
Nemec=Buium (I think Nemec is under-rated but has been very good this year and would thrive with more opportunity)
Silayev>Ohgren
and then you have the 1sts.
Could Kadri + Ras get you that?

Coleman and Ras?

Are NJD brave enough to go for it? Or will this be another meh year for them? I’m guessing the latter.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2025, 12:36 PM   #655
Blaster86
UnModerator
 
Blaster86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post
If so, that should rob any Canucks fan of hope that ownership will stick to a rebuild for long enough to do it properly;

Oh, even if we stay dedicated to it through to the end of this season, it'll be gone in the off-season when UFA season starts.

"We have enough talented youth, lets look at competing"


Same as it ever was.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
Could Kadri + Ras get you that?
No.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
Coleman and Ras?
Also no.
__________________

THANK MR DEMKO
CPHL Ottawa Vancouver
Blaster86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2025, 12:56 PM   #656
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
Could Kadri + Ras get you that?

Coleman and Ras?

Are NJD brave enough to go for it? Or will this be another meh year for them? I’m guessing the latter.
I don't think it's what NJD needs so probably not.
Coleman would probably be the smart add for them.

Coleman for Seamus Casey?
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2025, 12:59 PM   #657
Johnny Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Johnny Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
Could Kadri + Ras get you that?

Coleman and Ras?

Are NJD brave enough to go for it? Or will this be another meh year for them? I’m guessing the latter.
NJ will never go anywhere in the playoffs with 1st shot Mark or 50 year old Jake Allen. They need a new goalie!
__________________
Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
Johnny Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2025, 01:07 PM   #658
ripTDR
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Exp:
Default

I don't think it factored in the deal, but I remember Hughes getting pretty knocked around and targeted in the Nash and Edm series to the point where he was struggling to be the difference maker. Will be interesting if it happens again
ripTDR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:08 PM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy