Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-24-2024, 02:18 PM   #601
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

Cause everyone knows Nancy Reagan can suck a golf ball through a garden hose, makes it more credible.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2024, 02:22 PM   #602
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
Yeah, post a quote in the "unpredictable" way that's so predictable after two other people destroyed her book first. Incredible.

Markstrom and Huberdeau will be great for the Flames. You fail.
Still not an example of ad populum. If you want to use the fancy phrases, get them right.

It's just an example of piling on. Sorry if it hurt your feelings.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2024, 02:24 PM   #603
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Trumps current VP called him "Hitler" a few years back
his previous VP won't endorse or vote for him

Forget democrats they can't even find republicans that actually like the guy or think he is qualified. The only ones that support him do so for political gain. If he loses (when) they will all bail and distance themselves like anyone else who has had anything to do with him ever.

The only people who actually support Trump are the brainwashed cult members. There is no debate to be had here.
__________________
GFG

Last edited by dino7c; 07-24-2024 at 02:28 PM.
dino7c is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2024, 02:26 PM   #604
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Wait, so lefties are just straight up lying and making things up? And they can get away with it? Blatant unfounded lies about a persons past? Someone should tell the Republicans to try this strategy out.
They had such success with the Noem dog killing story.

Oh wait, that was true???
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 07-24-2024, 02:27 PM   #605
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Still not an example of ad populum. If you want to use the fancy phrases, get them right.

It's just an example of piling on. Sorry if it hurt your feelings.
What's fancy about ad populum? It's one of the most common appeals. "Other people believe this, so here it is!"
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2024, 02:31 PM   #606
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
What's fancy about ad populum? It's one of the most common appeals. "Other people believe this, so here it is!"
You are planning on voting for Trump and his VP who himself called Trump Hitler? (before it was advantageous to kiss his orange ass) Is this correct?
__________________
GFG
dino7c is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2024, 02:33 PM   #607
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
If he loses (when) they will all bail and distance themselves like anyone else who has had anything to do with him ever.

The only people who actually support Trump are the brainwashed cult members. There is no debate to be had here.
You like to bet, right?
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2024, 02:37 PM   #608
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
What's fancy about ad populum? It's one of the most common appeals. "Other people believe this, so here it is!"
That's not even a correct description of ad populum, so it's no wonder you got it wrong.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 07-24-2024, 02:38 PM   #609
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
That's not even a correct description of ad populum, so it's no wonder you got it wrong.
Check your argument textbook and come back.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2024, 02:40 PM   #610
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
Check your argument textbook and come back.
It's "most" or "many" other people. Not just "other people". It's a mass appeal argument. Not "two other people think this".

Get it right.

Ad populum fallacy refers to a claim that something is true simply because that’s what a large number of people believe. In other words, if many people believe something to be true, then it must be true.

https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/ad...h%20a%20friend.

Last edited by GioforPM; 07-24-2024 at 02:44 PM.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2024, 02:41 PM   #611
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
It's "most" or "many" other people. Not just "other people". It's a mass appeal argument. Not "two other people think this".

Get it right.
2 against 0 is "most" or "many". Nitpicky mood today.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2024, 02:42 PM   #612
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Then you edit your post and link to ad hominem of all things.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2024, 02:43 PM   #613
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
2 against 0 is "most" or "many". Nitpicky mood today.
No, still wrong. The comparison is to the public at large. "This is a bestseller so it must be good".

Not "I agree with these two other people".

Again, don't try to use concepts you don't understand.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2024, 02:45 PM   #614
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
Then you edit your post and link to ad hominem of all things.
So the wrong page got linked. Fixed. You are still wrong.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2024, 02:46 PM   #615
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
No, still wrong. The comparison is to the public at large. "This is a bestseller so it must be good".
The ad populum and appeal to authority are really popular among the Ayn Rand folks though.
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2024, 02:50 PM   #616
Bring_Back_Shantz
Franchise Player
 
Bring_Back_Shantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
The ad populum and appeal to authority are really popular among the Ayn Rand folks though.
Well if the Ayn Rand folks like it, then it must be true!
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
<-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
Bring_Back_Shantz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bring_Back_Shantz For This Useful Post:
Old 07-24-2024, 02:50 PM   #617
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
The ad populum and appeal to authority are really popular among the Ayn Rand folks though.
True. But the popularity is limited. Most people outgrow it. I'm also not sure a lot of those who profess to like Rand have actually read complete books. Because they are just bad writing, let alone having weak central theses.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 07-24-2024, 02:53 PM   #618
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
True. But the popularity is limited. Most people outgrow it. I'm also not sure a lot of those who profess to like Rand have actually read complete books. Because they are just bad writing, let alone having weak central theses.
I am a bit embarrassed to admit that I haven't read a page of any of her books. I probably should.

It's popular to discredit them here.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2024, 02:55 PM   #619
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
I am a bit embarrassed to admit that I haven't read a page of any of her books. I probably should.

It's popular to discredit them here.
You could always watch the movies. Then you'd really be going against what's popular.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2024, 02:58 PM   #620
DionTheDman
First Line Centre
 
DionTheDman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Trumps current VP called him "Hitler" a few years back
his previous VP won't endorse or vote for him

Forget democrats they can't even find republicans that actually like the guy or think he is qualified. The only ones that support him do so for political gain. If he loses (when) they will all bail and distance themselves like anyone else who has had anything to do with him ever.

The only people who actually support Trump are the brainwashed cult members. There is no debate to be had here.
And then when his yes-men invariably wake up from their stupor and back away from Trump, he'll call them losers and how they were incompetent from the start. Soooo.... why did you bring them on in the first place?
DionTheDman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DionTheDman For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:10 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy