Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
I've always thought he was guilty, because there is no amount of money in the world worth paying to be considered a child molester. Fair or not, paying off the first family makes him look incredibly guilty. If the counter to that is it would have been cheaper than going to a trial, I ask what is your reputation worth? Because being considered a child molester is the single worst thing you can be considered on planet earth. And when you pay $25 million to make something go away, it's difficult to make the argument "It was cheaper than a trial" when the alternative is "He looks guilty of molesting kids and is paying this off to go away".
|
While he may have been guilty your logic does not lead there. Paying $25 million is equally indicative of him dreading being wrongfully convicted and going to jail. What you said here is merely an interpretation of events and not concrete evidence of anything.
So he was accused of molesting more than one person? Generally more than 50% of the people that experience sexual abuse during adolescence show signs of serious psychological illness later in life.
