Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-27-2009, 12:52 PM   #41
Sliver
evil of fart
 
Sliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoneyGuy View Post
I thanked you because I basically agree with you, although if there is one religion I think deserves all the criticism it gets, it's this one. I'm a Christian and I know my faith is outnumbered here, but I'll say that I can't believe the nonsense that Scientology spews. And that people buy it.
The reason these threads always go the same way isn't necessarily because of the athiests. When I read stuff like this, it makes my head explode.

Christianity is filled with just as much garbage as Scientology (e.g. a virgin giving birth, the earth is just thousands of years old, somebody rising from the dead, and the holy trinity which is totally nonsensical for a monotheistic religion, etc.). Yet here you are saying exactly what all of us say about your religion. W...T...F.
Sliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 01:09 PM   #42
Bring_Back_Shantz
Franchise Player
 
Bring_Back_Shantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
The reason these threads always go the same way isn't necessarily because of the athiests. When I read stuff like this, it makes my head explode.

Christianity is filled with just as much garbage as Scientology (e.g. a virgin giving birth, the earth is just thousands of years old, somebody rising from the dead, and the holy trinity which is totally nonsensical for a monotheistic religion, etc.). Yet here you are saying exactly what all of us say about your religion. W...T...F.
I'm not going to debate your other points, but the one I bolded, is a little silly.

Are the semantics behind "Monotheistic" and the Trinity really that big of a beef for you? Why exactly is arbitrarily assiging strictly defined words to situations where it isn't 100% consistent reasonable grounds to refute something?

This type of thing really annoys me, becauce whenever one of these arguments comes up, both sides make these kinds of statements to disprove the other, and they're all just running in circles looking sounding ignorant.

It's no different than when dumb ass creation science folks, use the word "Theory" where it isn't consistent and use it to support their arguments.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
<-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!

Last edited by Bring_Back_Shantz; 10-27-2009 at 01:13 PM.
Bring_Back_Shantz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 01:14 PM   #43
Sliver
evil of fart
 
Sliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bring_Back_Shantz View Post
I'm not going to debate your other points, but the one I bolded, is a little silly.

Are the semantics behind "Monotheistic" and the Trinity really that big of a beef for you? Why exactly is arbitrarily assiging strictly defined words to situations where it isn't 100% consistent reasonable grounds to refute something?
I suppose semantics is a component of it, but my beef is with the imposibility of this equation: Jesus + God + Holy Ghost = God. It's nonsense.
Sliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 01:16 PM   #44
Weiser Wonder
Franchise Player
 
Weiser Wonder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Moscow, ID
Exp:
Default

This is like a guy gay finally getting out of a reformed straight program. It's nice, but why were you stupid enough to believe it in the first place?
Weiser Wonder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 01:21 PM   #45
Phaneuf3
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HotHotHeat View Post
When I stopped going to church, church going people thought much less of me, and let me know it in very aggressive ways. One person even told me I was ruining my life.
Unless you went to the nuttiest catholic church ever with the nuttiest nutbars every in attendance what you saw as "very aggressive" is absolutely nothing compared to what scientology does. If someone even went as far as tell you you were ruining your life you have absolutely nothing on what people leaving scientology go through. Please educate yourself and/or stop making ridiculous statements.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HotHotHeat View Post
Why do people choose religion as a vehicle to give money to the poor? Can we say one way or the other that religion makes providing for the less fortunate more effective?
Its easy and convenient and well known. The support structure and organization is already in place. In your opinion, it may not be the best way to go about things and on that I would agree with you; but there are certain advantages.



Quote:
Originally Posted by HotHotHeat View Post
As far as differences between Catholicism and scientology, the most obvious one is that the Catholic church is much older. Beyond that, they both have had their share of ridiculousness/irrationality.
You can knock the rationality of the dogma if you want... that's not really what we're discussing. The behavior of the two churchs are wildly different.
Phaneuf3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 01:30 PM   #46
Cowperson
CP Pontiff
 
Cowperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: A pasture out by Millarville
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phaneuf3 View Post
Unless you went to the nuttiest catholic church ever with the nuttiest nutbars every in attendance what you saw as "very aggressive" is absolutely nothing compared to what scientology does. If someone even went as far as tell you you were ruining your life you have absolutely nothing on what people leaving scientology go through. Please educate yourself and/or stop making ridiculous statements.


.
It would be interesting to see what Scientology's version of The Inquisition would look like.

Cowperson
__________________
Dear Lord, help me to be the kind of person my dog thinks I am. - Anonymous
Cowperson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cowperson For This Useful Post:
Old 10-27-2009, 02:34 PM   #47
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bring_Back_Shantz View Post
I'm not going to debate your other points, but the one I bolded, is a little silly.
Why wouldn't you debate all his points?

Quote:
This type of thing really annoys me, becauce whenever one of these arguments comes up, both sides make these kinds of statements to disprove the other, and they're all just running in circles looking sounding ignorant.
Disagree, I have yet to see anyone disprove any statement I could make disproving a christian/religious god. The thumpers jump in with a statement and never back it up. They run away like little kids caught in a lie.

I'm more than ready if anyone wants a debate.
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 03:39 PM   #48
Bring_Back_Shantz
Franchise Player
 
Bring_Back_Shantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T View Post
Why wouldn't you debate all his points?


Disagree, I have yet to see anyone disprove any statement I could make disproving a christian/religious god. The thumpers jump in with a statement and never back it up. They run away like little kids caught in a lie.

I'm more than ready if anyone wants a debate.
I won't debate his other statements because in the context of his post they are perfectly logical points to make.
The problem I had with his other statement was that it's an example of using semantics to debate theology, which is completely self defeating.

To your second point, you completely missed my point. Debating the sematics of "Monotheism" is akin to creationists debating what "Theory" means as if it somehow discredits evolution. If you're debating the exact meaning of a word that you've arbitrarily applied to your opponents position, it's an inherently weak argument.

Now, would it be rude if I pointed out that you come across as being so intent on getting into an anti-religion debate with a "Thumper", that you can't even recognize when someone is pointing out that most of their arguments are logical fallacies? I mean the whole point of my argument was that these sorts of arguments don't prove anything, and you reply with "I disagree, no one has ever proved me wrong"...really...
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
<-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
Bring_Back_Shantz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 03:49 PM   #49
HPLovecraft
Took an arrow to the knee
 
HPLovecraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

You know who are almost as crazy as Scientologists? Those Anonymous guys who wear V masks and protest outside their "churches" all the time. Have any of you ever actually read their pamphlets against Scientology?

Underground slave labour camps?! Really? A private navy?! A secret police force?!
__________________
"An adherent of homeopathy has no brain. They have skull water with the memory of a brain."
HPLovecraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 03:51 PM   #50
HeartsOfFire
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bitter, jaded, cursing the fates.
Exp:
Default

As someone who has donned a Guy Fawkes mask and protested Scientology as Anonymous in 2008, I can confidently tell you that the cult is, for all intents and purposes, dead in Calgary. Though we did have a branch here in the 70's, it's long been defunct for over 30 years. The woman that was running it saw how the cult -- and therefore her by proxy -- was frauding people out of large sums of money preying on their false hope of enlightenment. She came clean, disbanded the Calgary branch, and has gone into hiding ever since.

http://www.lermanet.com/exit/lornalevitt.htm

That being said, there remains a subsidiary of Scientology in Calgary, albeit not a very well known one. It's called NarcAnon.

http://www.narcononcalgary.com/

If you google 'Scientology Calgary' you will get a listing for a church branch, but I've already gone to that address and investigated. It's now a country kitchen diner.
HeartsOfFire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 03:52 PM   #51
HPLovecraft
Took an arrow to the knee
 
HPLovecraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeartsOfFire View Post
As someone who has donned a Guy Fawkes mask and protested Scientology as Anonymous in 2008, I can confidently tell you that the cult is, for all intents and purposes, dead in Calgary. Though we did have a branch here in the 70's, it's long been defunct for over 30 years. The woman that was running it saw how the cult -- and therefore her by proxy -- was frauding people out of large sums of money preying on their false hope of enlightenment. She came clean, disbanded the Calgary branch, and has gone into hiding ever since.

http://www.lermanet.com/exit/lornalevitt.htm

That being said, there remains a subsidiary of Scientology in Calgary, albeit not a very well known one. It's called NarcAnon.

http://www.narcononcalgary.com/

If you google 'Scientology Calgary' you will get a listing for a church branch, but I've already gone to that address and investigated. It's now a country kitchen diner.
Can I ask what's up with the pamphelts Anonymous hands out? Is the whole underground slave labour crap just there to rile up-tight Scientologists up or something? Do people in Anonymous actually believe this?
__________________
"An adherent of homeopathy has no brain. They have skull water with the memory of a brain."
HPLovecraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 04:08 PM   #52
HeartsOfFire
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bitter, jaded, cursing the fates.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPLovecraft View Post
Can I ask what's up with the pamphelts Anonymous hands out? Is the whole underground slave labour crap just there to rile up-tight Scientologists up or something? Do people in Anonymous actually believe this?
No, it's not there to rile up Scientologists. It's there to open the eyes of the general public, because it is absolutely 100% true.

HeartsOfFire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 04:14 PM   #53
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I've never heard of this Anonymous stuff. Do these people actually stand out with Guy Fox masks and protest ala V for Vendetta?
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 04:14 PM   #54
HeartsOfFire
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bitter, jaded, cursing the fates.
Exp:
Default

Also, nicely done on my new custom user title. XD

Quote:
Originally posted by MattyC

I've never heard of this Anonymous stuff. Do these people actually stand out with Guy Fawkes masks and protest ala V for Vendetta?
(fixed spelling)

Forgive me, but due to the distinct lack of Scientology presence in Calgary, I'm not up on Anonymous' recent activities against Scientology. To my knowledge, protests still take place in some locales, but not nearly on the scale that they used to in 2008. But yes, they do usually wear some kind of mask. The Guy Fawkes mask is the mask of choice, given the impact it had in the V for Vendetta story and film, but really, anything that covers your face is preferred. The purpose was to make it exceedingly difficult to identify the people protesting, because Scientology has a nasty history of tracking such people down and making their lives a living hell.

Last edited by HeartsOfFire; 10-27-2009 at 04:25 PM.
HeartsOfFire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 04:16 PM   #55
octothorp
Franchise Player
 
octothorp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
Exp:
Default

Is that brick building down on 14th street SW near the Lougheed House a Scientology building or Christian Science building?

edit: nevermind: tried to find it on google maps and I think the building is gone.

Last edited by octothorp; 10-27-2009 at 04:40 PM.
octothorp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 04:31 PM   #56
HPLovecraft
Took an arrow to the knee
 
HPLovecraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeartsOfFire View Post
No, it's not there to rile up Scientologists. It's there to open the eyes of the general public, because it is absolutely 100% true.

You actually believe Scientologist have underground slave labour camps, have their own private navy, and a secret police force? And this isn't as whacko as the beliefs of Scientologists themselves... how?

I mean, you really think they have UNDERGROUND slave labour camps? The Guy Fawkes masks seem as much flourishing drama as believing they have their own private navy. Or do rich celebrities' yachts count as ships in it?
__________________
"An adherent of homeopathy has no brain. They have skull water with the memory of a brain."
HPLovecraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 04:42 PM   #57
HeartsOfFire
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bitter, jaded, cursing the fates.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPLovecraft View Post
You actually believe Scientologist have underground slave labour camps, have their own private navy, and a secret police force? And this isn't as whacko as the beliefs of Scientologists themselves... how?

I mean, you really think they have UNDERGROUND slave labour camps? The Guy Fawkes masks seem as much flourishing drama as believing they have their own private navy. Or do rich celebrities' yachts count as ships in it?
Underground, no. It's out in the open. Privately owned and not open to the public, but it exists. The Rehabilitation Project Force (RPF)

http://www.watchman.org/sci/scientologycamps.htm

As for the private navy, they USED to have one, back when Hubbard was the head of the cult. Now instead, their private navy and secret police force are one and the same: The Sea Org.

Scientology also owns a Cruise ship. A fully functioning cruise ship, like one of those you take vacations on. They OWN it. Keel to mast. It's called the Freewinds. It's old, though... at least twenty or so. Late last year, Anonymous learned that the Freewinds had an asbestos problem in the walls of the ship, and as such it was forced to stay moored somewhere in Europe until the problem could be fixed. Rather than pay for an asbestos removal crew to take care of it, they got their own volunteers to remove it haphazardly, akin to picking up piles of leaves raked off the front lawn. Scientologists believe themselves impervious to disease, so Asbestos doesn't frighten them.

http://www.lermanet.com/scientology/...ftAsbestos.htm

Last edited by HeartsOfFire; 10-27-2009 at 04:44 PM.
HeartsOfFire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 04:46 PM   #58
HPLovecraft
Took an arrow to the knee
 
HPLovecraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeartsOfFire View Post
Underground, no. It's out in the open. Privately owned and not open to the public, but it exists.

As for the private navy, they USED to have one, back when Hubbard was the head of the cult. Now instead, their private navy and secret police force are one and the same: The Sea Org.

Scientology also owns a Cruise ship. A fully functioning cruise ship, like one of those you take vacations on. They OWN it. Keel to mast. It's called the Freewinds. It's old, though... at least twenty or so. Late last year, Anonymous learned that the Freewinds had an asbestos problem in the walls of the ship, and as such it was forced to stay moored somewhere in Europe until the problem could be fixed. Rather than pay for an asbestos removal crew to take care of it, they got their own volunteers to remove it haphazardly, akin to picking up piles of leaves raked off the front lawn. Scientologists believe themselves impervious to disease, so Asbestos doesn't frighten them.

http://www.lermanet.com/scientology/...ftAsbestos.htm
So let them believe they are impervious to disease... Christian Scientists refuse to take medicine, too. I also heard the Vatican owns a lot of things... Possibly even a cruise ship. Are they not allowed to own a cruise ship? Are they going to become pirates off the coast of Somalia?
__________________
"An adherent of homeopathy has no brain. They have skull water with the memory of a brain."
HPLovecraft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 04:47 PM   #59
4X4
One of the Nine
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by octothorp View Post
Is that brick building down on 14th street SW near the Lougheed House a Scientology building or Christian Science building?

edit: nevermind: tried to find it on google maps and I think the building is gone.

There's a building on 19th st NW that named something to the effect of Christian Science.
4X4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 04:53 PM   #60
HeartsOfFire
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bitter, jaded, cursing the fates.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPLovecraft View Post
So let them believe they are impervious to disease... Christian Scientists refuse to take medicine, too. I also heard the Vatican owns a lot of things... Possibly even a cruise ship. Are they not allowed to own a cruise ship? Are they going to become pirates off the coast of Somalia?
It was in line with the 'private navy' topic. Though I got a bit carried away and went off on a tangent. :P

The founder of Scientology -- Lafayette Ron Hubbard (L. Ron Hubbard, or LRH) -- was a man of the sea and had a career as a naval officer during the second world war. Lots of early activities in Scientology were conducted on the ocean on boats the cult owned. Now, it's just the one big cruise ship.
HeartsOfFire is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:14 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy