Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-07-2006, 04:46 PM   #41
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedMan12
I am pretty sure Japan is not big on nuclear weapons, too. Especially being the only nation to be bombed with atomic weaponary.
Japan is also one of the most technologically advanced countries in the world. I have no doubt that they could suddenly come up with nukes, if push comes to shove.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 04:48 PM   #42
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HelloHockeyFans
Yup. In fact, the majority of people in Taiwan want unification.
Not according to this, scroll down to SUPPORT.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_reunification

"polls consistantly suggest that 70% to 80% of all Taiwanese support maintaining the status quo".

It doesn't take an Einstein to infer that the support for declaring an independent country is influenced by the military threat from the Peoples Republic.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 05:10 PM   #43
RedMan12
#1 Goaltender
 
RedMan12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Japan is also one of the most technologically advanced countries in the world. I have no doubt that they could suddenly come up with nukes, if push comes to shove.
almost any country can come up with Nukes, just takes money. I am saying I don't think Japan would. Proably only way they would is if the USA put pressure on them.
__________________

You lack rawness, you lack passion, you couldn't make it through war without rations.




RedMan12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 05:13 PM   #44
jolinar of malkshor
#1 Goaltender
 
jolinar of malkshor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedMan12
almost any country can come up with Nukes, just takes money. I am saying I don't think Japan would. Proably only way they would is if the USA put pressure on them.
And the US wouldn't because it really isnt in the best interests of other nations to possess such weapons. Its better for the US if less countries have them, regardless if they are their ally or not.
jolinar of malkshor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 08:24 PM   #45
FireFly
Franchise Player
 
FireFly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Actually, the US is pressuring Japan to get more involved in the East, including requesting that they arm themselves with nukes. You have to consider that the US cannot support any prolonged war in the East. You have China, India, and potentially North Korea all having nuclear capabilities in the area, and the US no longer has the military strength to hold off all three. Absolutely they want Japan to have nukes, they just aren't likely to support that idea in public. In this particular case, it's best if Japan does have nukes because they are the only ally of the US in the region.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimbl420 View Post
I can wash my penis without taking my pants off.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
If edmonton wins the cup in the next decade I will buy everyone on CP a bottle of vodka.
FireFly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 08:53 PM   #46
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireFly
You have China, India, and potentially North Korea all having nuclear capabilities in the area, and the US no longer has the military strength to hold off all three.
Don't forget Pakistan... they have nukes too.
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 08:53 PM   #47
jolinar of malkshor
#1 Goaltender
 
jolinar of malkshor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireFly
Actually, the US is pressuring Japan to get more involved in the East, including requesting that they arm themselves with nukes. You have to consider that the US cannot support any prolonged war in the East. You have China, India, and potentially North Korea all having nuclear capabilities in the area, and the US no longer has the military strength to hold off all three. Absolutely they want Japan to have nukes, they just aren't likely to support that idea in public. In this particular case, it's best if Japan does have nukes because they are the only ally of the US in the region.
You have any proof to back that up or are you just privilaged with that information because you present during the joint chiefs meeting?
jolinar of malkshor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 09:01 PM   #48
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jolinar of malkshor
You have any proof to back that up or are you just privilaged with that information because you present during the joint chiefs meeting?
Look it up on google. I'm pretty sure I've read recent articles of the US wanting Japan to expand their military, and eventually aquire nukes.

I think the more countries that have nukes, the less the chance someone will use them.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 09:09 PM   #49
FireFly
Franchise Player
 
FireFly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Well, I did write a paper on it 6 months ago. Japan has been rearming since the end of WWII. They have been discussing nuclear weapons since 2004. It's on the agenda. I'd look for the articles, but when I finished school, I deleted all the links. Sorry.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimbl420 View Post
I can wash my penis without taking my pants off.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
If edmonton wins the cup in the next decade I will buy everyone on CP a bottle of vodka.
FireFly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2006, 02:37 AM   #50
jolinar of malkshor
#1 Goaltender
 
jolinar of malkshor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Look it up on google. I'm pretty sure I've read recent articles of the US wanting Japan to expand their military, and eventually aquire nukes.

I think the more countries that have nukes, the less the chance someone will use them.
You want me to research a claim that you made? OK
jolinar of malkshor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2006, 02:38 AM   #51
jolinar of malkshor
#1 Goaltender
 
jolinar of malkshor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireFly
Well, I did write a paper on it 6 months ago. Japan has been rearming since the end of WWII. They have been discussing nuclear weapons since 2004. It's on the agenda. I'd look for the articles, but when I finished school, I deleted all the links. Sorry.
How convenient.
jolinar of malkshor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2006, 02:39 AM   #52
jolinar of malkshor
#1 Goaltender
 
jolinar of malkshor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Look it up on google. I'm pretty sure I've read recent articles of the US wanting Japan to expand their military, and eventually aquire nukes.

I think the more countries that have nukes, the less the chance someone will use them.
Oh that makes lots of sense. The more countries that have nukes the less likely they will use them. WOW. Ok why dont we let everyone in Canada have a handgun because with your logic the more people that have hand guns the less chance they will be used. Nice
jolinar of malkshor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2006, 07:44 AM   #53
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jolinar of malkshor
Oh that makes lots of sense. The more countries that have nukes the less likely they will use them. WOW. Ok why dont we let everyone in Canada have a handgun because with your logic the more people that have hand guns the less chance they will be used. Nice
Are handguns a good comparison?

You ever heard of MAD? I'm not advocating that everyone in the world should have nukes, but I sure as hell wouldn't have a problem if Japan got them.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2006, 07:55 AM   #54
White Doors
Lifetime Suspension
 
White Doors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Are handguns a good comparison?

You ever heard of MAD? I'm not advocating that everyone in the world should have nukes, but I sure as hell wouldn't have a problem if Japan got them.
I agree 100%. Japan with nukes would not increase the chances of a nuclear exchange by any means.
In any SE asia scenairio, India would also be an ally of the west. India and China don't get along very well. That's why the US is supporting India's re-armament and growth. The world seems focused on China, while India will soon surpass it in terms of military strength/technology and total population.
White Doors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2006, 10:50 AM   #55
FireFly
Franchise Player
 
FireFly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jolinar of malkshor
How convenient.
Actually, it wasn't convenient, it was a lot of research and a lot of hard work. Feel free to continue believing what you wish though, I'm sure thinking the US doesn't want anyone else armed will help you sleep at night, but it won't make it any less real.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimbl420 View Post
I can wash my penis without taking my pants off.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
If edmonton wins the cup in the next decade I will buy everyone on CP a bottle of vodka.
FireFly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2006, 12:08 PM   #56
jolinar of malkshor
#1 Goaltender
 
jolinar of malkshor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Doors
I agree 100%. Japan with nukes would not increase the chances of a nuclear exchange by any means.
In any SE asia scenairio, India would also be an ally of the west. India and China don't get along very well. That's why the US is supporting India's re-armament and growth. The world seems focused on China, while India will soon surpass it in terms of military strength/technology and total population.
Ok lets arm Japan with nukes and start a show down with Japan and China. Makes lots of sense. If they have them, they are MORE likely to use them if they don't, duh. Doing this does nothing but put these to countries into the same sitiuation USA and Cuba where in. By keeping the nukes out of there and limited to very few nations you dont have to worry about itchy fingers. If China new Japan was in possession of nukes and some paranoid commie defence minister thought they were going to attack, China would use their nukes as a pre-emtive stike.

I agree with you that Japan can be trusted with nukes but all that would do is raise the tentions in the region. Not to mention the crazy neighbor N. Korea.
jolinar of malkshor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2006, 12:22 PM   #57
White Doors
Lifetime Suspension
 
White Doors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jolinar of malkshor
Ok lets arm Japan with nukes and start a show down with Japan and China. Makes lots of sense. If they have them, they are MORE likely to use them if they don't, duh. Doing this does nothing but put these to countries into the same sitiuation USA and Cuba where in. By keeping the nukes out of there and limited to very few nations you dont have to worry about itchy fingers. If China new Japan was in possession of nukes and some paranoid commie defence minister thought they were going to attack, China would use their nukes as a pre-emtive stike.

I agree with you that Japan can be trusted with nukes but all that would do is raise the tentions in the region. Not to mention the crazy neighbor N. Korea.
You don't think Japan having a nuclear capabilty would make China think twice? You are missing a piece of the equation here, China already has them. If japan has them as well, it makes it even less likely that China will use theirs.

Duh!
White Doors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2006, 02:38 PM   #58
RedMan12
#1 Goaltender
 
RedMan12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Doors
You don't think Japan having a nuclear capabilty would make China think twice? You are missing a piece of the equation here, China already has them. If japan has them as well, it makes it even less likely that China will use theirs.

Duh!
I still doubt Japan will ever get nuclear weapons. Lets just blow up all the world with nukes. Alls it takes is one country to start a chain reaction, thats why I doubt any country is going to launch nukes at anyone.
__________________

You lack rawness, you lack passion, you couldn't make it through war without rations.




RedMan12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2006, 02:54 PM   #59
jolinar of malkshor
#1 Goaltender
 
jolinar of malkshor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Doors
You don't think Japan having a nuclear capabilty would make China think twice? You are missing a piece of the equation here, China already has them. If japan has them as well, it makes it even less likely that China will use theirs.

Duh!
You missing the equation. China is MORE liekly to use them if they feel they are threatend to the point that they could be wiped out. That is not possible at the moment.

You need to think things over a bit before you start ramblin on about stuff you no nothing about.
jolinar of malkshor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2006, 03:26 PM   #60
Agamemnon
#1 Goaltender
 
Agamemnon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
You need to think things over a bit before you start ramblin on about stuff you no nothing about.
Is there a mirror around your place?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jolinar of malkshor
You missing the equation. China is MORE liekly to use them if they feel they are threatend to the point that they could be wiped out. That is not possible at the moment.
No, China is MORE likely to use them if none/few of their neighbours have them. They are LESS likely to use them if the country their about to be aggressive upon has their own nuclear weapons.

I'm not advocating that every country obtain nuclear weapons; obviously it would be best if no country had them. But, realisitically, if China faces an opposing regional power with nuclear weapons, it is bound to step far more carefully than if it has nuclear supremacy over all regions south/east of them.

I don't get why you think that IF China's competitors in the region had nukes THEN China would certainly use them? This makes no sense...
Agamemnon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:59 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy