Quote:
Originally Posted by Rutuu
This comment needs it's own thread.
It's something I've felt as well. We've all heard the "build down the middle"..."build from the net out"..."defense wins championships"...
The most popular "what are the flames doing wrong" conclusion is we don't have enough top talent, so we have to tank for a few years to get it.
Personally I feel we concentrate too much on Defence and not enough on offence up front and we undervalue 2nd - 4th round picks, spending them on "depth".
|
Most of the playoff teams have a common theme, which is at least two elite forwards with some teams having more
Boston - Pastrnak, Marchand, Bergeron
Toronto - Matthews, Marner, Tavares, Nylander
Tampa - Kucherov, Point, Stamkos
Florida - Tkachuk, Barkov
Rangers - Panarin, Zibanajed
Devils - Hughes, Hischier, Bratt
Edmonton - McDavid, Draisaitl, Nugent Hopkins (this year)
LA - Fiala, Kopitar
Colorado - MacKinnon, Rantanen
Dallas - Robertson, Pavelski, Benn
You need offensive game breakers. The NHL is a 4-3 league, finding the offensive game breakers over time has to be the goal. Vegas and Carolina are arguably the only elite teams that do not have at least one if not a couple superstars capable of approaching 100 points on their roster.
The idea that you build out from the backend is a little antiquated for today’s NHL. Ideally you would have one stud back there, but having a solid 3 pairings is nowhere near as important as having those game breakers up front.
Agree on not valuing picks overall. Would much prefer an approach where they try to hit offensive home runs in the 2nd-4th rounds rather than trading them away.