11-11-2015, 04:47 PM
|
#42
|
Not a casual user
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
|
The Liberals are such hypocrites. They complain about Albertas dirty oil and yet they allow all this raw sewage to get dumped into the St, Lawrence.
__________________
|
|
|
11-11-2015, 04:55 PM
|
#43
|
God of Hating Twitter
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion
The Liberals are such hypocrites. They complain about Albertas dirty oil and yet they allow all this raw sewage to get dumped into the St, Lawrence.
|
You did not read anything above?
__________________
Allskonar fyrir Aumingja!!
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Thor For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-11-2015, 05:12 PM
|
#44
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
I did read it. You think she's unfit to lead because a previous colleague (who later wrote as the lead on the expedition himself as he wanted) and his daughter didn't like how she dressed or how she was "emotional"?
Her questionable belief was shared and still is by many others. We can play this charade with any given candidate.
Despite the National Post unsurprising attempt at a smear job, Trudeau chose a scientist who had led many projects, and was part of a Nobel Prize winning organization on Climate change.
Again, she's very qualified and far more than many, many previous ministers. Remember when Harper appointed a creationist chiropractor? Was your outrage so strong?
|
Is geography even 'real' science? Isn't it more humanities/arts - so a social science?
|
|
|
11-11-2015, 05:13 PM
|
#45
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce
Is geography even 'real' science? Isn't it more humanities/arts - so a social science?
|
Medical geography. She also teaches climate science
|
|
|
11-11-2015, 05:16 PM
|
#46
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion
The Liberals are such hypocrites. They complain about Albertas dirty oil and yet they allow all this raw sewage to get dumped into the St, Lawrence.
|
What is the impact of this raw sewage being dumped into the St larwance on a temporary basis?
its sounds like you are saying poop is icky it must be bad.
|
|
|
11-11-2015, 06:02 PM
|
#47
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce
Is geography even 'real' science? Isn't it more humanities/arts - so a social science?
|
As a Geographer, I feel I better clear that up for you. Some aspects of Geography are absolutely humanities based, and you can get a BA in Geography, though it still does require "real" science. Many people get a B.Sc. in Geography that requires plenty of real science courses. It is a very diverse field. Even those with a BA in Geography have far more experience with scientific method than humanities/arts.
It's one of the reasons Geography gets shuffled around so much, it is hard to pigeonhole. It involves statistics, computer science, earth science/geology, engineering, humanities, and math.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-11-2015, 08:16 PM
|
#48
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor
Well,
1. We have a Science minister finally, yay!
2. Harper did everything to muzzle and direct science to be beneficial to business and muzzle those who would challenge it.
3. http://scienceblogs.com/confessions/...al-indictment/
We have come out of a dark age in government science. The gag orders, the cutting and promoting "business science" has been a long list of a frankly scary approach by the previous government. A Republican approach if you will on science, silence, unfund, promote business people in science positions...
Of all the things people criticize the PC government for, the crap that has happened against science policy in Canada and the environment is so damning even Nature covered it, which is not exactly a partisan magazine.
|
This is just typical leftist rhetoric - much in the same way you decree Harper's policies "the Republican approach." Cutting the long-form census, being tough on drugs, and muzzling scientists to the extent he did was certainly not right, but slashing government industries, and ensuring the health of the Canadian economy were two things he was repeatedly voted into power to do, and two things he did rather well.
Having a Science Minister is something I think most people would agree with. However, at a time when scientists are rejoicing that the "war on science" is over, we've got a leading neurologist quipping that "This is the most curious appointment since Caligula named his horse as consul" when he has every reason to be overjoyed.
Further, the science minister enters the fray with fears from her peers that she will exert “top down” political pressure on the scientific community" and that the new minister is "closed-minded to cutting-edge work from outsiders" isn't exactly heart warming. Especially when one takes it in conjunction with her stubbornness to deviate from her position on MS treatment despite there being strong evidence to suggest her theory is wrong.
I understand she's not even settled into her chair yet with her title, and that she deserves time. That's fair. However, it is equally as troubling to me that we could go from having a government that wouldn't listen to science at all, to a government only willing to listen to science that it agrees with.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Dagger For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-11-2015, 10:37 PM
|
#49
|
Monster Storm
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
As a Geographer, I feel I better clear that up for you. Some aspects of Geography are absolutely humanities based, and you can get a BA in Geography, though it still does require "real" science. Many people get a B.Sc. in Geography that requires plenty of real science courses. It is a very diverse field. Even those with a BA in Geography have far more experience with scientific method than humanities/arts.
It's one of the reasons Geography gets shuffled around so much, it is hard to pigeonhole. It involves statistics, computer science, earth science/geology, engineering, humanities, and math.
|
Thank you for fielding that one fellow Geographer.
__________________
Shameless self promotion
|
|
|
11-12-2015, 01:13 AM
|
#50
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Barnet - North London
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T
Nope, they poop but don't fart.
|
You're ####ting me, right?
|
|
|
11-12-2015, 01:44 AM
|
#51
|
Not a casual user
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
|
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Dion For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-12-2015, 07:11 AM
|
#52
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: St John's
Exp:  
|
Anyone remember the Halifax bubble that was only fixed a few years ago? I'm surprised at the outrage, here in St John's we still pump raw sewage directly into the harbour. The city opened up a water treatment plant last year but it still only treats %50 of what is entering the Atlantic. No one here seems to give a damn.
|
|
|
11-12-2015, 07:20 AM
|
#53
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by surferguy
Thank you for fielding that one fellow Geographer.
|
Thought you'd appreciate that
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-12-2015, 08:22 AM
|
#54
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerriffic
Anyone remember the Halifax bubble that was only fixed a few years ago? I'm surprised at the outrage, here in St John's we still pump raw sewage directly into the harbour. The city opened up a water treatment plant last year but it still only treats %50 of what is entering the Atlantic. No one here seems to give a damn.
|
The outrage has everything to do with the government change. The new government ran on an environmental platform and some people (looking at you National Post) want to use it to criticize the new government. Never mind the fact that the new government has been in power less than 2 weeks and inherited this problem and that they made the city implement mitigation measures that weren't in place before they took power.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-12-2015, 08:45 AM
|
#55
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
|
To me it seems like dumping sewage into water is a bad idea, but I have zero factual information to back up other than I certainly don't want to be in a swimming pool with someone taking a dump. However, I wonder if there is any other factors in play, like does the ecosystem somehow absorb a portion of the sewage (do fish eat poop?  ).
Just random ramblings about something I know little about.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
|
|
|
11-12-2015, 08:46 AM
|
#56
|
First Line Centre
|
From time to time Montreal releases billions of litres of sewage into the St. Lawrence. The public complains about the impact of the human sewage mixing with beluga feces because it is gross to them. The cities downstream see no impact on their drinking water. No long term effects pop up.
Then we start the cycle again several years down the road.
Guys, if this were a legitimate environmental issue, you would not have the green party's solution be 'just hold off for two months and do it in the winter'.
|
|
|
11-12-2015, 08:55 AM
|
#57
|
Looooooooooooooch
|
Montreal to Begin Dumping Untreated Sewage into the St. Lawrence
The relative volumes of the sewage versus the river makes the pollution effects negligible.
Same reason as to why the small amounts of mercury in vaccines are harmless.
It's all about dilution and the ppm of the toxin.
Last edited by Looch City; 11-12-2015 at 08:59 AM.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Looch City For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-12-2015, 09:28 AM
|
#58
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion
|
You a big supporter of this Chris Leahey fellow Dion?
More examples of Mr. Leahey's opinions from his Twitter feed.
https://mobile.twitter.com/ChrisLeah...58469468897281
https://mobile.twitter.com/ChrisLeah...41278957813761
A man is judged by the company he keeps Dion. This guy, who you support by posting his tweet, is a xenophobic hate monger.
I know you're not.
Don't get so caught up in the partisanship that you carelessly mis-state who you are and what you stand for.
I made that mistake here once. In my haste to win a point in an Israel-Palestine thread, I carelessly posted a link from what turned out to be a obviously anti-Semetic website to support my case. I got called on it (and rightfully so), felt embarrassed as hell and knew I'd tarnished what precious little reputation I had as a poster. I still regret it today.
Last edited by longsuffering; 11-12-2015 at 09:40 AM.
Reason: Added context
|
|
|
11-12-2015, 10:07 AM
|
#59
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor
Man I've never seen Canada so partisan since near and after this election. I really hope we are not going the way of the states. My friends back in Calgary are constantly blasting anything they can and blaming the Liberals.
|
The economy is down so people are looking for someone to blame. It's the NDP's fault that so and so lost their job, not the low price of Oil. It's Trudeau's fault that Alberta's future looks bleak, not our inability to prepare for busts during boom times.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-12-2015, 11:34 AM
|
#60
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iggy City
The relative volumes of the sewage versus the river makes the pollution effects negligible.
Same reason as to why the small amounts of mercury in vaccines are harmless.
It's all about dilution and the ppm of the toxin.
|
I agree the volume it self makes it negligible, but that sounds awfully similar to the early climate change naysayers. It is the culminate effect of all things that needs to be looks at. Right now, sure it may not appear to effect much but dumping anything into the ocean just seems like a bad idea.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:26 PM.
|
|