Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-11-2015, 04:23 PM   #41
Thor
God of Hating Twitter
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

But really, what matters most is this

https://images.plurk.com/eW1zZJI5X.gif
__________________
Allskonar fyrir Aumingja!!
Thor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2015, 04:47 PM   #42
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

The Liberals are such hypocrites. They complain about Albertas dirty oil and yet they allow all this raw sewage to get dumped into the St, Lawrence.
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2015, 04:55 PM   #43
Thor
God of Hating Twitter
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion View Post
The Liberals are such hypocrites. They complain about Albertas dirty oil and yet they allow all this raw sewage to get dumped into the St, Lawrence.
You did not read anything above?
__________________
Allskonar fyrir Aumingja!!
Thor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Thor For This Useful Post:
Old 11-11-2015, 05:12 PM   #44
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
I did read it. You think she's unfit to lead because a previous colleague (who later wrote as the lead on the expedition himself as he wanted) and his daughter didn't like how she dressed or how she was "emotional"?

Her questionable belief was shared and still is by many others. We can play this charade with any given candidate.

Despite the National Post unsurprising attempt at a smear job, Trudeau chose a scientist who had led many projects, and was part of a Nobel Prize winning organization on Climate change.



Again, she's very qualified and far more than many, many previous ministers. Remember when Harper appointed a creationist chiropractor? Was your outrage so strong?
Is geography even 'real' science? Isn't it more humanities/arts - so a social science?
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2015, 05:13 PM   #45
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
Is geography even 'real' science? Isn't it more humanities/arts - so a social science?
Medical geography. She also teaches climate science
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2015, 05:16 PM   #46
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion View Post
The Liberals are such hypocrites. They complain about Albertas dirty oil and yet they allow all this raw sewage to get dumped into the St, Lawrence.
What is the impact of this raw sewage being dumped into the St larwance on a temporary basis?

its sounds like you are saying poop is icky it must be bad.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2015, 06:02 PM   #47
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
Is geography even 'real' science? Isn't it more humanities/arts - so a social science?
As a Geographer, I feel I better clear that up for you. Some aspects of Geography are absolutely humanities based, and you can get a BA in Geography, though it still does require "real" science. Many people get a B.Sc. in Geography that requires plenty of real science courses. It is a very diverse field. Even those with a BA in Geography have far more experience with scientific method than humanities/arts.

It's one of the reasons Geography gets shuffled around so much, it is hard to pigeonhole. It involves statistics, computer science, earth science/geology, engineering, humanities, and math.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
Old 11-11-2015, 08:16 PM   #48
Dagger
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
Well,

1. We have a Science minister finally, yay!
2. Harper did everything to muzzle and direct science to be beneficial to business and muzzle those who would challenge it.
3. http://scienceblogs.com/confessions/...al-indictment/

We have come out of a dark age in government science. The gag orders, the cutting and promoting "business science" has been a long list of a frankly scary approach by the previous government. A Republican approach if you will on science, silence, unfund, promote business people in science positions...

Of all the things people criticize the PC government for, the crap that has happened against science policy in Canada and the environment is so damning even Nature covered it, which is not exactly a partisan magazine.
This is just typical leftist rhetoric - much in the same way you decree Harper's policies "the Republican approach." Cutting the long-form census, being tough on drugs, and muzzling scientists to the extent he did was certainly not right, but slashing government industries, and ensuring the health of the Canadian economy were two things he was repeatedly voted into power to do, and two things he did rather well.

Having a Science Minister is something I think most people would agree with. However, at a time when scientists are rejoicing that the "war on science" is over, we've got a leading neurologist quipping that "This is the most curious appointment since Caligula named his horse as consul" when he has every reason to be overjoyed.

Further, the science minister enters the fray with fears from her peers that she will exert “top down” political pressure on the scientific community" and that the new minister is "closed-minded to cutting-edge work from outsiders" isn't exactly heart warming. Especially when one takes it in conjunction with her stubbornness to deviate from her position on MS treatment despite there being strong evidence to suggest her theory is wrong.

I understand she's not even settled into her chair yet with her title, and that she deserves time. That's fair. However, it is equally as troubling to me that we could go from having a government that wouldn't listen to science at all, to a government only willing to listen to science that it agrees with.
Dagger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dagger For This Useful Post:
Old 11-11-2015, 10:37 PM   #49
surferguy
Monster Storm
 
surferguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
As a Geographer, I feel I better clear that up for you. Some aspects of Geography are absolutely humanities based, and you can get a BA in Geography, though it still does require "real" science. Many people get a B.Sc. in Geography that requires plenty of real science courses. It is a very diverse field. Even those with a BA in Geography have far more experience with scientific method than humanities/arts.

It's one of the reasons Geography gets shuffled around so much, it is hard to pigeonhole. It involves statistics, computer science, earth science/geology, engineering, humanities, and math.

Thank you for fielding that one fellow Geographer.
__________________
Shameless self promotion

surferguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2015, 01:13 AM   #50
Barnet Flame
Franchise Player
 
Barnet Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Barnet - North London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T View Post
Nope, they poop but don't fart.
You're ####ting me, right?
Barnet Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2015, 01:44 AM   #51
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

@ChrisLeahey1 Montreal Mayor #DennisCoderreYou are truly a disgrace #montrealsewage pic.twitter.com/CPuyP0a7Cs

8:30 PM - 11 Nov 2015
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dion For This Useful Post:
Old 11-12-2015, 07:11 AM   #52
kerriffic
Backup Goalie
 
kerriffic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: St John's
Exp:
Default

Anyone remember the Halifax bubble that was only fixed a few years ago? I'm surprised at the outrage, here in St John's we still pump raw sewage directly into the harbour. The city opened up a water treatment plant last year but it still only treats %50 of what is entering the Atlantic. No one here seems to give a damn.
kerriffic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2015, 07:20 AM   #53
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by surferguy View Post
Thank you for fielding that one fellow Geographer.
Thought you'd appreciate that
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
Old 11-12-2015, 08:22 AM   #54
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kerriffic View Post
Anyone remember the Halifax bubble that was only fixed a few years ago? I'm surprised at the outrage, here in St John's we still pump raw sewage directly into the harbour. The city opened up a water treatment plant last year but it still only treats %50 of what is entering the Atlantic. No one here seems to give a damn.
The outrage has everything to do with the government change. The new government ran on an environmental platform and some people (looking at you National Post) want to use it to criticize the new government. Never mind the fact that the new government has been in power less than 2 weeks and inherited this problem and that they made the city implement mitigation measures that weren't in place before they took power.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 11-12-2015, 08:45 AM   #55
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

To me it seems like dumping sewage into water is a bad idea, but I have zero factual information to back up other than I certainly don't want to be in a swimming pool with someone taking a dump. However, I wonder if there is any other factors in play, like does the ecosystem somehow absorb a portion of the sewage (do fish eat poop? ).

Just random ramblings about something I know little about.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2015, 08:46 AM   #56
starseed
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

From time to time Montreal releases billions of litres of sewage into the St. Lawrence. The public complains about the impact of the human sewage mixing with beluga feces because it is gross to them. The cities downstream see no impact on their drinking water. No long term effects pop up.

Then we start the cycle again several years down the road.

Guys, if this were a legitimate environmental issue, you would not have the green party's solution be 'just hold off for two months and do it in the winter'.
starseed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2015, 08:55 AM   #57
Looch City
Looooooooooooooch
 
Looch City's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default Montreal to Begin Dumping Untreated Sewage into the St. Lawrence

The relative volumes of the sewage versus the river makes the pollution effects negligible.

Same reason as to why the small amounts of mercury in vaccines are harmless.

It's all about dilution and the ppm of the toxin.

Last edited by Looch City; 11-12-2015 at 08:59 AM.
Looch City is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Looch City For This Useful Post:
Old 11-12-2015, 09:28 AM   #58
longsuffering
First Line Centre
 
longsuffering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion View Post
You a big supporter of this Chris Leahey fellow Dion?

More examples of Mr. Leahey's opinions from his Twitter feed.

https://mobile.twitter.com/ChrisLeah...58469468897281

https://mobile.twitter.com/ChrisLeah...41278957813761

A man is judged by the company he keeps Dion. This guy, who you support by posting his tweet, is a xenophobic hate monger.

I know you're not.

Don't get so caught up in the partisanship that you carelessly mis-state who you are and what you stand for.

I made that mistake here once. In my haste to win a point in an Israel-Palestine thread, I carelessly posted a link from what turned out to be a obviously anti-Semetic website to support my case. I got called on it (and rightfully so), felt embarrassed as hell and knew I'd tarnished what precious little reputation I had as a poster. I still regret it today.

Last edited by longsuffering; 11-12-2015 at 09:40 AM. Reason: Added context
longsuffering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2015, 10:07 AM   #59
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
Man I've never seen Canada so partisan since near and after this election. I really hope we are not going the way of the states. My friends back in Calgary are constantly blasting anything they can and blaming the Liberals.
The economy is down so people are looking for someone to blame. It's the NDP's fault that so and so lost their job, not the low price of Oil. It's Trudeau's fault that Alberta's future looks bleak, not our inability to prepare for busts during boom times.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
Old 11-12-2015, 11:34 AM   #60
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iggy City View Post
The relative volumes of the sewage versus the river makes the pollution effects negligible.

Same reason as to why the small amounts of mercury in vaccines are harmless.

It's all about dilution and the ppm of the toxin.
I agree the volume it self makes it negligible, but that sounds awfully similar to the early climate change naysayers. It is the culminate effect of all things that needs to be looks at. Right now, sure it may not appear to effect much but dumping anything into the ocean just seems like a bad idea.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:51 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy