Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-24-2015, 12:17 PM   #41
Tyler
Franchise Player
 
Tyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Cookin View Post
The NHL should keep Quebec City in its back pocket for relocation.
That's exactly what is happening. Quebec City is the heavy girl you know loves you that you can always go back to after you're done trying to woo the hot chicks (Vegas and Seattle)
Tyler is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Tyler For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2015, 12:18 PM   #42
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Your attachment to Shantz is disturbing.
I like seeing these old usernames from the young guns days. "I Hate Hulse" is another favourite of mine.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to saillias For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2015, 12:25 PM   #43
Reaper
Franchise Player
 
Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I'm right behind you
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
Ugh. The watering down of the NHL continues.
Not really.

Some scouts and hockey pundits think there are 300-400 top NHL aged players in the world at any given time. Most of them play in the NHL already. From there there are 2000-2500 players who are either already playing in the NHL or haven't yet due to circumstance, opportunity, family, chances, etc. These players are generally interchangeable. Results may vary based on chemistry and coaching.

At this point, adding two more NHL teams would be the equivalent of letting a half a cup of ice melt in a 7-11 Double Gulp Cup. Slight decrease in syrup (talent) to water (NHL players). Barely noticeable and it depends on how much syrup each franchise is adding to the fountain (NHL gameplay). I could go on and on but now I'm really thirsty.
__________________
Don't fear me. Trust me.
Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Reaper For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2015, 12:30 PM   #44
OutOfTheCube
Franchise Player
 
OutOfTheCube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

This is cool! The last time they expanded I was 11 years old, not really following or caring about hockey. Will be neat to see some new teams for the first time!
OutOfTheCube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 12:31 PM   #45
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Maybe 32 teams allows for four conferences of eight teams.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2015, 12:34 PM   #46
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Saskatoon welcomes its new NHL franchise.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 12:35 PM   #47
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

What is being watered down - a team's chances of winning the Cup.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 12:38 PM   #48
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

I for one, look forward to pages of discussion on whether Mark Jankowski should be protected in the upcoming expansion draft.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 12:40 PM   #49
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kavvy View Post
This is so dumb with Phoenix struggling...

Ensure all of your markets are at least semi-healthy prior to taking on expansion teams.
Not advocating Arizona to stay, but why are they always the ones that get talked about to be the first ones to move? The Florida Panthers are just as bad if not worse.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 12:44 PM   #50
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
Not advocating Arizona to stay, but why are they always the ones that get talked about to be the first ones to move? The Florida Panthers are just as bad if not worse.
The Panthers have a lease that is not subject to litigation, for starters.
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 12:46 PM   #51
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Cookin View Post
The Panthers have a lease that is not subject to litigation, for starters.
Even prior to the lease fiasco. The Florida Panthers are never talked about.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 12:50 PM   #52
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler View Post
That's exactly what is happening. Quebec City is the heavy girl you know loves you that you can always go back to after you're done trying to woo the hot chicks (Vegas and Seattle)
Plus, QC is a good negotiating tool for teams to get public support. Having a realistic city in their back pocket that team can relocate to overnight is great for the owners.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2015, 12:53 PM   #53
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

What's ever happened to Kansas City? Don't they have a state of the art facility just Dying to be used up by a full time tenant?

Around here in Victoria, there's some real enthusiasm for a Seattle team and to Jump ship from Vancouver.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 12:56 PM   #54
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
What's ever happened to Kansas City? Don't they have a state of the art facility just Dying to be used up by a full time tenant?
There are no potential owners in KC.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 12:57 PM   #55
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Is there a potential owner for a team in Wisconsin?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 01:00 PM   #56
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
You wanted to increase scoring, there you go.
Expansion in the past has decreased scoring. Talent is diluted and coaches are forced to play a more defensive game.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 01:11 PM   #57
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Diluting the talent pool might be a bit of a concern but I think at the same time you offer more opportunity for players to break out. How many star players are really on each team anyways? The majority of players that make up a team are your middle of the pack or bottom 6 type guys. It is a consideration but I don't think it would really be that big of a deal. There is quite good parity around the league and I don't see that changing much with a couple extra teams. In the long run anyways.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 01:12 PM   #58
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I think that's the only way Quebec could get a team as they aren't a big enough market to be able to afford the expansion fees. I personally don't believe it's a big enough market for a team but they could probably do better than Phoenix.
Quebecor - the company rumoured to be the ownership group is worth 3.9 billion dollars. They could afford if they want to.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 01:16 PM   #59
northcrunk
#1 Goaltender
 
northcrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

If Saskatoon ever gets a NHL team do they name them the Roughriders?
northcrunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2015, 02:20 PM   #60
MissTeeks
Franchise Player
 
MissTeeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Andy Strickland@andystrickland6m6 minutes ago

Kansas City remains very interested in becoming an #NHL city, told relocation is more likely than expansion.
__________________
The Quest stands upon the edge of a knife. Stray but a little, and it will fail, to the ruin of all. Yet hope remains while the Company is true. Go Flames Go!

Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.
MissTeeks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:23 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy