Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-09-2014, 11:21 AM   #41
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
It's expected to go up, but that doesn't mean it will. It was expected to be quite a bit higher than $69M this year and look how that went.
Yes and no. The truth of the matter is that I sincerely doubt that we will ever see the Salary Cap go down, it just wont increase as much.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 11:21 AM   #42
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

The Hawks have done and continue to do a great job finding good talent in the draft despite not picking in prime position. So as long as they can keep doing that they'll be alright in terms of turning over their roster with cheaper young players who can provide good production when they have to lose a few guys.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 11:22 AM   #43
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
It's expected to go up, but that doesn't mean it will. It was expected to be quite a bit higher than $69M this year and look how that went.
Are there any concrete numbers yet in regard to what the new Rodgers TV deal will mean to the cap, notwithstanding any other factors to make it rise or fall?
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 11:24 AM   #44
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
Its not a terrible problem to have. Hell, if they could have made it past LA they'd likely have torn NYR apart as well and won it a third time.

LA and CHI are establishing Western Conference Dynasties at the moment.
True dat.

If I were their GM I would be torn between going for one more long playoff run with the supporting cast they have or re-tooling now with an eye to the future. Trading Hossa or Sharp would bring in some interesting (cheaper) pieces for their future.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 11:24 AM   #45
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

The Hawks might be feeling the hurt during the last couple of years on these contracts but the players won't be too old at the end.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 11:26 AM   #46
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
Are there any concrete numbers yet in regard to what the new Rodgers TV deal will mean to the cap, notwithstanding any other factors to make it rise or fall?

I believe the Rogers contract was structured so the payout to the NHL goes up every year of the deal. So that should cause the cap to go up in a more reasonable fashion instead of one huge leap the first year of the deal.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fire For This Useful Post:
Old 07-09-2014, 11:29 AM   #47
Arya Stark
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
I believe the Rogers contract was structured so the payout to the NHL goes up every year of the deal. So that should cause the cap to go up in a more reasonable fashion instead of one huge leap the first year of the deal.
The TV deal has zero impact on the season coming up. The TV deal will have an impact on the 2015-16 season and beyond.
Arya Stark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 11:30 AM   #48
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arya Stark View Post
The TV deal has zero impact on the season coming up. The TV deal will have an impact on the 2015-16 season and beyond.
Which is the same time frame as these contracts
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 11:35 AM   #49
TheyCallMeBruce
Likes Cartoons
 
TheyCallMeBruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

Wow, they have 3 mil to sign a least 6 players next year. Unless the cap goes up a lot.
TheyCallMeBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 11:47 AM   #50
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Wow, payday. I was predicting 9.5M each, some people thought that was too high.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 11:50 AM   #51
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Hawks will have to hope that the Cap goes up and stays up for the next 9 years or they will have major issues keeping around a supporting cast that's going to be good enough to keep the overall team cup competitive. I must say this is kind of worrysome that we are seeing 10+ million deals at a $70 million cap as agents are going to use this as the bar for solid 2-way players that chip in offence but don't finish top 10 in scoring like Teows.

Last edited by Erick Estrada; 07-09-2014 at 11:52 AM.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 11:54 AM   #52
Derek Sutton
First Line Centre
 
Derek Sutton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sunnyvale
Exp:
Default

Originally thought they were going to be royally screwed, I still take they are. If they trade one of Hossa or Sharp and Versteeg they will not be too bad up front, but still with some bad contracts in Bickell and Shaw to a lesser extent. Saad will be up for a huge raise. On the back end, Oduya and Rozsival are not earning their money and they will be both be coming off but they will still need to sign 3 D next year. I have said it before and still believe that Seabrook could be moved, would be a great pick up for any team though.

These two will be nearly 2x the AAV Keith is, he does have one of those old front end load contracts though.
__________________
The only thing better then a glass of beer is tea with Ms McGill

Last edited by Derek Sutton; 07-09-2014 at 12:18 PM.
Derek Sutton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 11:56 AM   #53
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
What if cap goes down? I know it doesn't look like it now but its like everyone in calgary real estate just assuming their property values will just keep going up and it ends up doing just that.
The Canadian dollar dropping significantly would drop the cap a good amount.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 11:59 AM   #54
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
The Canadian dollar dropping significantly would drop the cap a good amount.
The dollar dropped significantly this year and the cap still went up, just not as much as initially expected.
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 12:12 PM   #55
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
Wow. 25% of their cap space on two players.

Aside from rolling in more and more dough, I wonder if these players know, or even care, that they severely handicapped the rest of their team in term of acquiring talent to fill out out a 23-man roster.
I think this is such a load of crap personally. These guys are the difference makers on that team, and without them the Hawks aren't winning anything. If the team is well managed they will be able to surround them with enough other guys. Let Brad Richards take the pay cut to play with legitmate star players, rather than Kane and Toews taking paycuts so Johnny Oduya can be a 4.5 million dollar a year 4-5 defenceman.

All those guys in Detroit who took hometown discounts after the 08 season....how has that worked out? I'm happy to see star players actually get paid more in line with what they're worth rather than taking less so Tuomo Ruutu's and Dennis Wideman can make 5 million.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Sylvanfan For This Useful Post:
Old 07-09-2014, 12:16 PM   #56
Oil Stain
Franchise Player
 
Oil Stain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
Wow. 25% of their cap space on two players.

Aside from rolling in more and more dough, I wonder if these players know, or even care, that they severely handicapped the rest of their team in term of acquiring talent to fill out out a 23-man roster.
I think the league's stars area already pretty underpaid relative to their contributions to their teams and the league as a whole.

Why should Kane and Toews leave money on the table so that guys like Erhoff and Richards can get bought out of $50 million dollar contracts?

When guys like Orpik are making 5+ a season and every third line winger is getting $4 million this offseason, we shouldn't ask the top guys to take much less then they are worth.
Oil Stain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 12:17 PM   #57
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Hawks are going to need to keep drafting well.

They've got $58 million in cap space tied in up in 9 guys next year (Toews, Kane, Sharp, Hossa, Bickell, Keith, Seabrook, Hjarmlsson and Crawford)
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 12:17 PM   #58
gunnner
Crash and Bang Winger
 
gunnner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Amsterdam
Exp:
Default

Those who claim Kane should be making less than Toews need to watch more playoff hockey. They both deserve those numbers, and contribute differently but equally to that teams success.
gunnner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to gunnner For This Useful Post:
Old 07-09-2014, 12:24 PM   #59
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Saad and Leddy are offer sheet targets next summer.

Not saying the Flames should do it, but they will be targets.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 12:27 PM   #60
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

That's it for Chicago till 2020 after this year
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:34 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy