Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Top Flames Prospect Left on the List?
Agostino 45 20.18%
Arnold 4 1.79%
Berra 1 0.45%
Billins 0 0%
Bouma 1 0.45%
Breen 6 2.69%
Brossoit 4 1.79%
Culkin 0 0%
Cundari 11 4.93%
Deblouw 0 0%
Eddy 0 0%
Elson 0 0%
Ferland 1 0.45%
Gilmour 0 0%
Gordon 0 0%
Granlund 47 21.08%
Hanowski 2 0.90%
Harrison 0 0%
Horak 55 24.66%
Howse 0 0%
Jooris 0 0%
Kanzig 2 0.90%
Kulak 0 0%
Martin 0 0%
Nemisz 0 0%
Ortio 0 0%
Rafikov 1 0.45%
Ramage 6 2.69%
Ramo 8 3.59%
Reinhart 29 13.00%
Roy 0 0%
Voters: 223. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-12-2013, 11:39 AM   #41
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Of the players left I firmly believe that Agostino, Arnold, Granlund, Harrison, Horak, Ramage and Reinhart will be NHLers in the near future. If that promise is attained with the Flames is another story. I think the best of the bunch is still Reinhart, but it is very close. Really like Granlund, Agostino, And Ramage as future Flames. Horak needs to establish himself in a position this year or he's going to be surpassed in short order by a guy like Arnold. Harrison is a long term player that I think takes over on the 4th line makes a guy like Bouma or Ferland expendable in three or four years. Nice to be able say this type of stuff as all of these kids have potential to play I the NHL.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 11:50 AM   #42
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Granlund should have been taken before Poirier and Klim but nonetheless should absolutely be taken here. Agostino is close. Horak shouldn't count, imo.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 12:29 PM   #43
kehatch
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
It was due to the lockout sure, but then when Flames camp opened he made the team, played two games and was dispatched when camp injuries cleaned up.

He then played four games in February and was sent down again until the Flames cleaned house and went with youth.

That's hardly an established NHL season and the reason I still consider him a prospect.
Except he played 61 games the season before. Some might have removed him as a prospect then. Do you then add him back to the prospect list the following season because he played less games? Makes more sense to me to have a specific number of games total rather then a percentage played of a season.

But like I said, everyone has their definitions. He doesn't meet the traditional definitions though (HF, NHL, HN, etc).
kehatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 12:30 PM   #44
tempz
Backup Goalie
 
tempz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Exp:
Default

Went with Agostino here. Only because I personally have a hard time qualifying someone with 81 games in the NHL (Horak) as a prospect still. I feel like Agostino is still a relative unknown amongst our fanbase and he has a huge upside IMO.

Also just went through some of the other polls and noticed I voted for Jooris in round 1?? I have no idea how that happened.
tempz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 01:31 PM   #45
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
Went Reinhart again. We are down to the 2b/3a ceiling players. A center that plays a complete 200' game is worth more in trade value. Could have made a case for Horak but i think the flames see him as a winger.
Conroy's interviews make it sound like they would have preferred Horak was played at centre last year in the Abby. It sounds like they actually think he's more of a centre.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 01:37 PM   #46
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kehatch View Post
Except he played 61 games the season before. Some might have removed him as a prospect then. Do you then add him back to the prospect list the following season because he played less games? Makes more sense to me to have a specific number of games total rather then a percentage played of a season.

But like I said, everyone has their definitions. He doesn't meet the traditional definitions though (HF, NHL, HN, etc).
But looking at games played doesn't tell you the circumstances around those games. His first season he was sent down later in the year. Which indicated he hadn't established himself as a full time NHLer yet. It is a different situation from starting the season in the minors and then playing the last 61 games of the season. Had he done that and then stayed up for most of this year then he'd definitely be graduated. This past season he didn't really establish himself as a full time NHLer either. Both he and Baertschi were up and down all year. Both are still prospects IMO until they finally stick for good.

I think he'll establish himself as a full time NHLer this upcoming season.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 02:19 PM   #47
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Wow, close race with 4 votes separating Horak, Agostino and Granlund.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 02:28 PM   #48
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Granlund! Should be ahead of both agostino and horak. Playing well in the Finnish elite league should give him the slight edge. I like horak but like many others here I just do not see him as a prospect anymore. Agostino is good and should right fully be top fifteen but not ahead of granlund.

I also have a sneaking suspicion that markusay end up being a more productive nhler than his brother. In a huselius kind of way.
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 02:43 PM   #49
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kehatch View Post
Except he played 61 games the season before. Some might have removed him as a prospect then. Do you then add him back to the prospect list the following season because he played less games? Makes more sense to me to have a specific number of games total rather then a percentage played of a season.

But like I said, everyone has their definitions. He doesn't meet the traditional definitions though (HF, NHL, HN, etc).
I think a guy is a prospect until he sticks with the NHL club no questions asked, or becomes a suspect and is no longer in the plans of the team at all.

One is a negative, one a positive, and Horak is stuck between the two to date which I think makes him a prospect. That is evidenced by his step backwards last year by not making the team out of camp for more than two games

Add in the fact that he's not a guy aged 32 that I'm trying to make a case for, and still on his entry level contract and I have him a prospect.

Just my view though.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 08-12-2013, 02:45 PM   #50
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
Wow, close race with 4 votes separating Horak, Agostino and Granlund.
I'm tempted to halt this poll and launch a round 11 run off with the three players in question right now
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 08-12-2013, 02:45 PM   #51
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Think a re-vote is needed with just Horak, Granlund, and Agostino.

Too close to pick one of those 3 as a definitive winner.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 03:40 PM   #52
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

At least nobody is picking Nemisz anymore.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 03:42 PM   #53
Itse
Franchise Player
 
Itse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Think a re-vote is needed with just Horak, Granlund, and Agostino.

Too close to pick one of those 3 as a definitive winner.
I don't think the exact order between 12-14 is that important.
Itse is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 03:47 PM   #54
the_only_turek_fan
Lifetime Suspension
 
the_only_turek_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

[QUOTE=Bingo;4357752]I think a guy is a prospect until he sticks with the NHL club no questions asked, or becomes a suspect and is no longer in the plans of the team at all.

/QUOTE]

I can't see any circumstance that Baertschi gets sent down this October.

I think he is a full time NHL player now.
the_only_turek_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 04:00 PM   #55
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan View Post
I can't see any circumstance that Baertschi gets sent down this October.

I think he is a full time NHL player now.
Agreed. But he still fits the prospect definition until then. We did vote him the #2 prospect. And Horak is in a similar situation. Very likely to make the Flames full time and never see the minors again.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 08-12-2013, 04:22 PM   #56
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
I think a guy is a prospect until he sticks with the NHL club no questions asked, or becomes a suspect and is no longer in the plans of the team at all.
I can't see any circumstance that Baertschi gets sent down this October.

I think he is a full time NHL player now.
He's 20 years old and only got 25 career GP. Definitely a prospect still, no question.
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 04:49 PM   #57
cral12
First Line Centre
 
cral12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Flames Fan View Post
Still Granlund for me. He's got the potential to be a 2nd line material.
Like others have said, went with Granlund. The amount of pro games played by Horak takes him out of contention for me. Still some great kids left on the board!
__________________
Founder: Upside Hockey & Trail Lynx; Upside on Bluesky & Instagram & Substack; Author of Raised by Rocks, Moved by Mountains
cral12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 04:55 PM   #58
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Went with Horak due to his previous experience and solid start to his AHL season last year. He is arguably not a prospect but still going to development camp and on his elc so I think he does still count
Vinny01 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 05:49 PM   #59
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Closed for a run off
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:28 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy