Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-18-2013, 08:13 AM   #41
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

It's tempting, but be careful with a scorched earth policy. Didn't work so well up north.
It is still important to have players across the age and experience spectrum. The Flames are hurting for the guys in their prime (25-29 or so). Gio is certainly tradeable with a good return, but I wouldn't want an entire team of youngsters without any leadership or experienced veterans to lend guidance. Gio is likely more valulable to the Flames than any other franchise.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 08:37 AM   #42
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

I must be in some parallel universe where Giordano is worth the 5th overall.

:Baghead:
Tinordi is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tinordi For This Useful Post:
Old 06-18-2013, 08:38 AM   #43
Rubicant
First Line Centre
 
Rubicant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Peterborough, ON
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug View Post
It's tempting, but be careful with a scorched earth policy. Didn't work so well up north.
It is still important to have players across the age and experience spectrum. The Flames are hurting for the guys in their prime (25-29 or so). Gio is certainly tradeable with a good return, but I wouldn't want an entire team of youngsters without any leadership or experienced veterans to lend guidance. Gio is likely more valulable to the Flames than any other franchise.
I think the problem with the Oilers is the overall way their team is constructed, not necessarily their demographics.

Very poor defence and mediocre goaltending can't be masked by having two small, skilled top lines.
Rubicant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 08:38 AM   #44
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

With the way this draft and especially the first 5 picks being hyped as franchise changers Gio doesn't have enough value to get a top 5 pick.

Your looking at a Gio +++ like Bart to get the deal done.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 08:46 AM   #45
Imported_Aussie
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

More likely Buffalo is a trade partner for Carolina here - offering Tyler Myers. Myers is a young, potentially high upside D who looks like a change of scenery may help restore his offensive production and defensive play.
Imported_Aussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 09:35 AM   #46
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Myers has too big of a contract. Plus, we're getting him!
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 03:14 PM   #47
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan View Post
Looking at it from a Canes perspective I still fail to see how that's a smart move for them.
It might not be, but it fits what they are reported to be looking for.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 03:21 PM   #48
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

If Carolina puts the 5th pick up for auction to all the teams in the NHL, does anyone really think they wouldn't get an offer better than Gio + the 22nd? In a draft where the 5th pick is the equivalent of the 2nd/3rd in a lot of drafts?

Gio would be the throw-in in any deal for the 5th pick, not the main piece.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 03:37 PM   #49
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
If Carolina puts the 5th pick up for auction to all the teams in the NHL, does anyone really think they wouldn't get an offer better than Gio + the 22nd? In a draft where the 5th pick is the equivalent of the 2nd/3rd in a lot of drafts?

Gio would be the throw-in in any deal for the 5th pick, not the main piece.
We can add and add and add if we wanted to. Gaudreau, Glencross (if willing to explore trade), Stempniak (cost efficient 20 goal scorer at 2.5 for a year has some value in a package deal IMO). The Flames would be in the thick of it for sure if they really wanted to.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 03:40 PM   #50
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug View Post
It's tempting, but be careful with a scorched earth policy. Didn't work so well up north.
It is still important to have players across the age and experience spectrum. The Flames are hurting for the guys in their prime (25-29 or so). Gio is certainly tradeable with a good return, but I wouldn't want an entire team of youngsters without any leadership or experienced veterans to lend guidance. Gio is likely more valulable to the Flames than any other franchise.
^ this should really be stressed a bit more around here.

I understand that some people are worried that keeping Tanguay could hurt the future of the organization because some of his "attitude problems" could rub off on the young guys.

Personally, I am more concerned about having a team with so few veterans that the identity of the team is driven by the young kids and they have no one to set a good example for them. Giordano definitely has value to the Flames because he provides that leadership that should help mold our players for the better of the team's future.

I would like to think that Giordano is worth the #5 pick. Partially because I think he is a high value player on a reasonable contract and partially because most people agree that the first talent drop off in the draft is at #5 which makes the pick worth significantly less than a 1-4 pick.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 03:49 PM   #51
puckedoff
First Line Centre
 
puckedoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

We really don't have the assets unless the 6th overall is involved and at that point is it really worth it to move one spot?
puckedoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 04:10 PM   #52
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puckedoff View Post
We really don't have the assets unless the 6th overall is involved and at that point is it really worth it to move one spot?
Short answer: no.

Long answer: if the Russian somehow gets selected in the top 4 then one of the big names will drop to 5. Then it would be worthwhile to move up but I am really not sure if the gap between Monahan versus Barkov is really that big. I certainly wouldn't make a big offer for that move.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 04:33 PM   #53
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
I would like to think that Giordano is worth the #5 pick. Partially because I think he is a high value player on a reasonable contract and partially because most people agree that the first talent drop off in the draft is at #5 which makes the pick worth significantly less than a 1-4 pick.
It's a small drop off, not a jump into the Grand Canyon. That #5 pick is still very valuable.

Gio turns 30 this season, and his cap is just over 4 million, it's not like it's a steal of a deal. He was darn near terrible for most of last season.

If you were a Canes fan would you be happy with that return?
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 04:34 PM   #54
korzym12
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Camalleri has to pull-off a Bouwmeester with his play this year, it's better to see if his value could get raised..then get rid of him at the deadline.
korzym12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 04:49 PM   #55
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
We can add and add and add if we wanted to. Gaudreau, Glencross (if willing to explore trade), Stempniak (cost efficient 20 goal scorer at 2.5 for a year has some value in a package deal IMO). The Flames would be in the thick of it for sure if they really wanted to.
Sure. And they would be trading Brodie + a first + more in that situation. They could get a Stempniak equivalent for less than this, and I doubt the Flames even consider trading Glencross - a guy who wants to be here and looks to be the go-to scorer next season - for much less than a package that sees MacKinnon coming our way.

If you want to speculate about the Flames drafting top five in this draft, any deal that does not involve us giving up the 6th pick, plus Brodie or Baertschi + more is not realistic.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 04:50 PM   #56
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IgiTang View Post
This team is 3 to 4 years from being competitive.

Do you recall 3 years ago, many people cryin for Flames management to start the rebuild? Asking to trade Iginla while his stock is the highest?

Now, we have a 30 yo top 4 defender who is at his prime, coming off a sub-par year but with a decent contract and still able to elevate his game. Has many tools in his tool-box, so to speak.

Losing Gio is not going to make this club worse than they are already projected to be. 30th.

Why on earth would we hold onto Gio? Why would we not move him for another 1st round pick if possible? Chance to use him with another piece (not backlund or our skilled youth) to trade into the top 5?

Thats a no brainer. Hes going to be 33 or 34 before the Flames are in a position to compete, at best.

Get what we can for our older assets, thats the point right? Rebuild?
yeah, but most of the posts aren't saying to keep Gio; rather they are saying that there is no way that Gio or Gio + 22nd pick gets you the 5th pick.

I agree that trading Gio should be something that is looked at. The problem is that he had such a poor year last year, so his value is diminished...
oldschoolcalgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:11 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy