03-04-2013, 01:02 PM
|
#41
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Moscow
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
Read it in the Sun yesterday so I believe fact.
|
Honestly the first time I have ever heard this sentence.
__________________
"Life of Russian hockey veterans is very hard," said Soviet hockey star Sergei Makarov. "Most of them don't have enough to eat these days. These old players are Russian legends."
|
|
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Makarov For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:02 PM
|
#42
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
I'd throw Backlund in as untouchable too.
|
Backlund and Brodie untouchable......................holly #### we are loose with that term. We are so starved for prospects that anyone under the age of 25 that looks like they might be an NHL player of some sort is untouchable................rediculous.
There are no untouchables on this 14th place team, except mabe Sven if we truely believe he's got the ability to be an elite forward in the future. Players that may look like decent NHLers in the future should not be "untouchable".
|
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:02 PM
|
#43
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier
While it would be great, I think the ROR move shows that this organization is still committed to challenging for the playoffs this year; and they know that Kiprusoff is their single best chance of making it happen this season. I think the only way we rebuild is if KK/Feaster get canned.
|
You have to explain to me how going after a guy who just turned 22 means they are in a win now mindset where everything is about making the playoffs this year. Comments like this are rather infuriating and make no sense to me.
There is plenty to get on Feaster's case about, but don't rag on him for things he's not doing.
|
|
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to nfotiu For This Useful Post:
|
BloodFetish,
getbak,
HelloHockeyFans,
Hockey_Ninja,
Kaine,
MrMastodonFarm,
renny,
Ryan Coke,
squiggs96,
Table 5,
Vox,
Winsor_Pilates
|
03-04-2013, 01:06 PM
|
#44
|
First Line Centre
|
Kipper has value and its time to deal him.
Flames are not going to win the cup with or without him. TIme to get a little asset valur for him. For next year bring over Ramo and sign a veteran goalie for a 2 yearish contract. Some decent veterans potential veterans goalies on the market.
Backstrom, Thomas, Howard, Smith.
|
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:07 PM
|
#45
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle
Backlund and Brodie untouchable......................holly #### we are loose with that term. We are so starved for prospects that anyone under the age of 25 that looks like they might be an NHL player of some sort is untouchable................rediculous.
There are no untouchables on this 14th place team, except mabe Sven if we truely believe he's got the ability to be an elite forward in the future. Players that may look like decent NHLers in the future should not be "untouchable".
|
Actually now that I think about it you're right.
This team has zero foundation in place for a good team. In no position can we say "well, atleast we're good in ______ for the next few years"...
This team needs upgrades across the board and none of our prospects look like they're going to step up to the plate any time soon (maybe backlund if he can get back to pre-injury form).
The more I think about it, the scarier it gets.
EDIT: Okay, we have a lot of decent second liners....
 
|
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:14 PM
|
#46
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Do you think Omsk will let him be bought out by CGY? Especially if the Rumors are true that they want to throw some big time money at him? I mean if that is the case I could see the Flames deal Kipper.
|
If he makes it clear to them that his plan is to come to Calgary next year, why would they prevent it? Other than spite, there's no good reason to block the Flames from signing him now.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:15 PM
|
#47
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
Ramo's KHL season could be over tomorrow morning. His team is playing game 7 of its first-round playoff series at 4:00pm Moscow time, which I believe is 5:00am MST.
I know Feaster has said all the right things about him not being an option this season, but it will be interesting to see if that changes once his season is officially over over there.
|
I highly doubt this because Ramo would have to clear waivers to play in the NHL this year.
|
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:16 PM
|
#48
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Halifax
|
Unless we go on a big losing streak until the deadline I don't see the possibility of moving Kipper being there. Even then I see us making some desperation move to try to save the season rather then trade him. I think if we blow the rest of the season, and it continues onto next season, that's when we see major changes, which is sad.
|
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:24 PM
|
#49
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu
You have to explain to me how going after a guy who just turned 22 means they are in a win now mindset where everything is about making the playoffs this year. Comments like this are rather infuriating and make no sense to me.
There is plenty to get on Feaster's case about, but don't rag on him for things he's not doing.
|
So you are saying he is not trying to make the playoffs this year, then?
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
|
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:24 PM
|
#50
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Anytime anyone uses the phrase "... the mandate to win now", that's when I stop reading their post, and avoid their next one as well.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Knalus For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:30 PM
|
#51
|
n00b!
|
Moving Kiprusoff is interesting, but I wonder what kind of return Calgary would get for him... historically, I don't think number one goalies ever get fair value back.
|
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:30 PM
|
#52
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoFlamesGo1989
I highly doubt this because Ramo would have to clear waivers to play in the NHL this year.
|
I don't think he would.
Is he not a Flames RFA who is likely on our reserve list....if those two things are true we saw that he wouldn't have to clear waivers.
|
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:32 PM
|
#53
|
Referee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the hill
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
I don't think he would.
Is he not a Flames RFA who is likely on our reserve list....if those two things are true we saw that he wouldn't have to clear waivers.
|
Ramo would not have to clear waivers. He's on Calgary's reserve list, and thus falls within the new exception to Rule 13.23.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Iowa_Flames_Fan For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:33 PM
|
#54
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
definitely disagree his value is any higher now if anything it is lower.
He got off to a terrible start to the year and is coming off a month injury. Carolina is not trading for him, doubtful Tampa is either.
Florida might have interest due to the low actual $. Toronto, Detriot could have interest. I see the Wings wanting Bouw more than any Flame however.
Kipper is not getting a huge return unless he comes back and goes lights out for 5-10 games and that will result in the Flames playing 0.700 hockey and likely not trading him off.
Kipper trade will likely be revisited at the draft or possibly the deadline if the right offer comes by.
|
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:35 PM
|
#55
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knalus
Anytime anyone uses the phrase "... the mandate to win now", that's when I stop reading their post, and avoid their next one as well.
|
Might as well put me on ignore list if you have not already.
|
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:36 PM
|
#56
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier
So you are saying he is not trying to make the playoffs this year, then?
|
Going after Ryan O'Reily, who was 21 a month ago isn't a sign of that. That's the point.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:37 PM
|
#57
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Teams interested in Kiprusoff are not going to look at a small stretch of games to judge his worth, they are going to look at his play in general. I personally think Miikka has significant trade value, he is top 5 IMO when he's on his game, plus he might very well be the toughest goalie mentally in the NHL.
|
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:37 PM
|
#58
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_baby_burn
I guess it all depends on what Kipper wants. He looks pretty content to me.
|
Kipper always gave me the impression that he doesn't really care where he plays, as long as he gets to go fishing in the summer. That lack of emotion or attachment is probably why he's a goalie who never gets rattled, but it also means he'd not be devastated about leaving. He pretty much gets the hell out of dodge as soon as the season is over anyway.
He's been my favorite Flame ever since he got here, but him moving on might be the best for everyone. He can get himself into the playoffs again, and we can start moving on with the next generation.
|
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:38 PM
|
#59
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
Going after Ryan O'Reily, who was 21 a month ago isn't a sign of that. That's the point.
|
So you do think mgm would trade Kiprusoff, who is their single most important piece to making a playoff push this year? I would disagree. I don't think mgm would be willing to do that.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
|
|
|
03-04-2013, 01:42 PM
|
#60
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan
Ramo would not have to clear waivers. He's on Calgary's reserve list, and thus falls within the new exception to Rule 13.23.
|
Isn't this the same thing as Ryan O'Rielly though?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:44 AM.
|
|