05-11-2016, 11:45 AM
|
#501
|
Franchise Player
|
And around it goes again.
How anyone can look at those stats and see that the Flames are 10 lbs per person smaller than every other team, and not see that there is a problem there, in a game that is quite physical in nature, is absolutely beyond me.
The only way to come to that conclusion (that it isn't an issue), is to have a prejudice against size (the silly notion that bigger means less skilled). And it is clear that some of you are quite guilty of that notion.
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 11:46 AM
|
#502
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by heep223
Who the hell isn't trying to get big, skilled, physical, fast players? Saying the Flames need to get bigger without sacrificing skill is like saying that the team needs to get better to win the Stanley cup. It's not easy to do. Usually size sacrifices skill and speed. Which is why some posters worry about that strategy as opposed to BPA.
The Flames want to get bigger. In most cases, that means they will be slower and/or less skilled.
|
There's your problem right there. Absolutely silly notion.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-11-2016, 11:52 AM
|
#503
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
the Flames are 10 lbs per person smaller than every other team
|
*were. When we had lame ducks like Hudler, Raymond, and Russell on roster.
And also those stats are dubious as it is due to the youth of our team, because Monahan is listed at 195lbs, Bennett at 186, Kulak at 187 etc. None of these represent "prime playing weights". Even Gaudreau, listed at 157, might be 10+lbs heavier at this stage.
We also added Jokipakka and Nakladal by the end of the year.
And they ignore that our prospect base is decent-sized, Jankowski, Poirier, Wotherspoon, Hathaway, Grant, Hamilton, etc.
Our lack of skill compared to teams like San Jose is more blatantly obvious than our lack of size - at this point. Would we love to add Joe Thornton, absolutely. But that doesn't mean you should turn down Joe Pavelski.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
Last edited by GranteedEV; 05-11-2016 at 11:56 AM.
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 12:02 PM
|
#504
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
*were. When we had lame ducks like Hudler, Raymond, and Russell on roster.
And also those stats are dubious as it is due to the youth of our team, because Monahan is listed at 195lbs, Bennett at 186, Kulak at 187 etc. None of these represent "prime playing weights". Even Gaudreau, listed at 157, might be 10+lbs heavier at this stage.
We also added Jokipakka and Nakladal by the end of the year.
And they ignore that our prospect base is decent-sized, Jankowski, Poirier, Wotherspoon, Hathaway, Grant, Hamilton, etc.
Our lack of skill compared to teams like San Jose is more blatantly obvious than our lack of size - at this point. Would we love to add Joe Thornton, absolutely. But that doesn't mean you should turn down Joe Pavelski.
|
And for the 100th time, absolutely no one is suggesting that we should.
Who are the softest teams in the west?
Edmonton
Calgary
Vancouver
Colorado
Enough said.
The final 4 teams in the west are all big AND skilled. So the notion that you can't be both is ludicrous.
Size is a secondary issue, behind skill. No question.
But for the Flames, size IS an issue. The best teams are bigger than the Flames. They are also (arguably) more skilled. But the size gap is larger than the skill gap.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-11-2016, 12:08 PM
|
#505
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
And for the 100th time, absolutely no one is suggesting that we should.
Who are the softest teams in the west?
Edmonton
Calgary
Vancouver
Colorado
Enough said.
The final 4 teams in the west are all big AND skilled. So the notion that you can't be both is ludicrous.
Size is a secondary issue, behind skill. No question.
But for the Flames, size IS an issue. The best teams are bigger than the Flames. They are also (arguably) more skilled. But the size gap is larger than the skill gap.
|
I'm confident you would have had San Jose in your list last year.
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 12:17 PM
|
#506
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
And for the 100th time, absolutely no one is suggesting that we should.
Who are the softest teams in the west?
Edmonton
Calgary
Vancouver
Colorado
Enough said.
|
You forgot Chicago. Because they are immune to the narrative because they win.
And what makes the Avs soft? Iginla, Holden, Landeskog. They're not even small, Soderberg, Bigras, Erik Johnson, MacKinnon. They just fit your narrative because they're a bad team that plays a run n gun style. They are not a softer team than the Blackhawks.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
Last edited by GranteedEV; 05-11-2016 at 12:25 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-11-2016, 12:29 PM
|
#507
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
And for the 100th time, absolutely no one is suggesting that we should.
Who are the softest teams in the west?
Edmonton
Calgary
Vancouver
Colorado
Enough said.
The final 4 teams in the west are all big AND skilled. So the notion that you can't be both is ludicrous.
Size is a secondary issue, behind skill. No question.
But for the Flames, size IS an issue. The best teams are bigger than the Flames. They are also (arguably) more skilled. But the size gap is larger than the skill gap.
|
The Flames were soft by design of the coach as there's plenty of large bodies on the team. They were purposely amongst the bottom of the league when it came to taking penalties and played a strategy based on quick transition over grinding things out ion the boards. This wasn't Darryl Sutter's Flames that were relentless in their puck pursuit and really that type of play simply isn't going to suit guys like Gadreau, Monahan, or Brodie. There's nothing wrong with the makeup of the roster outside of a lack of skilled wingers and a shutdown defenseman and the reason they are where they are today is because they are still a rebuilding team so comparing them against fully cooked teams like Chicago, St. Louis, LA, etc is apples to oranges. This notion that they need to start adding these hulking bodies is ludicrous. I'm not saying that big players can't be skilled but unfortunately those players typically get picked before the Flames get to use their first pick unless they want to reach for more Hunter Smith's.
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 12:47 PM
|
#508
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
You forgot Chicago. Because they are immune to the narrative because they win.
And what makes the Avs soft? Iginla, Holden, Landeskog. They're not even small, Soderberg, Bigras, Erik Johnson, MacKinnon. They just fit your narrative because they're a bad team that plays a run n gun style. They are not a softer team than the Blackhawks.
|
They win because their skill gap vastly outweigh the size gap
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey Fan #751
The Oilers won't finish 14th in the West forever.
Eventually a couple of expansion teams will be added which will nestle the Oilers into 16th.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Point Blank For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-11-2016, 12:56 PM
|
#509
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Victoria, BC
|
Unfortunately, I think the Blues will win tonight.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Drak For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-11-2016, 01:06 PM
|
#510
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
*were. When we had lame ducks like Hudler, Raymond, and Russell on roster.
And also those stats are dubious as it is due to the youth of our team, because Monahan is listed at 195lbs, Bennett at 186, Kulak at 187 etc. None of these represent "prime playing weights". Even Gaudreau, listed at 157, might be 10+lbs heavier at this stage.
We also added Jokipakka and Nakladal by the end of the year.
And they ignore that our prospect base is decent-sized, Jankowski, Poirier, Wotherspoon, Hathaway, Grant, Hamilton, etc.
Our lack of skill compared to teams like San Jose is more blatantly obvious than our lack of size - at this point. Would we love to add Joe Thornton, absolutely. But that doesn't mean you should turn down Joe Pavelski.
|
Absolutely true that the young Flames are bigger than listed. Monahan may never have played a NHL game at 195.
BUT why would that not be the same for other teams rosters.... Jamie Benn is only 210? He was listed as 6-2 203 in 2008 as an 18 year old on the Kelowna rockets roster Backlund was listed as 6-1 194 on the rockets 2009 playoff roster. According to NHL.com he has put on 5 lbs since he was 19. He appears to 2-3 times as strong as he was when he broke in with the Flames.
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 01:09 PM
|
#512
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
|
The notion that getting hit by someone 6'1" 210 is dramatically different than getting hit by someone 5'11" 195 is ridiculous. Soft is more style than size.
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 01:10 PM
|
#513
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
So...if the Stars win this game the conditions are met and the Flames get their 1st?
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-11-2016, 01:12 PM
|
#514
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Field near Field, AB
|
This is the post-game game of the season for Flames fans because we need Dallas to win!
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 01:12 PM
|
#515
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
So...if the Stars win this game the conditions are met and the Flames get their 1st?
|
That is correct
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Robbob For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-11-2016, 01:13 PM
|
#516
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob
That is correct
|
Go Dallas GO!
Get a hat-trick Kris!
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 01:19 PM
|
#517
|
Franchise Player
|
Bouwmeester vs Russell; no matter the outcome, someone is getting a beating on CP
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 01:19 PM
|
#518
|
Franchise Player
|
OT winner by Russell would be pretty epic for both the Dallas and Flames fanbases
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 01:20 PM
|
#519
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sunny California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
So...if the Stars win this game the conditions are met and the Flames get their 1st?
|
And Calgary hires Hitchcock after he gets fired by St. Louis.
__________________
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 01:24 PM
|
#520
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Never been so interested in a Dallas game before.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:38 PM.
|
|