Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-06-2017, 10:25 AM   #4961
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Said it before but I'll say it again... here are my ideal lines for next year

Gaudreau - Bennett - Versteeg
Tkachuk - Monahan - Ferland
Frolik - Backlund - Brouwer
Lazar - Jankowski - Chiasson

Giordano - Hamilton
Brodie - Stone
Del Zotto - Andersson

Fleury
Gillies
That 1st line would get absolutely bodied along the boards. You didn't put a winger on that line who can fight through checking. I really don't think we can afford to have Tkachuk and Ferland on the same line. The player who most needs a player like them is Gaudreau, he needs a powerforward on his line to make room for him, win board battles after dump ins, drive the net, etc. Using the same players you had I'd rather see


Gaudreau-Monahan-Tkachuk
Ferland-Bennett-Versteeg
Frolik-Backlund-Brouwer
Bouma-Lazar-Hathaway

Not totally sure Versteeg is a fit. If Jankowski is ready to make the NHL I'd go with

Gaudreau-Monahan-Tkachuk
Bennett-Jankowski-Ferland
Frolik-Backlund-Brouwer
Bouma-Lazar-Hathaway

What if the top line winger that people are wanting can be filled from within? Gaudreau, Tkachuk and Bennett would make 3 1st line wingers to me. That's enough to win with
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-06-2017, 10:35 AM   #4962
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kukkudo View Post
Only thing I see is goaltending. Your expectations for Jankowski (1st year), Tkachuk (2nd year) seem too be high. I expect Bennett to take the next step.The bottom pairing D is hit and miss so you really can't say its an improvement.

I expect Treliving to make some moves but nothing earth shattering.
I expect Tkachuk to slightly improve his all around play and Jankowski to play like a third liner. If anything Andersson is the biggest reach on that line-up. Kulak would probably be my day one starter.

Our problem last year was our bottom 6 sucked, our bottom pairing couldn't push the puck up the ice, and our goaltending was inconsistent.

That line-up improves all of those things.

Last edited by DJones; 06-06-2017 at 10:41 AM.
DJones is offline  
Old 06-06-2017, 10:38 AM   #4963
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kukkudo View Post
Only thing I see is goaltending. Your expectations for Jankowski (1st year), Tkachuk (2nd year) seem too be high. I expect Bennett to take the next step.The bottom pairing D is hit and miss so you really can't say its an improvement.

I expect Treliving to make some moves but nothing earth shattering.
Expectations for Jankowski should be high with the development path he's taken. After 4 years of college and 1 full year in the minors he's developed longer than most prospects and as such should be ready to step into the NHL and make an immediate impact. This isn't a 19/20 year old kid that needs to be babied into the lineup. This is a mature kid who has been given all the time he needed to develop. He's likely ready to step in and made an immediate impact as a 2nd or 3rd line centre.

Why shouldn't expectations for Tkachuk be high? He's the best Flames player at controlling the puck along the boards I've ever seen, nevermind at his age. He's skilled, has good vision, knows how to crash the net, win board battles. He's a 1st line power winger in the near future and many of us think that's next year. I mean he could have a sophomore slump but I expect this kid to take a step forward. Should people have had high expectations for Monahan and Gaudreau in their 2nd years? Why not Tkachuk?
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-06-2017, 10:40 AM   #4964
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
That 1st line would get absolutely bodied along the boards. You didn't put a winger on that line who can fight through checking. I really don't think we can afford to have Tkachuk and Ferland on the same line. The player who most needs a player like them is Gaudreau, he needs a powerforward on his line to make room for him, win board battles after dump ins, drive the net, etc. Using the same players you had I'd rather see


Gaudreau-Monahan-Tkachuk
Ferland-Bennett-Versteeg
Frolik-Backlund-Brouwer
Bouma-Lazar-Hathaway

Not totally sure Versteeg is a fit. If Jankowski is ready to make the NHL I'd go with

Gaudreau-Monahan-Tkachuk
Bennett-Jankowski-Ferland
Frolik-Backlund-Brouwer
Bouma-Lazar-Hathaway

What if the top line winger that people are wanting can be filled from within? Gaudreau, Tkachuk and Bennett would make 3 1st line wingers to me. That's enough to win with
Personally, I don't want Tkachuk to be anywhere near Gaudreau. I don't want Gaudreau getting into five scuffles a game. At least Ferland knows better self control and just gets into one on one scuffles.
DJones is offline  
Old 06-06-2017, 10:47 AM   #4965
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones View Post
Personally, I don't want Tkachuk to be anywhere near Gaudreau. I don't want Gaudreau getting into five scuffles a game. At least Ferland knows better self control and just gets into one on one scuffles.
Interesting, hadn't thought of that angle. Not sure if we should be concerned about that or not.

I think Gaudreau-Monahan-Tkachuk could be one of the scariest offensive lines in the NHL. Tkachuk has the skill to set up and finish but also does the things that line needs with his net crashing proclivities and domination of board play. He's got the skill of a Hudler but with the physical game of a powerforward. I salivated at the thought of that line even before we drafted Tkachuk. Would love to see them try him there next season
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-06-2017, 10:48 AM   #4966
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
That 1st line would get absolutely bodied along the boards. You didn't put a winger on that line who can fight through checking. I really don't think we can afford to have Tkachuk and Ferland on the same line. The player who most needs a player like them is Gaudreau, he needs a powerforward on his line to make room for him, win board battles after dump ins, drive the net, etc. Using the same players you had I'd rather see


Gaudreau-Monahan-Tkachuk
Ferland-Bennett-Versteeg
Frolik-Backlund-Brouwer
Bouma-Lazar-Hathaway

Not totally sure Versteeg is a fit. If Jankowski is ready to make the NHL I'd go with

Gaudreau-Monahan-Tkachuk
Bennett-Jankowski-Ferland
Frolik-Backlund-Brouwer
Bouma-Lazar-Hathaway

What if the top line winger that people are wanting can be filled from within? Gaudreau, Tkachuk and Bennett would make 3 1st line wingers to me. That's enough to win with
I like having tkachuk or bennett on the first line RW. Though i do question the idea that size/physicality/grit as a required attribute for the winger playing alongside gaudrea/monahan. They were one of the top lines in the league with hudler as their RW. I think that a high skill level and good finish is critical for the role. It's actually for that reason (as you posted in your next post) that makes tkachuck such an intriguing candidate. His play with the puck in tight quarters is understated, but is absolutely unbelievable, which could play an incredible role on that line.

i'm not that worried about the extra curriculars that tkatchuk brings post whistle. It's not like frolik/backlund are the grittiest of players. Tkatchuk typically held is own without needing backup in the scrums.
bubbsy is offline  
Old 06-06-2017, 11:00 AM   #4967
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
i'm not that worried about the extra curriculars that tkatchuk brings post whistle. It's not like frolik/backlund are the grittiest of players. Tkatchuk typically held is own without needing backup in the scrums.
I actually thought Backlund showed some nastiness this year. I liked it.

Online he was getting a reputation for being dirty. Which is obviously nonsense but people were noticing him anyway. Not sure we'll get that from Monahan or Gaudreau.
DJones is offline  
Old 06-06-2017, 11:32 AM   #4968
loob job
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Exp:
Default

I have heard that Drouin turned down a pretty big bridge deal. Seems like his time in Tampa could be short.
loob job is offline  
Old 06-06-2017, 11:37 AM   #4969
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loob job View Post
I have heard that Drouin turned down a pretty big bridge deal. Seems like his time in Tampa could be short.
Sounds like he is on the way out. They have Palat, Drouin, Johnson that need new contracts and the desire to add a blueliner. Rumors they would move Johnson or Drouin for a Dman
Vinny01 is online now  
Old 06-06-2017, 11:39 AM   #4970
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Don't need that from Monahan. He's not a hitter, can't make him one.

He'll continue to show he's one of the toughest guys on the team by going into the dirty areas every shift he's out there, taking the crosschecks and the chops, winning the out-manned battle along the boards to retain possession.
Flash Walken is offline  
Old 06-06-2017, 11:44 AM   #4971
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
Don't need that from Monahan. He's not a hitter, can't make him one.

He'll continue to show he's one of the toughest guys on the team by going into the dirty areas every shift he's out there, taking the crosschecks and the chops, winning the out-manned battle along the boards to retain possession.
Which is fine. I'm just not sure that's the best kind of temperament to put with Tkachuk. Having Ferland there would solve that problem though.
DJones is offline  
Old 06-06-2017, 11:58 AM   #4972
sa226
#1 Goaltender
 
sa226's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Back in Calgary!!
Exp:
Default

Bennett becoming an impact player changes the entire dynamic of the team. They need him to do that soon.

As awesome as the Backlund line was last year, their suitability as a second line depends on the effectiveness of the first line. Backlund can't do all of the heavy lifting, like he did last year.

Monahan and Gaudreau need to earn their paychecks for 82 games, not 50 to 60.

If an impact Bennett, and a couple spunky youngsters along with improved goaltending and a solidified defence join the above situation, we are in great shape.

I could always be wrong, but the core is in place. With the current cap situation, big name additions won't happen without significant subtractions.
sa226 is offline  
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to sa226 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-06-2017, 12:10 PM   #4973
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sa226 View Post
Bennett becoming an impact player changes the entire dynamic of the team. They need him to do that soon.

As awesome as the Backlund line was last year, their suitability as a second line depends on the effectiveness of the first line. Backlund can't do all of the heavy lifting, like he did last year.

Monahan and Gaudreau need to earn their paychecks for 82 games, not 50 to 60.

If an impact Bennett, and a couple spunky youngsters along with improved goaltending and a solidified defence join the above situation, we are in great shape.

I could always be wrong, but the core is in place. With the current cap situation, big name additions won't happen without significant subtractions.
Yeah, and this is what Tre means when he talks about most of the growth having to be internal. If the Flames 25 and under core continue to get better, this team will be really F-ing good. If they don't we will stagnate as a decent playoff team that is unlikely to get over the hump. Hamilton, Gaudreau, Monahan, Bennett, Tkachuk, Ferland and Lazar.

Also, as aging overpaid depth players become UFA's, we need kids from the farm to step up and become contributing NHLers. This coming year will be a big opportunity for guys like Kulak, Andersson, Kylington and Wotherspoon on the back end, and over the next two years we need a few guys out of Jankowski, Shinkaruk, Poirier, Klimchuk, Mangiapane, Hathaway, Lomberg to become solid NHL depth players at the very least so we don't have to overpay a bunch more older UFA's to augment the above core.
Roof-Daddy is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-06-2017, 12:14 PM   #4974
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever_Iggy View Post
Largely shuffling the chairs on an underwhelming 2016 team would be disappointing. The forwards need an upgrade.
Improvement will come internally. Bennett and Tkachuk can be expected to take another step. Even if they plateau offensively, Gaudreau, Monahan, and Hamilton can (and should) still see improvement in their overall game. Jankowski and Lazar will bring some dynamism to the bottom two lines. The team is accustomed to Gulutzan's system.

Without any signings, I would expect the team to improve moderately over last season's results. With an upgrade on the second pairing and in goal I would expect substantial improvement.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline  
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-06-2017, 12:14 PM   #4975
fotiou22
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Exp:
Default

Would love to see Gaudreau and Bennett get a chance together. We've seen good chemistry between Monahan and Versteeg -- Tkachuk feels like a perfect compliment. Each of these lines has grit and skill.

If Brouwer is moved out, then Lazar could fit nicely with Frolik/Backlund.

Gaudreau - Bennett - Ferland
Tkachuk - Monahan - Versteeg
Frolik - Backlund - Brouwer
Lazar - Jankowski - Chiasson

Giordano - Hamilton
Brodie - Stone
Del Zotto - Andersson

Fleury
Gillies


Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Said it before but I'll say it again... here are my ideal lines for next year

Gaudreau - Bennett - Versteeg
Tkachuk - Monahan - Ferland
Frolik - Backlund - Brouwer
Lazar - Jankowski - Chiasson

Giordano - Hamilton
Brodie - Stone
Del Zotto - Andersson

Fleury
Gillies
fotiou22 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to fotiou22 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-06-2017, 12:38 PM   #4976
Mattman
First Line Centre
 
Mattman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: YYC
Exp:
Default

http://m.rus.delfi.lv/sport/article.php?id=48919139
https://www.hockeyfeed.com/nhl-news/...-alex-ovechkin

Quote:
"The Flames have offered the Capitals a trade for Ovechkin which involves Oliver Kylington, and two first round picks"
Checked back a few pages and didn't see this discussed or brought up. Sorry if it has.
__________________
Mattman is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mattman For This Useful Post:
Old 06-06-2017, 12:40 PM   #4977
Clever_Iggy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Improvement will come internally. Bennett and Tkachuk can be expected to take another step. Even if they plateau offensively, Gaudreau, Monahan, and Hamilton can (and should) still see improvement in their overall game. Jankowski and Lazar will bring some dynamism to the bottom two lines. The team is accustomed to Gulutzan's system.

Without any signings, I would expect the team to improve moderately over last season's results. With an upgrade on the second pairing and in goal I would expect substantial improvement.
Absolutely. I think the lack of skill in the top 9 forwards is concerning.
Clever_Iggy is offline  
Old 06-06-2017, 12:41 PM   #4978
CMPunk
aka Spike
 
CMPunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Darkest Corners of My Mind
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattman View Post
http://m.rus.delfi.lv/sport/article.php?id=48919139
https://www.hockeyfeed.com/nhl-news/...-alex-ovechkin



Checked back a few pages and didn't see this discussed or brought up. Sorry if it has.
There's a whole thread dedicated to it:
http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthread.php?t=162304
CMPunk is offline  
Old 06-06-2017, 12:52 PM   #4979
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever_Iggy View Post
Absolutely. I think the lack of skill in the top 9 forwards is concerning.
Gaudreau
Backlund
Monahan
Tkachuk
Bennett
Frolik

All high skill guys.

Ferland
Versteeg
Jankowski
Brouwer

Borderline

Depth is fine. We just don't have an elite center and they are all left handed.
DJones is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to DJones For This Useful Post:
Old 06-06-2017, 12:58 PM   #4980
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones View Post
Gaudreau
Backlund
Monahan
Tkachuk
Bennett
Frolik

All high skill guys.

Ferland
Versteeg
Jankowski
Brouwer

Borderline

Depth is fine. We just don't have an elite center and they are all left handed.
Jankowski is much more skilled than Frolik and probably right there with Backlund. Brouwer however is not a top 9 forward.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:03 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy