06-06-2017, 10:25 AM
|
#4961
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
Said it before but I'll say it again... here are my ideal lines for next year
Gaudreau - Bennett - Versteeg
Tkachuk - Monahan - Ferland
Frolik - Backlund - Brouwer
Lazar - Jankowski - Chiasson
Giordano - Hamilton
Brodie - Stone
Del Zotto - Andersson
Fleury
Gillies
|
That 1st line would get absolutely bodied along the boards. You didn't put a winger on that line who can fight through checking. I really don't think we can afford to have Tkachuk and Ferland on the same line. The player who most needs a player like them is Gaudreau, he needs a powerforward on his line to make room for him, win board battles after dump ins, drive the net, etc. Using the same players you had I'd rather see
Gaudreau-Monahan-Tkachuk
Ferland-Bennett-Versteeg
Frolik-Backlund-Brouwer
Bouma-Lazar-Hathaway
Not totally sure Versteeg is a fit. If Jankowski is ready to make the NHL I'd go with
Gaudreau-Monahan-Tkachuk
Bennett-Jankowski-Ferland
Frolik-Backlund-Brouwer
Bouma-Lazar-Hathaway
What if the top line winger that people are wanting can be filled from within? Gaudreau, Tkachuk and Bennett would make 3 1st line wingers to me. That's enough to win with
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-06-2017, 10:35 AM
|
#4962
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kukkudo
Only thing I see is goaltending. Your expectations for Jankowski (1st year), Tkachuk (2nd year) seem too be high. I expect Bennett to take the next step.The bottom pairing D is hit and miss so you really can't say its an improvement.
I expect Treliving to make some moves but nothing earth shattering.
|
I expect Tkachuk to slightly improve his all around play and Jankowski to play like a third liner. If anything Andersson is the biggest reach on that line-up. Kulak would probably be my day one starter.
Our problem last year was our bottom 6 sucked, our bottom pairing couldn't push the puck up the ice, and our goaltending was inconsistent.
That line-up improves all of those things.
Last edited by DJones; 06-06-2017 at 10:41 AM.
|
|
|
06-06-2017, 10:38 AM
|
#4963
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kukkudo
Only thing I see is goaltending. Your expectations for Jankowski (1st year), Tkachuk (2nd year) seem too be high. I expect Bennett to take the next step.The bottom pairing D is hit and miss so you really can't say its an improvement.
I expect Treliving to make some moves but nothing earth shattering.
|
Expectations for Jankowski should be high with the development path he's taken. After 4 years of college and 1 full year in the minors he's developed longer than most prospects and as such should be ready to step into the NHL and make an immediate impact. This isn't a 19/20 year old kid that needs to be babied into the lineup. This is a mature kid who has been given all the time he needed to develop. He's likely ready to step in and made an immediate impact as a 2nd or 3rd line centre.
Why shouldn't expectations for Tkachuk be high? He's the best Flames player at controlling the puck along the boards I've ever seen, nevermind at his age. He's skilled, has good vision, knows how to crash the net, win board battles. He's a 1st line power winger in the near future and many of us think that's next year. I mean he could have a sophomore slump but I expect this kid to take a step forward. Should people have had high expectations for Monahan and Gaudreau in their 2nd years? Why not Tkachuk?
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-06-2017, 10:40 AM
|
#4964
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
That 1st line would get absolutely bodied along the boards. You didn't put a winger on that line who can fight through checking. I really don't think we can afford to have Tkachuk and Ferland on the same line. The player who most needs a player like them is Gaudreau, he needs a powerforward on his line to make room for him, win board battles after dump ins, drive the net, etc. Using the same players you had I'd rather see
Gaudreau-Monahan-Tkachuk
Ferland-Bennett-Versteeg
Frolik-Backlund-Brouwer
Bouma-Lazar-Hathaway
Not totally sure Versteeg is a fit. If Jankowski is ready to make the NHL I'd go with
Gaudreau-Monahan-Tkachuk
Bennett-Jankowski-Ferland
Frolik-Backlund-Brouwer
Bouma-Lazar-Hathaway
What if the top line winger that people are wanting can be filled from within? Gaudreau, Tkachuk and Bennett would make 3 1st line wingers to me. That's enough to win with
|
Personally, I don't want Tkachuk to be anywhere near Gaudreau. I don't want Gaudreau getting into five scuffles a game. At least Ferland knows better self control and just gets into one on one scuffles.
|
|
|
06-06-2017, 10:47 AM
|
#4965
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones
Personally, I don't want Tkachuk to be anywhere near Gaudreau. I don't want Gaudreau getting into five scuffles a game. At least Ferland knows better self control and just gets into one on one scuffles.
|
Interesting, hadn't thought of that angle. Not sure if we should be concerned about that or not.
I think Gaudreau-Monahan-Tkachuk could be one of the scariest offensive lines in the NHL. Tkachuk has the skill to set up and finish but also does the things that line needs with his net crashing proclivities and domination of board play. He's got the skill of a Hudler but with the physical game of a powerforward. I salivated at the thought of that line even before we drafted Tkachuk. Would love to see them try him there next season
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-06-2017, 10:48 AM
|
#4966
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
That 1st line would get absolutely bodied along the boards. You didn't put a winger on that line who can fight through checking. I really don't think we can afford to have Tkachuk and Ferland on the same line. The player who most needs a player like them is Gaudreau, he needs a powerforward on his line to make room for him, win board battles after dump ins, drive the net, etc. Using the same players you had I'd rather see
Gaudreau-Monahan-Tkachuk
Ferland-Bennett-Versteeg
Frolik-Backlund-Brouwer
Bouma-Lazar-Hathaway
Not totally sure Versteeg is a fit. If Jankowski is ready to make the NHL I'd go with
Gaudreau-Monahan-Tkachuk
Bennett-Jankowski-Ferland
Frolik-Backlund-Brouwer
Bouma-Lazar-Hathaway
What if the top line winger that people are wanting can be filled from within? Gaudreau, Tkachuk and Bennett would make 3 1st line wingers to me. That's enough to win with
|
I like having tkachuk or bennett on the first line RW. Though i do question the idea that size/physicality/grit as a required attribute for the winger playing alongside gaudrea/monahan. They were one of the top lines in the league with hudler as their RW. I think that a high skill level and good finish is critical for the role. It's actually for that reason (as you posted in your next post) that makes tkachuck such an intriguing candidate. His play with the puck in tight quarters is understated, but is absolutely unbelievable, which could play an incredible role on that line.
i'm not that worried about the extra curriculars that tkatchuk brings post whistle. It's not like frolik/backlund are the grittiest of players. Tkatchuk typically held is own without needing backup in the scrums.
|
|
|
06-06-2017, 11:00 AM
|
#4967
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy
i'm not that worried about the extra curriculars that tkatchuk brings post whistle. It's not like frolik/backlund are the grittiest of players. Tkatchuk typically held is own without needing backup in the scrums.
|
I actually thought Backlund showed some nastiness this year. I liked it.
Online he was getting a reputation for being dirty. Which is obviously nonsense but people were noticing him anyway. Not sure we'll get that from Monahan or Gaudreau.
|
|
|
06-06-2017, 11:32 AM
|
#4968
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I have heard that Drouin turned down a pretty big bridge deal. Seems like his time in Tampa could be short.
|
|
|
06-06-2017, 11:37 AM
|
#4969
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by loob job
I have heard that Drouin turned down a pretty big bridge deal. Seems like his time in Tampa could be short.
|
Sounds like he is on the way out. They have Palat, Drouin, Johnson that need new contracts and the desire to add a blueliner. Rumors they would move Johnson or Drouin for a Dman
|
|
|
06-06-2017, 11:39 AM
|
#4970
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Don't need that from Monahan. He's not a hitter, can't make him one.
He'll continue to show he's one of the toughest guys on the team by going into the dirty areas every shift he's out there, taking the crosschecks and the chops, winning the out-manned battle along the boards to retain possession.
|
|
|
06-06-2017, 11:44 AM
|
#4971
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Don't need that from Monahan. He's not a hitter, can't make him one.
He'll continue to show he's one of the toughest guys on the team by going into the dirty areas every shift he's out there, taking the crosschecks and the chops, winning the out-manned battle along the boards to retain possession.
|
Which is fine. I'm just not sure that's the best kind of temperament to put with Tkachuk. Having Ferland there would solve that problem though.
|
|
|
06-06-2017, 11:58 AM
|
#4972
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Back in Calgary!!
|
Bennett becoming an impact player changes the entire dynamic of the team. They need him to do that soon.
As awesome as the Backlund line was last year, their suitability as a second line depends on the effectiveness of the first line. Backlund can't do all of the heavy lifting, like he did last year.
Monahan and Gaudreau need to earn their paychecks for 82 games, not 50 to 60.
If an impact Bennett, and a couple spunky youngsters along with improved goaltending and a solidified defence join the above situation, we are in great shape.
I could always be wrong, but the core is in place. With the current cap situation, big name additions won't happen without significant subtractions.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to sa226 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-06-2017, 12:10 PM
|
#4973
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sa226
Bennett becoming an impact player changes the entire dynamic of the team. They need him to do that soon.
As awesome as the Backlund line was last year, their suitability as a second line depends on the effectiveness of the first line. Backlund can't do all of the heavy lifting, like he did last year.
Monahan and Gaudreau need to earn their paychecks for 82 games, not 50 to 60.
If an impact Bennett, and a couple spunky youngsters along with improved goaltending and a solidified defence join the above situation, we are in great shape.
I could always be wrong, but the core is in place. With the current cap situation, big name additions won't happen without significant subtractions.
|
Yeah, and this is what Tre means when he talks about most of the growth having to be internal. If the Flames 25 and under core continue to get better, this team will be really F-ing good. If they don't we will stagnate as a decent playoff team that is unlikely to get over the hump. Hamilton, Gaudreau, Monahan, Bennett, Tkachuk, Ferland and Lazar.
Also, as aging overpaid depth players become UFA's, we need kids from the farm to step up and become contributing NHLers. This coming year will be a big opportunity for guys like Kulak, Andersson, Kylington and Wotherspoon on the back end, and over the next two years we need a few guys out of Jankowski, Shinkaruk, Poirier, Klimchuk, Mangiapane, Hathaway, Lomberg to become solid NHL depth players at the very least so we don't have to overpay a bunch more older UFA's to augment the above core.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-06-2017, 12:14 PM
|
#4974
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever_Iggy
Largely shuffling the chairs on an underwhelming 2016 team would be disappointing. The forwards need an upgrade.
|
Improvement will come internally. Bennett and Tkachuk can be expected to take another step. Even if they plateau offensively, Gaudreau, Monahan, and Hamilton can (and should) still see improvement in their overall game. Jankowski and Lazar will bring some dynamism to the bottom two lines. The team is accustomed to Gulutzan's system.
Without any signings, I would expect the team to improve moderately over last season's results. With an upgrade on the second pairing and in goal I would expect substantial improvement.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-06-2017, 12:14 PM
|
#4975
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Apr 2011
Exp:  
|
Would love to see Gaudreau and Bennett get a chance together. We've seen good chemistry between Monahan and Versteeg -- Tkachuk feels like a perfect compliment. Each of these lines has grit and skill.
If Brouwer is moved out, then Lazar could fit nicely with Frolik/Backlund.
Gaudreau - Bennett - Ferland
Tkachuk - Monahan - Versteeg
Frolik - Backlund - Brouwer
Lazar - Jankowski - Chiasson
Giordano - Hamilton
Brodie - Stone
Del Zotto - Andersson
Fleury
Gillies
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
Said it before but I'll say it again... here are my ideal lines for next year
Gaudreau - Bennett - Versteeg
Tkachuk - Monahan - Ferland
Frolik - Backlund - Brouwer
Lazar - Jankowski - Chiasson
Giordano - Hamilton
Brodie - Stone
Del Zotto - Andersson
Fleury
Gillies
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to fotiou22 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-06-2017, 12:40 PM
|
#4977
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
Improvement will come internally. Bennett and Tkachuk can be expected to take another step. Even if they plateau offensively, Gaudreau, Monahan, and Hamilton can (and should) still see improvement in their overall game. Jankowski and Lazar will bring some dynamism to the bottom two lines. The team is accustomed to Gulutzan's system.
Without any signings, I would expect the team to improve moderately over last season's results. With an upgrade on the second pairing and in goal I would expect substantial improvement.
|
Absolutely. I think the lack of skill in the top 9 forwards is concerning.
|
|
|
06-06-2017, 12:52 PM
|
#4979
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever_Iggy
Absolutely. I think the lack of skill in the top 9 forwards is concerning.
|
Gaudreau
Backlund
Monahan
Tkachuk
Bennett
Frolik
All high skill guys.
Ferland
Versteeg
Jankowski
Brouwer
Borderline
Depth is fine. We just don't have an elite center and they are all left handed.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DJones For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-06-2017, 12:58 PM
|
#4980
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones
Gaudreau
Backlund
Monahan
Tkachuk
Bennett
Frolik
All high skill guys.
Ferland
Versteeg
Jankowski
Brouwer
Borderline
Depth is fine. We just don't have an elite center and they are all left handed.
|
Jankowski is much more skilled than Frolik and probably right there with Backlund. Brouwer however is not a top 9 forward.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:03 PM.
|
|