Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-12-2024, 08:51 PM   #381
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Who are the genius reporters that felt Ryan Reaves was the guy to ask about this?
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 02-12-2024, 08:51 PM   #382
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

This should all be about the cross-check and not any nonsense leading up to it. As a cross-check it was pretty tame. Barely any force to it. Just based on that I'd give it a two game. Just because they f'd up the Anderson suspension doesn't mean they have to mess another one up. It's worthy of two or three tops. The Leaf hate is silly.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bluejays For This Useful Post:
Old 02-12-2024, 08:53 PM   #383
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Who are the genius reporters that felt Ryan Reaves was the guy to ask about this?

Ryan Reaves is a dope. He shouldn't even be asked a question about what they play in the dressing room. The guy comes across as dumb the second he opens his mouth.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bluejays For This Useful Post:
Old 02-12-2024, 08:54 PM   #384
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays View Post
This should all be about the cross-check and not any nonsense leading up to it. As a cross-check it was pretty tame. Barely any force to it. Just based on that I'd give it a two game. Just because they f'd up the Anderson suspension doesn't mean they have to mess another one up. It's worthy of two or three tops. The Leaf hate is silly.
Its a crosscheck to the head 5 seconds AFTER a goal as the guy is skating back to the bench. The standard is the standard, the Leaf defending is silly. He is getting 6 IMO
__________________
GFG
dino7c is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 02-12-2024, 08:56 PM   #385
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Who are the genius reporters that felt Ryan Reaves was the guy to ask about this?
They knew he’d say something that would generate more clicks and generate interest in this story that’s starting to fade. Gotta fill that gap before the suspension is announced.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cecil Terwilliger For This Useful Post:
Old 02-12-2024, 08:57 PM   #386
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by midniteowl View Post
What I don't understand is, why is there no "code" against cross-checking guy in the face?

oh there is....and its gonna cost Reilly X games and hundreds of thousands of dollars.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2024, 09:11 PM   #387
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Its a crosscheck to the head 5 seconds AFTER a goal as the guy is skating back to the bench. The standard is the standard, the Leaf defending is silly. He is getting 6 IMO

Sure. But as a crosscheck it barely grazed his head. He should be accountable for his stick and his actions but hardly a callous act or one where he went bananas to hurt the guy. We've all seen way worse intents and plays. If it was a two hand cross to the head with his arms out there I could see 10, but this wasn't it. At least IMO. Especially in slow mo.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2024, 09:14 PM   #388
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

An ex-NHLer I'm close with played through multiple deep cup runs in the 80's. One of those they faced the Canadiens with a young puke named Claude Lemieux. He used to wait after warmups and shoot a shot into the opposing team's net as they left the ice. One-time the backup goalie (legend Chico Resh) stayed on the ice and kept stopping the pucks until it infuriated Lemieux. THAT is how you respond to a troll. With more hilarious trollery.*

*This incident also erupted into a full team-on-team brawl before the game even started with multiple players on the ice half-dressed, barefoot, sandals, etc..

** This team also employed the one and only Ron Hextall in his playing prime, which was also his point of highest lunacy. Google that guy and its basically 50/50 highlight reel saves mixed with him chasing players in a rage. Dude was a genuine nut.

Not sure what the point is. I personally think what Rielly did was stupid, but I also think watching Hextall chase down a guy after scoring on him is hilarious and awesome. So maybe some hypocrisy or just laughing at the old ways while knowing it should be different. But it's also all entertaining. And I'm not the one who got cross-checked in the face so meh.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2024, 09:16 PM   #389
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays View Post
Sure. But as a crosscheck it barely grazed his head. He should be accountable for his stick and his actions but hardly a callous act or one where he went bananas to hurt the guy. We've all seen way worse intents and plays. If it was a two hand cross to the head with his arms out there I could see 10, but this wasn't it. At least IMO. Especially in slow mo.
I thought it was pretty bad, maybe not 10 but 6 seems fair. What happened 5, 10, 20 years ago is irrelevant...league wants to get head shots out of the game period, let alone ones that happen well after the play with a few seconds left on the clock.
__________________
GFG

Last edited by dino7c; 02-12-2024 at 09:18 PM.
dino7c is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 02-12-2024, 09:22 PM   #390
mrkajz44
First Line Centre
 
mrkajz44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Deep South
Exp:
Default

I had a huge argument with several guys at work about this and I think what really strikes me about the "code" is how it doesn't really mean anything? Not one guy who thought that the slapshot was offside could really explain how it was "showing up the opposition" or "disrespecting the game". All they could do was toss clichés out there but couldn't rationally explain why it was so bad.

My sarcastic response to all this was "yeah, we really need to get the slapshots into an empty net out of the game - it's just ruining the NHL now".

It seems wild to me that most everyone that was part of the discussion agreed that some sort of physical altercation was required (though most agreed the cross check was too much), despite a legal play happening on the ice. The only "bad" part was the speed of the shot into the empty net - that's what necessitates violence??
__________________
Much like a sports ticker, you may feel obligated to read this
mrkajz44 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mrkajz44 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-12-2024, 09:25 PM   #391
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkajz44 View Post
I had a huge argument with several guys at work about this and I think what really strikes me about the "code" is how it doesn't really mean anything? Not one guy who thought that the slapshot was offside could really explain how it was "showing up the opposition" or "disrespecting the game". All they could do was toss clichés out there but couldn't rationally explain why it was so bad.

My sarcastic response to all this was "yeah, we really need to get the slapshots into an empty net out of the game - it's just ruining the NHL now".

It seems wild to me that most everyone that was part of the discussion agreed that some sort of physical altercation was required (though most agreed the cross check was too much), despite a legal play happening on the ice. The only "bad" part was the speed of the shot into the empty net - that's what necessitates violence??
It’s just faux machismo that is fully engrained into the sport in Canada. It’s “disrespect”, and deserves pain! Lots of pain!
Scroopy Noopers is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
Old 02-12-2024, 09:27 PM   #392
midniteowl
Franchise Player
 
midniteowl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
oh there is....and its gonna cost Reilly X games and hundreds of thousands of dollars.
I hope the x = 5 minimum and his team goes on a long losing streak.
midniteowl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2024, 09:47 PM   #393
savemedrzaius
Help, save, whatever.
 
savemedrzaius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays View Post
This should all be about the cross-check and not any nonsense leading up to it. As a cross-check it was pretty tame. Barely any force to it. Just based on that I'd give it a two game. Just because they f'd up the Anderson suspension doesn't mean they have to mess another one up. It's worthy of two or three tops. The Leaf hate is silly.
It's because it was a Leaf player who did it and it always gets blown out of proportion. Wherewas the thread about the Perron crosscheck? That was way more vicious. Was there a big uproar when Simmonds got crosschecked in the face by the Habs a vouple years back? Things changed so much? Doubt it.

https://www.reddit.com/r/leafs/comme...ey_removed_it/
savemedrzaius is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to savemedrzaius For This Useful Post:
Old 02-12-2024, 09:58 PM   #394
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkajz44 View Post
I had a huge argument with several guys at work about this and I think what really strikes me about the "code" is how it doesn't really mean anything? Not one guy who thought that the slapshot was offside could really explain how it was "showing up the opposition" or "disrespecting the game". All they could do was toss clichés out there but couldn't rationally explain why it was so bad.

My sarcastic response to all this was "yeah, we really need to get the slapshots into an empty net out of the game - it's just ruining the NHL now".

It seems wild to me that most everyone that was part of the discussion agreed that some sort of physical altercation was required (though most agreed the cross check was too much), despite a legal play happening on the ice. The only "bad" part was the speed of the shot into the empty net - that's what necessitates violence??
Your colleagues can't form an argument that is why

I'm not even a guy and I'm on the "code" side. If I was addressing this with you at work here's what it is.

It's a trust issue. Both teams know to play within these guidelines. Play hard and fair, don't show anyone up. Who do you think you are to go outside those lines showing up the opponent when the other 39 players in the lineup know their place? How DARE you! These are things weasels like Kessler do.

Again, this is why we have NFL victory formations, NBA runs out the final few seconds under the shot clock, no bunting or stealing bases while up by alot, tennis cant go for the body, cricket don't bowl bouncers to tailenders, or soccer not kicking the ball out when a player is hurt or not giving the ball back afterwards. Heck, taking your shirt off in soccer is a yellow card and that's certainly not a safety issue. Sure they sound dumb (and are dumb) but those are the parameters of the game and everyone knows that. When players go outside of those imaginary boundaries that they all know being in that sport, the other team gets mad. In hockey, the net is a team's sacred thing. You cannot argue that Greig didn't know.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GirlySports For This Useful Post:
Old 02-12-2024, 10:12 PM   #395
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by savemedrzaius View Post
It's because it was a Leaf player who did it and it always gets blown out of proportion. Wherewas the thread about the Perron crosscheck? That was way more vicious. Was there a big uproar when Simmonds got crosschecked in the face by the Habs a vouple years back? Things changed so much? Doubt it.

https://www.reddit.com/r/leafs/comme...ey_removed_it/
You are really going to come here and complain about a double standard? We are Calgary Flames fans guy

Go look at the last Lucic and Tkachuk suspensions in Calgary

/
__________________
GFG
dino7c is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 02-12-2024, 10:12 PM   #396
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports View Post
Your colleagues can't form an argument that is why

I'm not even a guy and I'm on the "code" side. If I was addressing this with you at work here's what it is.

It's a trust issue. Both teams know to play within these guidelines. Play hard and fair, don't show anyone up. Who do you think you are to go outside those lines showing up the opponent when the other 39 players in the lineup know their place? How DARE you! These are things weasels like Kessler do.

Again, this is why we have NFL victory formations, NBA runs out the final few seconds under the shot clock, no bunting or stealing bases while up by alot, tennis cant go for the body, cricket don't bowl bouncers to tailenders, or soccer not kicking the ball out when a player is hurt or not giving the ball back afterwards. Heck, taking your shirt off in soccer is a yellow card and that's certainly not a safety issue. Sure they sound dumb (and are dumb) but those are the parameters of the game and everyone knows that. When players go outside of those imaginary boundaries that they all know being in that sport, the other team gets mad. In hockey, the net is a team's sacred thing. You cannot argue that Greig didn't know.

Okay, but wait, was that even Rielly’s thought process when cross-checking Greig? Or is everyone else just reading this “code” infraction into the situation? I dunno. Is there a reason to think that he wasn’t going to cross check him anyway for scoring?
Wormius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2024, 10:14 PM   #397
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

I hope my opponent takes a massive slapper at the EN...there is a better chance they miss that way
__________________
GFG
dino7c is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 02-12-2024, 10:21 PM   #398
savemedrzaius
Help, save, whatever.
 
savemedrzaius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

It's a suspendable crosscheck but people acting like it's some "heinous" act or whatever are just showing their Leaf hate or just don't know hockey. The guys on PTI talked about the Reilly hit. Guarantee they didn't even hear about the Perron hit. Everything gets blownup because fans of other teams love to talk about the Leafs and then complain about all the media attention they get. Case in point, this thread.
savemedrzaius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2024, 10:23 PM   #399
savemedrzaius
Help, save, whatever.
 
savemedrzaius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
I hope my opponent takes a massive slapper at the EN...there is a better chance they miss that way
I don't even care about the slapper. I just don't get how this high crosscheck is so much worse than the other crosschecks that are suspendable in the NHL other than a Leafs player did it so people get a chance to bash the Leafs.
savemedrzaius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2024, 10:49 PM   #400
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

It has nothing to do with bashing the Leafs.

Crosschecking during play is a penalty, and sometimes deserves a suspension, but at least it's a foul committed in the course of the game. This was a crosscheck delivered well after the clock was stopped, and served absolutely no purpose except to vent Rielly's temper tantrum.

And as others have pointed out, it was a headshot, and the league has to punish it severely if it is serious about getting headshots out of the game.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy