05-12-2017, 12:52 PM
|
#381
|
#1 Goaltender
|
So it's the NDPs fault with their ludacris taxation.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to northcrunk For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-12-2017, 12:54 PM
|
#382
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by northcrunk
So it's the NDPs fault with their ludacris taxation.
|
"don't bring me into this"
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-12-2017, 12:54 PM
|
#383
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by northcrunk
So it's the NDPs fault with their ludacris taxation.
|
Damn, beaten to it.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-12-2017, 12:57 PM
|
#384
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Well done all.
That Anaheim Series was the 'Fyre Festival' of the NHL playoffs. What a disaster.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
05-12-2017, 12:57 PM
|
#385
|
Participant 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
Except for the fact that number is totally made up and has no bearing on reality.
|
Says the guy who calls him elite because of two great seasons (and one "above average" season where you have to change the definition of average just to call him that).
I can't be worried about his couple of average to flat out bad seasons? But you can definitively call him elite for a couple of great ones?
Whatever makes you happy.
|
|
|
05-12-2017, 12:58 PM
|
#386
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
I dont want Bishop in our crease at 36.
|
Agreed. I don't want Bishop taking $5 million in cap space at 36. I'm already petrified of having Gio taking up $6.75 million of cap space in his late 30's. It's not ideal salary cap management to have 8% of your salary cap tied up into two 35+ year old players that are no longer starting or top pairing caliber. Flames aren't near the peak of their current core so I would rather take the pain now than later when they will be in their peak. Signing Bishop to that contract is the exact opposite in that by the time the core is at it's peak Bishop will be a weak link.
|
|
|
05-12-2017, 01:00 PM
|
#387
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
The price isn't bad, but the term and NMC is ugly.
Glad the Flames weren't roped into that when there's a 50% chance he's a below average goaltender.
|
You can say the same about a lot of NHL contracts. Perhaps all the GMs think they will get a buyout window again in the next CBA.
Or they realize they might not be a GM for that team in 5-6 years so they don't care about the future as much as fans do.
I think it's a good deal for the Stars as Bishop is one of the best goalies on the market.
Last edited by Oil Stain; 05-12-2017 at 01:02 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Oil Stain For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-12-2017, 01:00 PM
|
#388
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Speculation is it's NMC in the first 3 years, NTC in the remaining 3.
|
|
|
05-12-2017, 01:03 PM
|
#389
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Speculation is it's NMC in the first 3 years, NTC in the remaining 3.
|
So they can bury him in the minors for the back end of the deal. We know Flames ownership hates paying players not to play so I don't think that's something the Flames would ever consider.
|
|
|
05-12-2017, 01:05 PM
|
#390
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
Says the guy who calls him elite because of two great seasons (and one "above average" season where you have to change the definition of average just to call him that).
I can't be worried about his couple of average to flat out bad seasons? But you can definitively call him elite for a couple of great ones?
Whatever makes you happy.
|
Haha. I didn't changed the definition of anything. You just chose to ignore the whole picture by dismissing things like wins and his Conn Smythe worthy playoff run that year.
|
|
|
05-12-2017, 01:08 PM
|
#391
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
So they can bury him in the minors for the back end of the deal. We know Flames ownership hates paying players not to play so I don't think that's something the Flames would ever consider.
|
This doesn't work very well anymore, as he would still count for over $1.0 m on the cap.
|
|
|
05-12-2017, 01:08 PM
|
#392
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
So they can bury him in the minors for the back end of the deal. We know Flames ownership hates paying players not to play so I don't think that's something the Flames would ever consider.
|
You can't bury money in the minors anymore (I believe there is a $900k in cap relief). Flames buried Hagman in the minors and ate half his salary so he could play on the Ducks.
|
|
|
05-12-2017, 01:11 PM
|
#393
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
You can't bury money in the minors anymore (I believe there is a $900k in cap relief). Flames buried Hagman in the minors and ate half his salary so he could play on the Ducks.
|
Once a team signs a player to this type of deal they have to be aware that can't escape that cap hit (unless they are okay with smearing players like Lombardi). However they can bury them just to get him off the roster so they aren't taking a roster spot away from a more capable player. For example the Flames couldn't have sent Wideman to the AHL this season even if they wanted to because of his NMC.
Last edited by Erick Estrada; 05-12-2017 at 01:14 PM.
|
|
|
05-12-2017, 01:11 PM
|
#394
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
This doesn't work very well anymore, as he would still count for over $1.0 m on the cap.
|
A lot more than that actually. If he was put in the minors his cap hit would still be $3,891,667
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-12-2017, 01:14 PM
|
#395
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
I don't think Dallas signed Bishop to a 6 year deal with the idea they might be burying 2 or 3 years of that deal in the minors...
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-12-2017, 01:15 PM
|
#396
|
First Line Centre
|
Bishop at 36yrs old is fine. Goalies aren't like forwards. They don't slow down the same way and can play well into their late 30s. Especially a goalie like Bishop who depends on his size and positioning more than his athleticism and speed.
|
|
|
05-12-2017, 01:17 PM
|
#397
|
Participant 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
Haha. I didn't changed the definition of anything. You just chose to ignore the whole picture by dismissing things like wins and his Conn Smythe worthy playoff run that year.
|
Wins take a whole team to produce, and I'm confused... did he win the Conn Smythe? It's not like he was a top 5 goaltender in the playoffs that year.
Unless you have evidence of that other than "made it to the finals."
|
|
|
05-12-2017, 01:19 PM
|
#398
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
I don't think Dallas signed Bishop to a 6 year deal with the idea they might be burying 2 or 3 years of that deal in the minors...
|
Agreed. They signed him to a 6 year deal knowing that their is a good chance he performs well as a starting goalie well into his mid 30's, just like many of them do.
Like Miller, Luongo, Rinne, Lundqvist, Andersen, Nabokov, Brodeur, Roy just to name a few.
|
|
|
05-12-2017, 01:24 PM
|
#399
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sec206
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by roof-daddy
agreed. They signed him to a 6 year deal knowing that their is a good chance he performs well as a starting goalie well into his mid 30's, just like many of them do.
Like kiprusoff, miller, luongo, rinne, lundqvist, andersen, nabokov, brodeur, roy just to name a few.
|
fyp
|
|
|
05-12-2017, 01:25 PM
|
#400
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
Wins take a whole team to produce, and I'm confused... did he win the Conn Smythe? It's not like he was a top 5 goaltender in the playoffs that year.
Unless you have evidence of that other than "made it to the finals."
|
So does save percentage and goals against. The whole team is involved in all of that.
As for the Conn Smythe, if the Bolts had won the Cup it would have been between Bishop, Johnson and Hedman. Everybody knows that, you're just being obtuse now. Two game 7 shut outs, stellar numbers and 13 wins. It was a Conn Smythe worthy playoff performance.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:09 PM.
|
|