I've heard a lot of pundits talking recently about how the undecideds always break in favour of the challengers. Apparently it will be extremely difficult now for Bush to gain a win in those states where he's now trailing or tied. In something like 190 American elections at various levels, the challenger gets the undecided vote in 160 of those. If this is in any way true this time, Kerry has this election handily. The guy at electoral-vote.com has a map showing how things would turn out if current undecideds vote 2:1 in favour of Kerry:
http://www.electoral-vote.com/pred/
Yeah, obviously it's a big what-if; Personally I can't imagine the election being so one-sided. What does everyone else think? Is there merit to this 'undecideds vote for the challenger' mentality, or is it a bunch of liberal media hooey?
