[PGT] Flames get robbed and lose 4-3 to the Blues in OT

[OldSam]

Pretty embarrassing stuff. Flames deserve better.

[SuperMatt18]

Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist

Based on the rule book, that's a good goal imo

*Ducks for cover

But the goaltended was pushed into the net...so the rule clearly says no goal.

Nothing Shrangovich did caused Parayko to push Vladar into the net

[dammage79]

Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist

Based on the rule book, that's a good goal imo

*Ducks for cover

So.... Bahl/Sharangovich pushed Paraykos stick into Vlad's pads? That is a big reach in applying that part of the rule to the goal seeing as Bahl was staking towards Paraykos side and away from Vlad.

[TrentCrimmIndependent]

League just casually ignoring its own rules. Why have em?

[Jbo]

Huska would really make me love him if he said some truth and took a fine. Would just love a coach to ask the media which game they bet on in the situation room

[Street Pharmacist]

Originally Posted by AC

What about the 2nd paragraph?

"In the event that a goalkeeper has been pushed into the net together with the puck by an attacking player after making a stop, the goal will be disallowed."

It's the first paragraph for me. Loose puck, attacking player is allowed to also make a play at that puck. Vladar was not pushed in "with the puck" there really as he didn't have the puck

[showtime]

The league states no goaltender interference occured. 69.7 is in played.

[Enoch Root]

Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist

Based on the rule book, that's a good goal imo

*Ducks for cover

how can you possibly read that and think 'good goal'?

"In the event that the goalkeeper is pushed into the net together with the puck by an attacking player after making a stop, the goal will be disallowed"

Parayko hit the puck, Vladar saved it, then Parayko pushed his pad into the net. That is exactly what the rule says should be disallowed

[Junglist]

Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist

It's the first paragraph for me. Loose puck, attacking player is allowed to also make a play at that puck

Read the rest or is that good enough for a pill pusher?

[puffnstuff]

Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist

It's the first paragraph for me. Loose puck, attacking player is allowed to also make a play at that puck

But it also says incidental contact, that was intentional contact

[Street Pharmacist]

Originally Posted by Junglist

Read the rest or is that good enough for a pill pusher?

I don't think the second paragraph is relevant because he didn't get pushed in "with the puck".

[Jbo]

Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist

It's the first paragraph for me. Loose puck, attacking player is allowed to also make a play at that puck. Vladar was not pushed in "with the puck" there really as he didn't have the puck

I’m sure the league will continue to apply this rule evenly and fairly to all teams then.

Case closed!

[ballin]

Originally Posted by Goriders

Flames deserved that one. Need to bury more chances.

Vladar deserved a better fate.

This is a fair point. The game should have never gotten there. Gotta finish. But. This was a farce and I am suuuuuuper excited to see them explain this

[Street Pharmacist]

Originally Posted by Junglist

Read the rest or is that good enough for a pill pusher?

Simmer down

[Junglist]

Originally Posted by Jbo

Huska would really make me love him if he said some truth and took a fine. Would just love a coach to ask the media which game they bet on in the situation room

He will just laugh about Guy Gaudreau making a joke about how the finally scored 3 goals.

[Jbo]

Originally Posted by ballin

This is a fair point. The game should have never gotten there. Gotta finish. But. This was a farce and I am suuuuuuper excited to see them explain this

Narrator

“They did not”

[Junglist]

go flames go woo

[RedHawk12]

Originally Posted by Junglist

Read the rest or is that good enough for a pill pusher?

Damn bro, dafuq wrong with you?

[3rd liner]

Flames got the raw end of that one, that's the way she goes sometimes, unfortunately. At least it was the blues in this case (who are terrible and nobody gives a **** about) and not the garbage dumps up north who benefitted from the call.
On to the next one. Looking forward to somebody elbowing Benn in the face.

[SuperMatt18]

Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist

I don't think the second paragraph is relevant because he didn't get pushed in "with the puck".

Clearly the stick is pushing the pad at the same time as the puck, the puck doesn't have to literally be on the stick as it's pushing in