Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-26-2018, 11:17 AM   #21
David Struch
First Line Centre
 
David Struch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Has Klimchuk ever passed through waivers before?
David Struch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 11:17 AM   #22
calculoso
Franchise Player
 
calculoso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Not a good day to have the "CARRICK" last name...
calculoso is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to calculoso For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2018, 11:19 AM   #23
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Struch View Post
Has Klimchuk ever passed through waivers before?
This season is the first he was not waiver exempt. So no.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2018, 11:29 AM   #24
Mattman
First Line Centre
 
Mattman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: YYC
Exp:
Default

I wonder what's the thinking that goes into waiving someone like Lazar.

Do you do it early in the preseason when everyone is just chucking out players so it kinda flys under the radar.

Or would you hold onto him to the last possible day so that it's a 'tougher' choice for other GMs to make since they have their rosters made up.

I mean of course we don't want to loose Lazar, that would be unfortunate, but wouldn't it be best to waive him early so that he's no so much of a 'standout' player?
__________________
Mattman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 11:32 AM   #25
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

The strategy for waiving Lazar is pretty easy.

You waive him. The next day he clears. There are Lazars waived every day in the preseason.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2018, 11:32 AM   #26
442scotty
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

They wont waive Lazar because they know that the scum up north will grab their home town boy and rub him in our noses lol
442scotty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 11:33 AM   #27
FBI
Franchise Player
 
FBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
Exp:
Default

I'm much less concerned about losing Lazar then I was losing Byron..
__________________
FBI is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to FBI For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2018, 11:33 AM   #28
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Honestly, I think given the depth of the team, I doubt the Flames are worried about losing Lazar at all.

Obviously Treliving saw something in him to give up the second well over a year ago. But a mid-20-year-old 2 goal scorer is worth nothing in the NHL. Paying him $1,050,000 to play in the AHL is not something that the team wants to do.

The question on their minds isn't about protecting him from being claimed as much as whether another player, say Dube, pushes him off the team costing them roughly $1,000,000 this season. Or if it's not worth it to have him in the pressbox as a warm body.
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 11:33 AM   #29
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 442scotty View Post
They wont waive Lazar because they know that the scum up north will grab their home town boy and rub him in our noses lol
Rub our noses in being stuck with yet another non-NHL player on their NHL roster?
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Coach For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2018, 11:33 AM   #30
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
The strategy for waiving Lazar is pretty easy.

You waive him. The next day he clears. There are Lazars waived every day in the preseason.
Sure, however if he is cut.

He is likely one of the last roster decisions to be made.
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 11:35 AM   #31
Drunk Uncle
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Drunk Uncle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattman View Post
I wonder what's the thinking that goes into waiving someone like Lazar.

Do you do it early in the preseason when everyone is just chucking out players so it kinda flys under the radar.

Or would you hold onto him to the last possible day so that it's a 'tougher' choice for other GMs to make since they have their rosters made up.

I mean of course we don't want to loose Lazar, that would be unfortunate, but wouldn't it be best to waive him early so that he's no so much of a 'standout' player?
Like it or not, I think the logic is that they don't waive him because he makes the Flames.
Drunk Uncle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 11:37 AM   #32
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

I honestly can't see any of these guys getting claimed.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 11:37 AM   #33
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Thought Klimchuk looked alright but I'm also not against them cutting down to their full roster sooner than Gulutzan always did.

Annoyed Lazar is still up. Wouldn't mind seeing him and Hathaway sent down
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 11:38 AM   #34
ResAlien
Lifetime In Suspension
 
ResAlien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

I’m not sure any team is chomping at the bit to snatch up the smoking hot commodity that is Curtis Lazar. If waived he should clear no problem. I’d be more upset if he made the team than if he was waived and picked up.
ResAlien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 11:39 AM   #35
Drunk Uncle
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Drunk Uncle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit View Post
Thought Klimchuk looked alright but I'm also not against them cutting down to their full roster sooner than Gulutzan always did.

Annoyed Lazar is still up. Wouldn't mind seeing him and Hathaway sent down
Curious who you think should our 13th/14th forward should be if both are sent down.
Drunk Uncle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 11:41 AM   #36
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
Mildly surprised no Lazar on here but he is probably in a battle until the last day of camp.

He has stone hands and a very classically bottom six skill level, but he was somewhat effective on our fourth line last year. He's not a guy you're worried about sitting in the press box unlike, say, Mangiapane and he's arguably the fastest forward on our team who also has some size to him. He also had a nice setup to Phillips in the previous game - Peters was actually praising Mangiapane-Gawdin-Lazar as a line even though most of us were praising Bennett-Jankowski-Frolik.


He's not in a battle for a top twelve position, but I'd prefer him over a lot of other options (e.g. Hathaway, Peluso) as the 13th/14th forward
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 11:42 AM   #37
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Meh, he'll do well in the AHL.
Plugging away at 0.65 points per game with some solid defensive play in the AHL is nothing to scoff at, but in reality Klimchuk was never really in contention to make the team barring him taking a huge step forward.

Dube, Mangiapane, Foo, Czarnik, and Hathaway are all ahead of him on the depth chart. It seems like Lazar is as well, although I'm not sure I agree with that.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 11:48 AM   #38
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

I kind of like the idea of rotating our 13/14 forwards. It seems these type of guys play better the first couple games. TBH, I think I'd go with Lomberg as an extra to start the season
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 11:49 AM   #39
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

There's 13* one-way contract forwards (including Tkachuk). 7 one-way contract defenseman and 2 one-way contract goalies.

That really leaves one forward spot up for grabs. Any other position, whether it's Hathaway's or Lazar's will really need someone to force there hand. Otherwise they won't take lightly to throwing away a million dollars on those guys playing in the AHL when their likely replacement would just be in the pressbox anyways.

Similar, while I assume Prout will be the resident face-puncher who sits most games, Kulak's one-way was not of their own volition so his position is the least secured. But it will still require one of the young guys to be obvious NHL ready that forces the team to pay Kulak $800,000 in the AHL. Interesting enough Prout isn't listed on the Flames roster, despite his one-way contract while someone like Peluso is with a two-way contract.

And finally with the goalies, Gillies got an intentional contract that is two-way contract this year and one-way contract next year, while Rittich has a one-way contract this year. It's obvious what they were going for entering training camp, whether Gillies forced their hand (or Rittich didn't impress) will have to be seen.
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 11:55 AM   #40
PugnaciousIntern
First Line Centre
 
PugnaciousIntern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

I imagine that Lazar would make an excellent extra Fwd. Along with Peluso, you’ve got some speed or some muscle to add depending on the game demands. But you don’t care if eat popcorn. They might not be the best available forwards, but they do bring qualities that the others might not.

I do agree that the top 12 should more or less be who deserves it most. Forwards 13 and 14 can be more unique role players and that’s ok, it gives the coach flexibility game to game. And that’s ignoring the ‘stunted development’ of putting someone like Mangiapane in the press box for 70 games.
PugnaciousIntern is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PugnaciousIntern For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:55 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy