Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-01-2017, 12:52 PM   #21
JohnnyTitan
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Exp:
Default

Two things this analysis made me realize:
1) Even the "Core" players are usually not contributing right away like our recent top-6 picks. We've been super-spoiled with Monahan, Tkachuk and even Bennett. The player the Flames pick at #16 will most likely not be contributing for a while. Even Tarasenko played two years post-draft before he played NHL. CP is not a patient bunch, so I'm already anticipating our #16 pick being dubbed a bust when he returns to Junior for his 19 year old season and then heads to the "A" for his 20 year old season! LOL

2) We don't really need to dwell or be upset with past management regarding our last picks in the 20s. Janko (#21 2012), Poirier (#22 2013) and Klimchuck (#28 2013) will probably end up slotting in right about what I'd expect the league average is for picks in the 20s. Hopefully a core piece, a support player and a bust but at least a support player, a tweener and a bust.

Bonus thing realized: I agree (and always agreed) that picks are far over-valued. The scenario that comes to mind, which will still pan-out over the next few years, was trading a 2nd round pick for Lazar. Some on these boards were PISSED that we'd trade something as valuable as #47th overall for a "Risk" on Lazar. I for one would MUCH rather have a 22-year-old who's already played 180 games in the NHL than the lottery ticket at #47. No waiting three or four years for development...and I'd guess less than a 10% chance that #47 pick ever plays even 100 NHL games.

Of course -> I don't want to trade all our picks and it sucks not having a 2nd or a 3rd rounder this year...but having Hamilton and Lazar will prove to be WAY better than #15 in 2015 and #47 in 2017. NHL roster players are valuable...especially when they're under 25 !
JohnnyTitan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JohnnyTitan For This Useful Post:
Old 06-01-2017, 12:55 PM   #22
1_Flames_Fan
#1 Goaltender
 
1_Flames_Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Exp:
Default

Take Makar from the Bandits
1_Flames_Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2017, 12:58 PM   #23
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

16th Overall NHL Draft Picks (Back to 1980)
http://www.mynhldraft.com/nhl-draft-...verall/160509/
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2017, 01:25 PM   #24
Since1984
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1_Flames_Fan View Post
Take Makar from the Bandits
If he is still available, most media feel he will be the highest selected player out of the AJHL, beating our former hero Joe Colborne. If he falls to 16, that would be a nice little pickup.
Since1984 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Since1984 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-01-2017, 01:30 PM   #25
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InCoGnEtO View Post
I hope the Flames pull a Pats/Seahawks and trade back a few times to get more kicks at the can.

For instance, the Seahawks this year came into the draft with #26 overall.
Traded #26 for #31 and a 3rd (95th) and 7th.
Then traded #31 for #34 and a 4th.

They turned #26 into:
a 2nd (#34), a 3rd (#95), a 4th (#111), and a 7th. This would be best case scenario for the Flames, IMO. Turn #16 into #30, a 2nd and a 3rd, or something like that.
Depends who is left at 16. Flames may have a guy in their top 10 fall to them at 16, stuff like that happens all the time. Flames will do their homework. They will create a list of guys they are zoned in on. I think a trade back makes sense in 2 scenarios. I'll paint a couple hypotheticals

1. They've got 5 guys they are targeting. None of them are available at 16. Then you deal down cause the value isn't there.
2. They've got 6 guys they are targeting that they view as fairly equal. 5 of them are still left at #16. This would allow them to deal down a few spots and still get a guy they like equally as much

Dealing down scenarios IMO have to revolve around your list of targeted players
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-01-2017, 01:57 PM   #26
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

I'm really high on Kole Lind to be available when the Flames make their selection this year. Kid is a winger with some decent size. Can skate and finish. Leading the Rockets in scoring as a 18 year old doesn't hurt either.

You'd think the Flames will have had a good look at him with Dube being in the Rockets system as well.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2017, 03:38 PM   #27
Five-hole
Franchise Player
 
Five-hole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
Exp:
Default

Cherepanov - Bust. Harsh.

Five-hole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2017, 04:11 PM   #28
Teroy
Scoring Winger
 
Teroy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: B.C.
Exp:
Default

There's always terrific players throughout the draft.

http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/draft/t...r00005090.html
Teroy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy