Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-03-2017, 10:01 AM   #21
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post
Given how narrow the margins are, and how wide the error bars are going to be on both your estimated mileage and your average fuel economy and the average price of gas, this is all fairly useless speculation.
Isn't everything on this forum technically useless?

Sometimes people don't think twice about fuel economy and what that means for their bottom line. An exercise like this can open people's eyes.

I would highly recommend the Altima for instance as a mid-level car with decent options and amazing fuel economy. I'm a pretty tall person and the car is comfortable enough even for me.

The truck is where my heart truly lies though. Plus it has active fuel management so it's not as bad as the V-8s of old. It shuts off 4 cylinders when cruising and not towing or hauling.
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2017, 10:06 AM   #22
Torture
Loves Teh Chat!
 
Torture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
Weird. I was told we were saving the environment.

Anyway, this is hopefully a drive-by. My new years resolution is to stop arguing about politics. Made it 3 days...
Maybe I should add a disclaimer.

All of my posts are strictly my opinion as I'm not Rachel Notley.
Torture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2017, 10:08 AM   #23
PsYcNeT
Franchise Player
 
PsYcNeT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Marseilles Of The Prairies
Exp:
Default

'09 Murano - 3.5 V6 VQ35DE 245 HP
City/Combined - ~12.5l/100 on premium, ~14l/100 on reg
Highway - 9l/100 on premium, 10.5l/100 on reg

EDIT I do about 23,000 KM a year on avg, with a fair bit of highway between CGY-EDM.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Settle down there, Temple Grandin.

Last edited by PsYcNeT; 01-03-2017 at 10:17 AM.
PsYcNeT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2017, 10:08 AM   #24
mdubz
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

2017 Nissan Armada
avg 17L/100KM in the city

It's a pig on gas.
mdubz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mdubz For This Useful Post:
V
Old 01-03-2017, 10:09 AM   #25
jwslam
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

jwslam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2017, 10:11 AM   #26
Canehdianman
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

F-150 ecoboost

averaging 13.9L/100km for the past year (includes some towing in the summer)

I assume I drive about 15,000 km a year, so I burn about 2,085 L a year.

I figure I could get my fuel economy down to 13.0 if I removed my truck nutz, gun rack and took out my 13" lift, but then how will people idolize me?
Canehdianman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Canehdianman For This Useful Post:
Old 01-03-2017, 10:13 AM   #27
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

My Ford Flex does 12L/100km +/- 0.5L depending on how much "highway" driving we do during a tank. We do about 16,000km per year in the family hauler.

My winter beater does 11L/100km and only gets driven about 3000km per year.
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2017, 10:16 AM   #28
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Torture View Post
And yes, L/100km is a dumb measurement.
As opposed to MPG?

Car A gets 30 MPG
Car B gets 25 MPG
Car C gets 35 MPG

Say all of them drive 10,000 miles in one year. Car B looks like it should be worse than Car A by as much much as Car C is better than Car A.

Car A uses 333 gallons
Car B uses 400 gallons -> 777 more than Car A
Car C uses 286 gallons -> 47 less gallons than Car A

That is what I call a dumb measurement.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Bumface For This Useful Post:
Old 01-03-2017, 10:17 AM   #29
zzibradleyizz
Backup Goalie
 
zzibradleyizz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

2015 Camaro ZL1 - If I milk it, 16L/100km city...now if I have fun...about 22-24L/100km.
2006 Mitsubishi Endeavor - 11L/100km
zzibradleyizz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2017, 10:17 AM   #30
llwhiteoutll
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

15.7-17.1L/100km

Four years of exact mileage and fuel purchased. Lifted 2008 GMC Sierra. Looks like the average price of fuel over those fours years was $0.95/L

Last edited by llwhiteoutll; 01-03-2017 at 10:20 AM.
llwhiteoutll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2017, 10:24 AM   #31
I_H8_Crawford
Franchise Player
 
I_H8_Crawford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post
Wait, Lexus hybrids take regular fuel? Since when?
For the model I purchased (ES 300h) since always - they use the EXACT same engine as the Camry/Avalon Hybrids.

I just wanted the extra comfort and technology that Lexus provides, otherwise I would have went with the Toyota
I_H8_Crawford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2017, 10:40 AM   #32
zamler
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

I have 3 cars (really 4 but the one I don't drive) they all give me about 10L/100km real world average. In total I drive about 10,000km per year. My environmental argument for not buying a new more efficient car is by not buying new I won't be contributing to climate change via energy used to produce the new car. Probably a weak argument.

As for Lexus hybrids needing premium I thought all of them took regular fuel unlike some of the gas only versions. Pretty sure the Atkinson cycle engine doesn't need or can benefit from higher octane.
zamler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2017, 10:56 AM   #33
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
I would highly recommend the Altima for instance as a mid-level car with decent options and amazing fuel economy. I'm a pretty tall person and the car is comfortable enough even for me.
I actually rented a 2016 Altima when I was visiting family over Christmas. I had it for a week, and drove probably 200-250km in it. It was a pretty good vehicle. I think it would be a solid daily driver for most people. Wouldn't be a good choice for me, given that the primary purposes of my cars are a) getting to a ski hill full of ski equipment in the winter or b) having fun in during warmer months.
Quote:
Originally Posted by I_H8_Crawford View Post
For the model I purchased (ES 300h) since always - they use the EXACT same engine as the Camry/Avalon Hybrids. I just wanted the extra comfort and technology that Lexus provides, otherwise I would have went with the Toyota
Interesting. I have an RX350 and I was under the impression that the hybrids took premium because the RX450h does. Sort of surprised that the ES serious would be significantly nicer than the Avalon, actually.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno

Last edited by CorsiHockeyLeague; 01-03-2017 at 11:00 AM.
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2017, 11:04 AM   #34
zamler
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post
Sort of surprised that the ES serious would be significantly nicer than the Avalon, actually.
I think the Avalon is the nicer car.
zamler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2017, 11:08 AM   #35
Frequitude
Franchise Player
 
Frequitude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
Exp:
Default

2016 Chevy Tahoe (someone's gotta keep the price of oil propped up)

Gas mileage: 16.3 L/100km actual (mostly city driving...advertised at 10.4 L/100km highway which is pretty accurate based on roadtrips)
Prorated Annual distance: 17,000 km
Annual Litres: 2,771 L/yr
Annual Cost: $3,300/yr
Carbon Tax cost: $125/yr
Frequitude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2017, 11:09 AM   #36
gasman
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canehdianman View Post
F-150 ecoboost

averaging 13.9L/100km for the past year (includes some towing in the summer)

I assume I drive about 15,000 km a year, so I burn about 2,085 L a year.

I figure I could get my fuel economy down to 13.0 if I removed my truck nutz, gun rack and took out my 13" lift, but then how will people idolize me?
That is insane mileage for an F-150.

I had a 2013 F150 ecoboost, and I tracked every drop of gas and every km. over 84,000kms, towing about 9,000kms (8,000lb trailer) and a mix of city/highway, my average was 18.0 l/100km, and my absolute personal best was 12.2 l/100km, which I did exactly for one tank of gas out of 174 and I don't have a heavy foot.

I am driving an F-250 Diesel now and am getting about 16.0l/100km (although that is only 5000km in) but with diesel being 10c/l cheaper than gas right now, I am not complaining.

The one difference may be usage, I commuted in my truck about 50% of the miles so that may have driven my mileage down.
gasman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2017, 11:10 AM   #37
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler View Post
I think the Avalon is the nicer car.
I like it too. I don't think they make an AWD version, unfortunately.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2017, 11:10 AM   #38
I_H8_Crawford
Franchise Player
 
I_H8_Crawford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post
I like it too. I don't think they make an AWD version, unfortunately.
Also no hybrid version in Canada.
I_H8_Crawford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2017, 11:24 AM   #39
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

2012 Ford Focus SE w/ Ecoboost - I get about 7.3L per 100 kms for my average driving. Pure highway driving is about 6.5L per 100 km.

2008 Kia Rondo - averages about 11L per 100 km. Transmission only being a 4 speed hurts.
__________________
My LinkedIn Profile.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2017, 11:30 AM   #40
The Yen Man
Franchise Player
 
The Yen Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

2014 Acura TL. I do about 12.5L / 100Km. Takes premium. I drive about 18,000 Km per year.

So rough calculation, 2,250L per year. So really, the tax costs me about $101 per year. Not make or break, but that's still about $8.50 more per month more. Every little thing adds up, and I find this is a needless tax.
The Yen Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:46 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy