Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-03-2016, 05:05 PM   #21
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire of the Phoenix View Post
Every other time in history the existing teams basically haven't been affected at all.
Filip Kuba would have looked great on the Flame blueline instead of Minnesota's.

Not really the point that was being made though.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
Old 02-03-2016, 05:09 PM   #22
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Filip Kuba would have looked great on the Flame blueline instead of Minnesota's.

Not really the point that was being made though.
At the time, he was deemed expendable. The Flames probably protected other guys they shouldn't have instead. They had pissed poor management at the time, go figure.

Sorry, what was your point? You made it sound like every expansion draft results in the existing teams losing good players, but that hasn't historically been the case.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2016, 05:14 PM   #23
IgiTang
Self-Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skudr248 View Post
Send to Mcdavid to Vegas, watch Edmontonians burn the city down. I wouldn't be opposed.
And in Edmonton they're saying send Gaudreau to Quebec city, he's french anyway... NG..
IgiTang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2016, 05:17 PM   #24
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

I get that the McDavid jokes sometimes write themselves, but are we really laughing at something like this?

Gaudreau
Monahan
Brodie
Hamilton
Bennett

This #$#@ isn't all that funny to me.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FanIn80 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-03-2016, 05:22 PM   #25
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
I get that the McDavid jokes sometimes write themselves, but are we really laughing at something like this?

Gaudreau
Monahan
Brodie
Hamilton
Bennett

This #$#@ isn't all that funny to me.
Honestly if we lose a player of that magnitude, I'd be done with the NHL. Could you imagine an expansion team stacked with youth like that while we toil another five years trying to replace our losses.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fire of the Phoenix For This Useful Post:
Old 02-03-2016, 05:25 PM   #26
Gaudfather
Franchise Player
 
Gaudfather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Right behind you.
Exp:
Default

We can joke about McDavid - but what if Johnny Gaudreau or Sam Bennett was exposed - no one n Calgary would find that funny.
Gaudfather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2016, 05:34 PM   #27
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Like I said in the thread about the proposed battle for the final wildcard spot. I hate everything the NHL is doing these days. These things they are proposing and implementing have the potential to cripple franchises.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2016, 05:42 PM   #28
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Filip Kuba would have looked great on the Flame blueline instead of Minnesota's.

Not really the point that was being made though.
Management decided ancient veteran Tommy Albelin was more valuable. Waste of a great trade when Coates dealt Rocky Thompson for Filip Kuba. Kuba had a nice career.

I can't imagine teams losing top young players would ever fly.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 02-03-2016, 05:49 PM   #29
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

The NHL is no good.
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CroFlames For This Useful Post:
Old 02-03-2016, 05:57 PM   #30
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

If a new owner is paying $.5B for a team, I imagine he'll want some special treatment.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2016, 06:13 PM   #31
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
If a new owner is paying $.5B for a team, I imagine he'll want some special treatment.
Yeah, it's called the 1st overall pick. Maybe even 2 years in a row, that would be more than fair.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2016, 06:14 PM   #32
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

The NHL just needs to calm down for a while.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2016, 06:18 PM   #33
AhiChicken
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
For reference, in 2000 the protection choices were either:
  • 1 goalie, 5 D, 9 F
  • 2 goalies, 3 D, 7 F
So really, the Flames could protect 0 goalies, 7 D, 11 F.

Excellent Smithers.
AhiChicken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2016, 06:23 PM   #34
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

If it's all the players and you can only protect 1 5 9

1 G - Gillies
5 D - Gio Brodie Hamilton Kylington Andersson
9 F - Monahan Gaudreau Bennett Frolik Poirier Klimchuk Jankowski Granlund Backlund
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
Old 02-03-2016, 06:45 PM   #35
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
If it's all the players and you can only protect 1 5 9

1 G - Gillies
5 D - Gio Brodie Hamilton Kylington Andersson
9 F - Monahan Gaudreau Bennett Frolik Poirier Klimchuk Jankowski Granlund Backlund
No Ferland and Bouma?

1 G - Gillies
5 D - Gio, Brodie, Hamilton, Kylington, Andersson
9 F - Monahan, Gaudreau, Bennett, Frolik, Jankowski, Backlund, Bouma, Ferland, Poirier

One of Kylington, Andersson and Poirier would be replaced by our 1st rounder this year.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2016, 06:45 PM   #36
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
If it's all the players and you can only protect 1 5 9

1 G - Gillies
5 D - Gio Brodie Hamilton Kylington Andersson
9 F - Monahan Gaudreau Bennett Frolik Poirier Klimchuk Jankowski Granlund Backlund
I wonder what would happen with guys with NMCs? Presumably the union would not allow those guys to be claimed. If that happened, a guy like Gio might not have to be protected. Could add a whole new element to all this, one that makes NMCs an asset rather than a liability.

Knowing the NHL, they would probably make the NMC players take up a spot, even if they are undesirable assets.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2016, 06:51 PM   #37
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire of the Phoenix View Post
Yeah, it's called the 1st overall pick. Maybe even 2 years in a row, that would be more than fair.
I can see it now, 29 teams approve, Edmonton rejects.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Phanuthier For This Useful Post:
Old 02-03-2016, 06:52 PM   #38
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire of the Phoenix View Post
I wonder what would happen with guys with NMCs? Presumably the union would not allow those guys to be claimed. If that happened, a guy like Gio might not have to be protected. Could add a whole new element to all this, one that makes NMCs an asset rather than a liability.

Knowing the NHL, they would probably make the NMC players take up a spot, even if they are undesirable assets.
Was reported months ago that the NHL's interpretation is that a NMC does not protect a player from an expansion draft. The PA is likely going to challenge that on behalf all their members with NMCs.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 02-03-2016, 06:56 PM   #39
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
If it's all the players and you can only protect 1 5 9

1 G - Gillies
5 D - Gio Brodie Hamilton Kylington Andersson
9 F - Monahan Gaudreau Bennett Frolik Poirier Klimchuk Jankowski Granlund Backlund
I'm guessing that is close to what it will be as well. All players in an organization will be exposed. If so there will be a lot of good players available.

I don't have a huge issue with it. If the league is going to make the leap into a market like Vegas the last thing they'll want is a bottom feeder for 5-10 years. They'll want to make that franchise at least respectable right out of the gate.
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2016, 07:01 PM   #40
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post

For reference, in 2000 the protection choices were either:
  • 1 goalie, 5 D, 9 F
  • 2 goalies, 3 D, 7 F
Yeah, but Bettman is saying he wants these expansion teams to be more competitive right off the hop. If that's the case, we might be looking at something like:

1 G
4 D
6 F

And that makes decisions a lot tougher.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:39 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy